The diagnostic accuracy of perfusion-only scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of COVID-19: A single-center study of 434 patients

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data in the literature regarding the diagnostic accuracy of perfusion (Q)-only studies in the absence of ventilation images. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Q-only imaging in the pandemic era. METHODS: Patients who underwent Q-only imaging for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Turgut Bora Cengiz, Ahmed Abdelrahman, Scott A Rohren, John Doucette, Munir Ghesani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/article.asp?issn=1817-1737;year=2023;volume=18;issue=4;spage=199;epage=205;aulast=Cengiz
_version_ 1797352323103588352
author Turgut Bora Cengiz
Ahmed Abdelrahman
Scott A Rohren
John Doucette
Munir Ghesani
author_facet Turgut Bora Cengiz
Ahmed Abdelrahman
Scott A Rohren
John Doucette
Munir Ghesani
author_sort Turgut Bora Cengiz
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data in the literature regarding the diagnostic accuracy of perfusion (Q)-only studies in the absence of ventilation images. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Q-only imaging in the pandemic era. METHODS: Patients who underwent Q-only imaging for pulmonary embolism between March 2020 and February 2021 were analyzed. Patients who underwent lung quantification analysis were excluded. Q-only test results were reported as per modified PIOPED II criteria and single positron emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging was performed as needed. Patients were considered concordant or discordant by correlating the Q-only results with CT angiogram (CTA) or clinical diagnosis made through chart review. The diagnostic accuracy was calculated after excluding intermediate probability and nondiagnostic studies. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-four patients were identified. One hundred and twenty-eight patients (29.4%) underwent ultrasound Doppler, 37 patients (8.5%) underwent CTA, and 16 patients (3.6%) underwent both. After excluding patients with intermediate probability or nondiagnostic studies and who did not have follow-up (a total of 87 patients [20%]), 347 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. The combined planar and SPECT/CT sensitivity and specificity were 85.4% (72.2%–93.9% confidence interval [CI]) and 98.7% (96.9%–98.6% CI), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the Q-only imaging was 89.1% (77.3%–95.1% CI) and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.2% (96.4%–99% CI). The sensitivity with SPECT/CT reached 100% (CI: 71.5%–100%) with a specificity of 92.3% (CI: 64%–99.8%). The PPV was 85.7% (CI: 62.1%–95.6%) and the NPV was 100%. CONCLUSION: Q-only imaging provides clinically acceptable results. The sensitivity of the Q-only scan is increased when coupled with SPECT/CT.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T13:13:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dbebda4740304b15a17f491dca7db299
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1817-1737
1998-3557
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T13:13:47Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Annals of Thoracic Medicine
spelling doaj.art-dbebda4740304b15a17f491dca7db2992024-01-18T10:33:53ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAnnals of Thoracic Medicine1817-17371998-35572023-01-0118419920510.4103/atm.atm_42_23The diagnostic accuracy of perfusion-only scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of COVID-19: A single-center study of 434 patientsTurgut Bora CengizAhmed AbdelrahmanScott A RohrenJohn DoucetteMunir GhesaniINTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data in the literature regarding the diagnostic accuracy of perfusion (Q)-only studies in the absence of ventilation images. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Q-only imaging in the pandemic era. METHODS: Patients who underwent Q-only imaging for pulmonary embolism between March 2020 and February 2021 were analyzed. Patients who underwent lung quantification analysis were excluded. Q-only test results were reported as per modified PIOPED II criteria and single positron emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging was performed as needed. Patients were considered concordant or discordant by correlating the Q-only results with CT angiogram (CTA) or clinical diagnosis made through chart review. The diagnostic accuracy was calculated after excluding intermediate probability and nondiagnostic studies. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-four patients were identified. One hundred and twenty-eight patients (29.4%) underwent ultrasound Doppler, 37 patients (8.5%) underwent CTA, and 16 patients (3.6%) underwent both. After excluding patients with intermediate probability or nondiagnostic studies and who did not have follow-up (a total of 87 patients [20%]), 347 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. The combined planar and SPECT/CT sensitivity and specificity were 85.4% (72.2%–93.9% confidence interval [CI]) and 98.7% (96.9%–98.6% CI), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the Q-only imaging was 89.1% (77.3%–95.1% CI) and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.2% (96.4%–99% CI). The sensitivity with SPECT/CT reached 100% (CI: 71.5%–100%) with a specificity of 92.3% (CI: 64%–99.8%). The PPV was 85.7% (CI: 62.1%–95.6%) and the NPV was 100%. CONCLUSION: Q-only imaging provides clinically acceptable results. The sensitivity of the Q-only scan is increased when coupled with SPECT/CT.http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/article.asp?issn=1817-1737;year=2023;volume=18;issue=4;spage=199;epage=205;aulast=Cengizpulmonary embolismscintigraphyventilation/perfusion
spellingShingle Turgut Bora Cengiz
Ahmed Abdelrahman
Scott A Rohren
John Doucette
Munir Ghesani
The diagnostic accuracy of perfusion-only scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of COVID-19: A single-center study of 434 patients
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
pulmonary embolism
scintigraphy
ventilation/perfusion
title The diagnostic accuracy of perfusion-only scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of COVID-19: A single-center study of 434 patients
title_full The diagnostic accuracy of perfusion-only scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of COVID-19: A single-center study of 434 patients
title_fullStr The diagnostic accuracy of perfusion-only scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of COVID-19: A single-center study of 434 patients
title_full_unstemmed The diagnostic accuracy of perfusion-only scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of COVID-19: A single-center study of 434 patients
title_short The diagnostic accuracy of perfusion-only scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of COVID-19: A single-center study of 434 patients
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of perfusion only scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of covid 19 a single center study of 434 patients
topic pulmonary embolism
scintigraphy
ventilation/perfusion
url http://www.thoracicmedicine.org/article.asp?issn=1817-1737;year=2023;volume=18;issue=4;spage=199;epage=205;aulast=Cengiz
work_keys_str_mv AT turgutboracengiz thediagnosticaccuracyofperfusiononlyscaninthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismintheeraofcovid19asinglecenterstudyof434patients
AT ahmedabdelrahman thediagnosticaccuracyofperfusiononlyscaninthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismintheeraofcovid19asinglecenterstudyof434patients
AT scottarohren thediagnosticaccuracyofperfusiononlyscaninthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismintheeraofcovid19asinglecenterstudyof434patients
AT johndoucette thediagnosticaccuracyofperfusiononlyscaninthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismintheeraofcovid19asinglecenterstudyof434patients
AT munirghesani thediagnosticaccuracyofperfusiononlyscaninthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismintheeraofcovid19asinglecenterstudyof434patients
AT turgutboracengiz diagnosticaccuracyofperfusiononlyscaninthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismintheeraofcovid19asinglecenterstudyof434patients
AT ahmedabdelrahman diagnosticaccuracyofperfusiononlyscaninthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismintheeraofcovid19asinglecenterstudyof434patients
AT scottarohren diagnosticaccuracyofperfusiononlyscaninthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismintheeraofcovid19asinglecenterstudyof434patients
AT johndoucette diagnosticaccuracyofperfusiononlyscaninthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismintheeraofcovid19asinglecenterstudyof434patients
AT munirghesani diagnosticaccuracyofperfusiononlyscaninthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismintheeraofcovid19asinglecenterstudyof434patients