Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil

INTRODUCTION: The autopsy rate has continuously diminished over the past few decades, reducing the quality of medical care and the accuracy of statistical health data. OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of clinical diagnoses by comparing pre- and postmortem findings, and to identify potential risk fa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabiana Kotovicz, Thais Mauad, Paulo H. N. Saldiva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier España 2008-01-01
Series:Clinics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322008000500003
_version_ 1811318644310802432
author Fabiana Kotovicz
Thais Mauad
Paulo H. N. Saldiva
author_facet Fabiana Kotovicz
Thais Mauad
Paulo H. N. Saldiva
author_sort Fabiana Kotovicz
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION: The autopsy rate has continuously diminished over the past few decades, reducing the quality of medical care and the accuracy of statistical health data. OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of clinical diagnoses by comparing pre- and postmortem findings, and to identify potential risk factors for misdiagnoses. METHODS: Retrospective evaluations performed between June 2001 and June 2003 in a 2500-bed tertiary university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, including 288 patients who died at that institution and had a postmortem examination. RESULTS: Clinical and autopsy records were reviewed and compared for categorization using the adapted Goldman criteria. The overall major and minor discrepancy rates were 16.3% and 28.1%, respectively. The most common missed diagnoses were pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, and myocardial infarction, and the most prevalent underlying diseases were infectious diseases, cerebro-cardiovascular conditions, and malignancies. Patients age 60 or older had an increased risk of diagnostic disagreement, as did female patients. The period of hospitalization, last admission unit at the hospital and underlying disease were not significantly related to the pre-mortem diagnostic accuracy. DISCUSSION: The discrepancy rate found in this study is similar to those reported globally. The factors influencing diagnostic accuracy as well as the most commonly missed diagnoses are also consistent with the literature. CONCLUSION: Autopsy remains a crucial tool for improving medical care, and effort must be focused on increasing its practice worldwide.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T12:29:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dbee99b3435e40ca9a0ee82f924a5b26
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1807-5932
1980-5322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T12:29:19Z
publishDate 2008-01-01
publisher Elsevier España
record_format Article
series Clinics
spelling doaj.art-dbee99b3435e40ca9a0ee82f924a5b262022-12-22T02:46:55ZengElsevier EspañaClinics1807-59321980-53222008-01-0163558158810.1590/S1807-59322008000500003Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, BrazilFabiana KotoviczThais MauadPaulo H. N. SaldivaINTRODUCTION: The autopsy rate has continuously diminished over the past few decades, reducing the quality of medical care and the accuracy of statistical health data. OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of clinical diagnoses by comparing pre- and postmortem findings, and to identify potential risk factors for misdiagnoses. METHODS: Retrospective evaluations performed between June 2001 and June 2003 in a 2500-bed tertiary university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, including 288 patients who died at that institution and had a postmortem examination. RESULTS: Clinical and autopsy records were reviewed and compared for categorization using the adapted Goldman criteria. The overall major and minor discrepancy rates were 16.3% and 28.1%, respectively. The most common missed diagnoses were pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, and myocardial infarction, and the most prevalent underlying diseases were infectious diseases, cerebro-cardiovascular conditions, and malignancies. Patients age 60 or older had an increased risk of diagnostic disagreement, as did female patients. The period of hospitalization, last admission unit at the hospital and underlying disease were not significantly related to the pre-mortem diagnostic accuracy. DISCUSSION: The discrepancy rate found in this study is similar to those reported globally. The factors influencing diagnostic accuracy as well as the most commonly missed diagnoses are also consistent with the literature. CONCLUSION: Autopsy remains a crucial tool for improving medical care, and effort must be focused on increasing its practice worldwide.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322008000500003AutopsyAccuracyComparisonElderlyFemale
spellingShingle Fabiana Kotovicz
Thais Mauad
Paulo H. N. Saldiva
Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil
Clinics
Autopsy
Accuracy
Comparison
Elderly
Female
title Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil
title_full Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil
title_fullStr Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil
title_short Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil
title_sort clinico pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in sao paulo brazil
topic Autopsy
Accuracy
Comparison
Elderly
Female
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322008000500003
work_keys_str_mv AT fabianakotovicz clinicopathologicaldiscrepanciesinageneraluniversityhospitalinsaopaulobrazil
AT thaismauad clinicopathologicaldiscrepanciesinageneraluniversityhospitalinsaopaulobrazil
AT paulohnsaldiva clinicopathologicaldiscrepanciesinageneraluniversityhospitalinsaopaulobrazil