Estimating response distances of lesser prairie‐chickens to anthropogenic features during long‐distance movements

Abstract Spatially distributed populations often rely on large‐scale processes for long‐term population stability. These processes are driven by individuals moving across the landscape through long‐distance dispersal movements. However, as landscapes are continually altered by anthropogenic developm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacob M. Peterson, Julia E. Earl, Samuel D. Fuhlendorf, R. Dwayne Elmore, David A. Haukos, Ashley M. Tanner, Scott A. Carleton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-09-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3202
_version_ 1818295111475265536
author Jacob M. Peterson
Julia E. Earl
Samuel D. Fuhlendorf
R. Dwayne Elmore
David A. Haukos
Ashley M. Tanner
Scott A. Carleton
author_facet Jacob M. Peterson
Julia E. Earl
Samuel D. Fuhlendorf
R. Dwayne Elmore
David A. Haukos
Ashley M. Tanner
Scott A. Carleton
author_sort Jacob M. Peterson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Spatially distributed populations often rely on large‐scale processes for long‐term population stability. These processes are driven by individuals moving across the landscape through long‐distance dispersal movements. However, as landscapes are continually altered by anthropogenic development, increased fragmentation and avoidance behavior can affect landscape permeability and limit dispersal. Lesser prairie‐chickens (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) are a species of concern that have lost significant portions (>90%) of their historic distribution in the Southern Great Plains of the United States and are currently being impacted by continued anthropogenic development. Using GPS telemetry locations of 346 lesser prairie‐chickens across their entire geographic distribution, we identified 184 different long‐distance movements that drive population connectivity. We used empirical cumulative distribution functions to create a selection–avoidance–neutral curve and estimated the spatial scale of response to anthropogenic features (i.e., towers and windmills, large transmission and smaller distribution powerlines, oil wells, roads, and fences) during these movements. In addition, we tested for behavioral differences between movement types (e.g., exploratory loops vs. long‐distance movements between home ranges) and for regional differences in response among study areas. We found that during long‐distance movements, lesser prairie‐chickens generally avoided all anthropogenic feature types we tested despite some variation in the reported response distance among study areas. However, they avoided the tallest features (i.e., towers and windmills and transmission powerlines) at much greater distances in comparison with the shorter features in our analysis. Our results show that long‐distance movements are likely affected by responses to functional landscape fragmentation through increased development of anthropogenic features in important connectivity zones. As our estimated response distances during long‐distance movements varied in comparison with previously reported response distances during other behavioral states (e.g., breeding or nesting), using long‐distance or dispersal specific movement data may be more appropriate when asking questions related to connectivity across the landscape.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T03:42:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dbf5866312c74b61ad2a40431b446038
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2150-8925
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T03:42:27Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj.art-dbf5866312c74b61ad2a40431b4460382022-12-22T00:00:54ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252020-09-01119n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.3202Estimating response distances of lesser prairie‐chickens to anthropogenic features during long‐distance movementsJacob M. Peterson0Julia E. Earl1Samuel D. Fuhlendorf2R. Dwayne Elmore3David A. Haukos4Ashley M. Tanner5Scott A. Carleton6Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management Oklahoma State University Stillwater Oklahoma74078USASchool of Biological Sciences Louisiana Tech University Ruston Louisiana71272USADepartment of Natural Resource Ecology and Management Oklahoma State University Stillwater Oklahoma74078USADepartment of Natural Resource Ecology and Management Oklahoma State University Stillwater Oklahoma74078USAU.S. Geological Survey Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas66506USADepartment of Natural Resource Ecology and Management Oklahoma State University Stillwater Oklahoma74078USAU.S. Geological Survey New Mexico Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit New Mexico State University Las Cruces New Mexico87103USAAbstract Spatially distributed populations often rely on large‐scale processes for long‐term population stability. These processes are driven by individuals moving across the landscape through long‐distance dispersal movements. However, as landscapes are continually altered by anthropogenic development, increased fragmentation and avoidance behavior can affect landscape permeability and limit dispersal. Lesser prairie‐chickens (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) are a species of concern that have lost significant portions (>90%) of their historic distribution in the Southern Great Plains of the United States and are currently being impacted by continued anthropogenic development. Using GPS telemetry locations of 346 lesser prairie‐chickens across their entire geographic distribution, we identified 184 different long‐distance movements that drive population connectivity. We used empirical cumulative distribution functions to create a selection–avoidance–neutral curve and estimated the spatial scale of response to anthropogenic features (i.e., towers and windmills, large transmission and smaller distribution powerlines, oil wells, roads, and fences) during these movements. In addition, we tested for behavioral differences between movement types (e.g., exploratory loops vs. long‐distance movements between home ranges) and for regional differences in response among study areas. We found that during long‐distance movements, lesser prairie‐chickens generally avoided all anthropogenic feature types we tested despite some variation in the reported response distance among study areas. However, they avoided the tallest features (i.e., towers and windmills and transmission powerlines) at much greater distances in comparison with the shorter features in our analysis. Our results show that long‐distance movements are likely affected by responses to functional landscape fragmentation through increased development of anthropogenic features in important connectivity zones. As our estimated response distances during long‐distance movements varied in comparison with previously reported response distances during other behavioral states (e.g., breeding or nesting), using long‐distance or dispersal specific movement data may be more appropriate when asking questions related to connectivity across the landscape.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3202anthropogenic disturbancebehavioral fragmentationconnectivitycumulative distribution functiondispersallesser prairie‐chicken
spellingShingle Jacob M. Peterson
Julia E. Earl
Samuel D. Fuhlendorf
R. Dwayne Elmore
David A. Haukos
Ashley M. Tanner
Scott A. Carleton
Estimating response distances of lesser prairie‐chickens to anthropogenic features during long‐distance movements
Ecosphere
anthropogenic disturbance
behavioral fragmentation
connectivity
cumulative distribution function
dispersal
lesser prairie‐chicken
title Estimating response distances of lesser prairie‐chickens to anthropogenic features during long‐distance movements
title_full Estimating response distances of lesser prairie‐chickens to anthropogenic features during long‐distance movements
title_fullStr Estimating response distances of lesser prairie‐chickens to anthropogenic features during long‐distance movements
title_full_unstemmed Estimating response distances of lesser prairie‐chickens to anthropogenic features during long‐distance movements
title_short Estimating response distances of lesser prairie‐chickens to anthropogenic features during long‐distance movements
title_sort estimating response distances of lesser prairie chickens to anthropogenic features during long distance movements
topic anthropogenic disturbance
behavioral fragmentation
connectivity
cumulative distribution function
dispersal
lesser prairie‐chicken
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3202
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobmpeterson estimatingresponsedistancesoflesserprairiechickenstoanthropogenicfeaturesduringlongdistancemovements
AT juliaeearl estimatingresponsedistancesoflesserprairiechickenstoanthropogenicfeaturesduringlongdistancemovements
AT samueldfuhlendorf estimatingresponsedistancesoflesserprairiechickenstoanthropogenicfeaturesduringlongdistancemovements
AT rdwayneelmore estimatingresponsedistancesoflesserprairiechickenstoanthropogenicfeaturesduringlongdistancemovements
AT davidahaukos estimatingresponsedistancesoflesserprairiechickenstoanthropogenicfeaturesduringlongdistancemovements
AT ashleymtanner estimatingresponsedistancesoflesserprairiechickenstoanthropogenicfeaturesduringlongdistancemovements
AT scottacarleton estimatingresponsedistancesoflesserprairiechickenstoanthropogenicfeaturesduringlongdistancemovements