Global large-scale stratosphere–troposphere exchange in modern reanalyses

Stratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE) has important impacts on the chemical and radiative properties of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. This study presents a 15-year climatology of global large-scale STE from four modern reanalyses: ERA-Interim, JRA-55, MERRA-2, and MERRA. STE is sep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. C. Boothe, C. R. Homeyer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-05-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/5537/2017/acp-17-5537-2017.pdf
_version_ 1811317657070206976
author A. C. Boothe
C. R. Homeyer
author_facet A. C. Boothe
C. R. Homeyer
author_sort A. C. Boothe
collection DOAJ
description Stratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE) has important impacts on the chemical and radiative properties of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. This study presents a 15-year climatology of global large-scale STE from four modern reanalyses: ERA-Interim, JRA-55, MERRA-2, and MERRA. STE is separated into three regions (tropics, subtropics, and extratropics) and two transport directions (stratosphere-to-troposphere transport or STT and troposphere-to-stratosphere transport or TST) in an attempt to identify the significance of known transport mechanisms. The extratropics and tropics are separated by the tropopause <q>break</q>. Any STE occurring between the tropics and the extratropics through the tropopause break is considered subtropical exchange (i.e., in the vicinity of the subtropical jet). <br><br> In addition, this study employs a method to identify STE as that which crosses the lapse-rate tropopause (LRT), while most previous studies have used a potential vorticity (PV) isosurface as the troposphere–stratosphere boundary. PV-based and LRT-based STE climatologies are compared using the ERA-Interim reanalysis output. The comparison reveals quantitative and qualitative differences, particularly for TST in the polar regions. <br><br> Based upon spatiotemporal integrations, we find STE to be STT dominant in ERA-Interim and JRA-55 and TST dominant in MERRA and MERRA-2. The sources of the differences are mainly attributed to inconsistencies in the representation of STE in the subtropics and extratropics. Time series during the 15-year analysis period show long-term changes that are argued to correspond with changes in the Brewer–Dobson circulation.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T12:12:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dbfa8abe75fe48e883ba6bbb125220a7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T12:12:05Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-dbfa8abe75fe48e883ba6bbb125220a72022-12-22T02:47:28ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242017-05-011795537555910.5194/acp-17-5537-2017Global large-scale stratosphere–troposphere exchange in modern reanalysesA. C. Boothe0C. R. Homeyer1School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USASchool of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USAStratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE) has important impacts on the chemical and radiative properties of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. This study presents a 15-year climatology of global large-scale STE from four modern reanalyses: ERA-Interim, JRA-55, MERRA-2, and MERRA. STE is separated into three regions (tropics, subtropics, and extratropics) and two transport directions (stratosphere-to-troposphere transport or STT and troposphere-to-stratosphere transport or TST) in an attempt to identify the significance of known transport mechanisms. The extratropics and tropics are separated by the tropopause <q>break</q>. Any STE occurring between the tropics and the extratropics through the tropopause break is considered subtropical exchange (i.e., in the vicinity of the subtropical jet). <br><br> In addition, this study employs a method to identify STE as that which crosses the lapse-rate tropopause (LRT), while most previous studies have used a potential vorticity (PV) isosurface as the troposphere–stratosphere boundary. PV-based and LRT-based STE climatologies are compared using the ERA-Interim reanalysis output. The comparison reveals quantitative and qualitative differences, particularly for TST in the polar regions. <br><br> Based upon spatiotemporal integrations, we find STE to be STT dominant in ERA-Interim and JRA-55 and TST dominant in MERRA and MERRA-2. The sources of the differences are mainly attributed to inconsistencies in the representation of STE in the subtropics and extratropics. Time series during the 15-year analysis period show long-term changes that are argued to correspond with changes in the Brewer–Dobson circulation.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/5537/2017/acp-17-5537-2017.pdf
spellingShingle A. C. Boothe
C. R. Homeyer
Global large-scale stratosphere–troposphere exchange in modern reanalyses
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Global large-scale stratosphere–troposphere exchange in modern reanalyses
title_full Global large-scale stratosphere–troposphere exchange in modern reanalyses
title_fullStr Global large-scale stratosphere–troposphere exchange in modern reanalyses
title_full_unstemmed Global large-scale stratosphere–troposphere exchange in modern reanalyses
title_short Global large-scale stratosphere–troposphere exchange in modern reanalyses
title_sort global large scale stratosphere troposphere exchange in modern reanalyses
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/5537/2017/acp-17-5537-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT acboothe globallargescalestratospheretroposphereexchangeinmodernreanalyses
AT crhomeyer globallargescalestratospheretroposphereexchangeinmodernreanalyses