Brighton v Will: The Legal Chasm between Animal Welfare and Animal Suffering
Through the mechanism of statutory interpretation, courts can narrow or widen the legal concept of animal cruelty. This was starkly brought to light in the case of <i>Brighton v Will</i>, where the Supreme Court of New South Wales held that stabbing a dog six times with a pitchfork and t...
Main Author: | Sophie Riley |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Animals |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/9/1497 |
Similar Items
-
<i>Brighton v RSPCA NSW</i>: Appeals and Lessons Four Years On
by: Kathryn Jurd, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Comparison of Police Data on Animal Cruelty and the Perception of Animal Welfare NGOs in Hungary
by: Gábor Lorászkó, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Understanding Subordinate Animal Welfare Legislation in Australia: Assembling the Regulations and Codes of Practice
by: Rochelle Morton, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Socioeconomic Influences on Reports of Canine Welfare Concerns to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) in Queensland, Australia
by: Hao Yu Shih, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Animal Abuse as an Indicator of Domestic Violence: One Health, One Welfare Approach
by: Daniel Mota-Rojas, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)