Frontier Case of the Railroad Technician Luzhanskiy

The article analyzes the situation in Southern Manchuria in the Chinese city of Telin in 1901 as a result of the actions of Luzhansky (Luzhanskiy), a railway technician who served in the CER Society. Luzhansky showed direct violence toward indigenous people and Chinese workers during the laying of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexander Yu. Meshcheryakov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Limited Liability Company Scientific Industrial Enterprise “Genesis. Frontier. Science” 2023-05-01
Series:Журнал Фронтирных Исследований
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jfs.today/index.php/jfs/article/view/472
_version_ 1797810221135953920
author Alexander Yu. Meshcheryakov
author_facet Alexander Yu. Meshcheryakov
author_sort Alexander Yu. Meshcheryakov
collection DOAJ
description The article analyzes the situation in Southern Manchuria in the Chinese city of Telin in 1901 as a result of the actions of Luzhansky (Luzhanskiy), a railway technician who served in the CER Society. Luzhansky showed direct violence toward indigenous people and Chinese workers during the laying of the track. The established administrative system of administration in the territory of the CER right‑of-way could not resolve the conflict between the Chinese and Russian subjects. Luzhansky's case could have been regulated by the Tianjin Treaty of 1858 and the 1896 treaty for the construction and operation of the railroad, but the railway technician's actions extended beyond Northern Manchuria. Given that the Luzhansky technician's trial caused a clash of Russian and Chinese jurisdictions, this article examines the formation of the judicial system in the CER right-of-way. Such cases of violations of Chinese rights by Russian railway engineers provoked a discussion between Russian ministers on the issue of organizing a Russian court in Manchuria. The specific case of engineer Luzhansky reflects the colonial behavior and the subject's reaction in frontier territory. This article considers only a local case of the exercise of a special imperial right by a railroad technician and the restriction of his activities as a result of violations of the law, corporate ethics, and the 1898 lease agreement.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T07:04:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dc039c5a45bd4c7cb67a10f1bb625103
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2500-0225
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T07:04:52Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Limited Liability Company Scientific Industrial Enterprise “Genesis. Frontier. Science”
record_format Article
series Журнал Фронтирных Исследований
spelling doaj.art-dc039c5a45bd4c7cb67a10f1bb6251032023-06-06T13:42:08ZengLimited Liability Company Scientific Industrial Enterprise “Genesis. Frontier. Science”Журнал Фронтирных Исследований2500-02252023-05-018213315310.46539/jfs.v8i2.472472Frontier Case of the Railroad Technician LuzhanskiyAlexander Yu. Meshcheryakov0National Research University – Higher School of EconomicsThe article analyzes the situation in Southern Manchuria in the Chinese city of Telin in 1901 as a result of the actions of Luzhansky (Luzhanskiy), a railway technician who served in the CER Society. Luzhansky showed direct violence toward indigenous people and Chinese workers during the laying of the track. The established administrative system of administration in the territory of the CER right‑of-way could not resolve the conflict between the Chinese and Russian subjects. Luzhansky's case could have been regulated by the Tianjin Treaty of 1858 and the 1896 treaty for the construction and operation of the railroad, but the railway technician's actions extended beyond Northern Manchuria. Given that the Luzhansky technician's trial caused a clash of Russian and Chinese jurisdictions, this article examines the formation of the judicial system in the CER right-of-way. Such cases of violations of Chinese rights by Russian railway engineers provoked a discussion between Russian ministers on the issue of organizing a Russian court in Manchuria. The specific case of engineer Luzhansky reflects the colonial behavior and the subject's reaction in frontier territory. This article considers only a local case of the exercise of a special imperial right by a railroad technician and the restriction of his activities as a result of violations of the law, corporate ethics, and the 1898 lease agreement.https://jfs.today/index.php/jfs/article/view/472legal processmixed courtcolonizationrussian-chinese frontierrailway engineersthelinmanchuriachina-eastern railwaychinarussian empire
spellingShingle Alexander Yu. Meshcheryakov
Frontier Case of the Railroad Technician Luzhanskiy
Журнал Фронтирных Исследований
legal process
mixed court
colonization
russian-chinese frontier
railway engineers
thelin
manchuria
china-eastern railway
china
russian empire
title Frontier Case of the Railroad Technician Luzhanskiy
title_full Frontier Case of the Railroad Technician Luzhanskiy
title_fullStr Frontier Case of the Railroad Technician Luzhanskiy
title_full_unstemmed Frontier Case of the Railroad Technician Luzhanskiy
title_short Frontier Case of the Railroad Technician Luzhanskiy
title_sort frontier case of the railroad technician luzhanskiy
topic legal process
mixed court
colonization
russian-chinese frontier
railway engineers
thelin
manchuria
china-eastern railway
china
russian empire
url https://jfs.today/index.php/jfs/article/view/472
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderyumeshcheryakov frontiercaseoftherailroadtechnicianluzhanskiy