Advantages and difficulties of brush cytology in the identification of early oral cancer

Background: Early oral cancer is asymptomatic and highly curable, but unfortunately most cancers are advanced by the time when they are discovered, so the mortality is relatively high. The aim of this study was to refer the advantages as well as the difficulties of brush cytology in the identificati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Skoulakis Haralambos, Georgantzis Dimitrios, Leonidas-Nectarios Theodorou, Exarhou Maria, Divani Smaroula
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Oncology, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia 2009-01-01
Series:Archive of Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-7310/2009/0354-73100902011D.pdf
_version_ 1828409127933575168
author Skoulakis Haralambos
Georgantzis Dimitrios
Leonidas-Nectarios Theodorou
Exarhou Maria
Divani Smaroula
author_facet Skoulakis Haralambos
Georgantzis Dimitrios
Leonidas-Nectarios Theodorou
Exarhou Maria
Divani Smaroula
author_sort Skoulakis Haralambos
collection DOAJ
description Background: Early oral cancer is asymptomatic and highly curable, but unfortunately most cancers are advanced by the time when they are discovered, so the mortality is relatively high. The aim of this study was to refer the advantages as well as the difficulties of brush cytology in the identification of early oral cancer. Methods: Cytological smears obtained from of the oral mucosa of 36 patients were evaluated. The materials were taken with a cytobrush by scraping the surface of the suspected lesions, fixed with cytospray fixative and stained with the Papanicolaou method, whereas the residual was prepared by the liquid-based technique Thin-Prep 2000. Results: There were 29 inflammatory and mild dysplastic lesions, three cases with mild dysplasia only and two cases with severe dysplasia possible carcinoma. Another two showed squamous cell carcinoma. Histological examination of possible malignant and malignant cases showed well differentiated squamous cell carcinomas, so wide excisions were performed. Conclusion: Oral cytology is well accepted by the patient and attractive option for the early diagnosis of the oral cancer. It is useful when the lesion is large or multiple or the patients refuse biopsy. However there are factors that contribute to a false negative diagnosis such as the selection of the site of biopsy, necrosis, blood crusting, lack of adequate training, and the fact that malignant features of squamous cell carcinoma can be subtle resembling dysplasia.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T11:50:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dc0dd5013b484222ad7f305c172c3063
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0354-7310
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T11:50:19Z
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher Institute of Oncology, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
record_format Article
series Archive of Oncology
spelling doaj.art-dc0dd5013b484222ad7f305c172c30632022-12-22T01:49:57ZengInstitute of Oncology, Sremska Kamenica, SerbiaArchive of Oncology0354-73102009-01-01171-2111210.2298/AOO0902011DAdvantages and difficulties of brush cytology in the identification of early oral cancerSkoulakis HaralambosGeorgantzis DimitriosLeonidas-Nectarios TheodorouExarhou MariaDivani SmaroulaBackground: Early oral cancer is asymptomatic and highly curable, but unfortunately most cancers are advanced by the time when they are discovered, so the mortality is relatively high. The aim of this study was to refer the advantages as well as the difficulties of brush cytology in the identification of early oral cancer. Methods: Cytological smears obtained from of the oral mucosa of 36 patients were evaluated. The materials were taken with a cytobrush by scraping the surface of the suspected lesions, fixed with cytospray fixative and stained with the Papanicolaou method, whereas the residual was prepared by the liquid-based technique Thin-Prep 2000. Results: There were 29 inflammatory and mild dysplastic lesions, three cases with mild dysplasia only and two cases with severe dysplasia possible carcinoma. Another two showed squamous cell carcinoma. Histological examination of possible malignant and malignant cases showed well differentiated squamous cell carcinomas, so wide excisions were performed. Conclusion: Oral cytology is well accepted by the patient and attractive option for the early diagnosis of the oral cancer. It is useful when the lesion is large or multiple or the patients refuse biopsy. However there are factors that contribute to a false negative diagnosis such as the selection of the site of biopsy, necrosis, blood crusting, lack of adequate training, and the fact that malignant features of squamous cell carcinoma can be subtle resembling dysplasia.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-7310/2009/0354-73100902011D.pdfMouth NeoplasmsBiopsyMouth MucosaCarcinomaSquamous CellEarly Diagnosis
spellingShingle Skoulakis Haralambos
Georgantzis Dimitrios
Leonidas-Nectarios Theodorou
Exarhou Maria
Divani Smaroula
Advantages and difficulties of brush cytology in the identification of early oral cancer
Archive of Oncology
Mouth Neoplasms
Biopsy
Mouth Mucosa
Carcinoma
Squamous Cell
Early Diagnosis
title Advantages and difficulties of brush cytology in the identification of early oral cancer
title_full Advantages and difficulties of brush cytology in the identification of early oral cancer
title_fullStr Advantages and difficulties of brush cytology in the identification of early oral cancer
title_full_unstemmed Advantages and difficulties of brush cytology in the identification of early oral cancer
title_short Advantages and difficulties of brush cytology in the identification of early oral cancer
title_sort advantages and difficulties of brush cytology in the identification of early oral cancer
topic Mouth Neoplasms
Biopsy
Mouth Mucosa
Carcinoma
Squamous Cell
Early Diagnosis
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-7310/2009/0354-73100902011D.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT skoulakisharalambos advantagesanddifficultiesofbrushcytologyintheidentificationofearlyoralcancer
AT georgantzisdimitrios advantagesanddifficultiesofbrushcytologyintheidentificationofearlyoralcancer
AT leonidasnectariostheodorou advantagesanddifficultiesofbrushcytologyintheidentificationofearlyoralcancer
AT exarhoumaria advantagesanddifficultiesofbrushcytologyintheidentificationofearlyoralcancer
AT divanismaroula advantagesanddifficultiesofbrushcytologyintheidentificationofearlyoralcancer