The Evaluation of the Effects of Differently-Designed Toric Soft Contact Lenses on Visual Quality

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of aspheric Balafilcon A and spherical Senofilcon A toric soft contact lenses, which have two different stabilization systems, on visual quality. Material and Method: Forty eyes of 20 patients who were followed up in our contact lens s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sevda Aydın Kurna, Mustafa Demir, Ahmet Altun, Tomris Şengör
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2013-08-01
Series:Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.oftalmoloji.org/article_2280/The-Evaluation-Of-The-Effects-Of-Differently-designed-Toric-Soft-Contact-Lenses-On-Visual-Quality
_version_ 1797915334855884800
author Sevda Aydın Kurna
Mustafa Demir
Ahmet Altun
Tomris Şengör
author_facet Sevda Aydın Kurna
Mustafa Demir
Ahmet Altun
Tomris Şengör
author_sort Sevda Aydın Kurna
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of aspheric Balafilcon A and spherical Senofilcon A toric soft contact lenses, which have two different stabilization systems, on visual quality. Material and Method: Forty eyes of 20 patients who were followed up in our contact lens section were included in this study. Refractive errors of the patients were between -0.50 and -6.0 diopters of myopia and >0.75 diopter of astigmatism. The patients were randomly assigned to wear Balafilcon A (Purevision Toric, Baush&Lomb) with prism balast toric system or spherical designed Senofilcon A (Acuvue Oasys for astigmatism, Johnson&Johnson) with accelerated stabilization toric system. We recorded and compared the visual acuity with Snellen chart, contrast sensitivity with Bailey-Lovie chart in letters, mean root mean square (RMS) of corneal aberration with by Nidek Magellan Mapper for all eyes with and without glasses and while wearing Balafilcon A or Senofilcon A toric soft contact lenses. Results: We did not observe any difference in visual acuity between contact lenses. Contrast sensitivity was increased approximately 4.8-5.4 letters with contact lenses. Total higher order aberrations of mean RMS values were 0.42±0.14 µm without contact lens, 0.37±0.23 µm with Balafilcon A lens, 0.43±0.15 µm with Senofilcon A (p=0.507). Trefoil values were significantly higher with Senofilcon A lenses when compared to Balafilcon A lenses. There was no statistically significant difference for other measured higher order aberrations. Discussion: High and low contrast vision values were adequate in both contact lens groups. There was a non-significant decrease in total higher order aberration values with aspheric design contact lenses when compared to spherical designs. Although there were differences in aberrations related to lens designs, they did not have significant effect on visual quality. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2013; 43: 253-7)
first_indexed 2024-04-10T12:41:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dc1fbf1e9cc1485ea565d49d2f67cfc7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1300-0659
2147-2661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T12:41:07Z
publishDate 2013-08-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi
spelling doaj.art-dc1fbf1e9cc1485ea565d49d2f67cfc72023-02-15T16:14:20ZengGalenos YayineviTürk Oftalmoloji Dergisi1300-06592147-26612013-08-0143425325710.4274/tjo.43.36693The Evaluation of the Effects of Differently-Designed Toric Soft Contact Lenses on Visual QualitySevda Aydın Kurna0Mustafa Demir1Ahmet Altun2Tomris Şengör3Fatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Göz Kliniği, İstanbul, TürkiyeFatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Göz Kliniği, İstanbul, TürkiyeFatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Göz Kliniği, İstanbul, TürkiyeBilim Üniversitesi Florance Nightingale Hastanesi, Göz Kliniği, İstanbul, TürkiyePurpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of aspheric Balafilcon A and spherical Senofilcon A toric soft contact lenses, which have two different stabilization systems, on visual quality. Material and Method: Forty eyes of 20 patients who were followed up in our contact lens section were included in this study. Refractive errors of the patients were between -0.50 and -6.0 diopters of myopia and >0.75 diopter of astigmatism. The patients were randomly assigned to wear Balafilcon A (Purevision Toric, Baush&Lomb) with prism balast toric system or spherical designed Senofilcon A (Acuvue Oasys for astigmatism, Johnson&Johnson) with accelerated stabilization toric system. We recorded and compared the visual acuity with Snellen chart, contrast sensitivity with Bailey-Lovie chart in letters, mean root mean square (RMS) of corneal aberration with by Nidek Magellan Mapper for all eyes with and without glasses and while wearing Balafilcon A or Senofilcon A toric soft contact lenses. Results: We did not observe any difference in visual acuity between contact lenses. Contrast sensitivity was increased approximately 4.8-5.4 letters with contact lenses. Total higher order aberrations of mean RMS values were 0.42±0.14 µm without contact lens, 0.37±0.23 µm with Balafilcon A lens, 0.43±0.15 µm with Senofilcon A (p=0.507). Trefoil values were significantly higher with Senofilcon A lenses when compared to Balafilcon A lenses. There was no statistically significant difference for other measured higher order aberrations. Discussion: High and low contrast vision values were adequate in both contact lens groups. There was a non-significant decrease in total higher order aberration values with aspheric design contact lenses when compared to spherical designs. Although there were differences in aberrations related to lens designs, they did not have significant effect on visual quality. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2013; 43: 253-7)http://www.oftalmoloji.org/article_2280/The-Evaluation-Of-The-Effects-Of-Differently-designed-Toric-Soft-Contact-Lenses-On-Visual-QualityToric contact lenscorneal aberrationsvisual qualitycontrast sensitivity
spellingShingle Sevda Aydın Kurna
Mustafa Demir
Ahmet Altun
Tomris Şengör
The Evaluation of the Effects of Differently-Designed Toric Soft Contact Lenses on Visual Quality
Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi
Toric contact lens
corneal aberrations
visual quality
contrast sensitivity
title The Evaluation of the Effects of Differently-Designed Toric Soft Contact Lenses on Visual Quality
title_full The Evaluation of the Effects of Differently-Designed Toric Soft Contact Lenses on Visual Quality
title_fullStr The Evaluation of the Effects of Differently-Designed Toric Soft Contact Lenses on Visual Quality
title_full_unstemmed The Evaluation of the Effects of Differently-Designed Toric Soft Contact Lenses on Visual Quality
title_short The Evaluation of the Effects of Differently-Designed Toric Soft Contact Lenses on Visual Quality
title_sort evaluation of the effects of differently designed toric soft contact lenses on visual quality
topic Toric contact lens
corneal aberrations
visual quality
contrast sensitivity
url http://www.oftalmoloji.org/article_2280/The-Evaluation-Of-The-Effects-Of-Differently-designed-Toric-Soft-Contact-Lenses-On-Visual-Quality
work_keys_str_mv AT sevdaaydınkurna theevaluationoftheeffectsofdifferentlydesignedtoricsoftcontactlensesonvisualquality
AT mustafademir theevaluationoftheeffectsofdifferentlydesignedtoricsoftcontactlensesonvisualquality
AT ahmetaltun theevaluationoftheeffectsofdifferentlydesignedtoricsoftcontactlensesonvisualquality
AT tomrissengor theevaluationoftheeffectsofdifferentlydesignedtoricsoftcontactlensesonvisualquality
AT sevdaaydınkurna evaluationoftheeffectsofdifferentlydesignedtoricsoftcontactlensesonvisualquality
AT mustafademir evaluationoftheeffectsofdifferentlydesignedtoricsoftcontactlensesonvisualquality
AT ahmetaltun evaluationoftheeffectsofdifferentlydesignedtoricsoftcontactlensesonvisualquality
AT tomrissengor evaluationoftheeffectsofdifferentlydesignedtoricsoftcontactlensesonvisualquality