Rapid clinical score for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: A retrospective cohort study

Objective: The aim of our study was to retrospectively validate a previously described rapid clinical score (RCS) in distinguishing tuberculous meningitis (TBM) from viral meningitis (VM) in people who are at increased risk of tuberculosis, as well as from cryptococcal meningitis (CM) in HIV-infecte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raluca Jipa, Ioana D Olaru, Eliza Manea, Simona Merisor, Adriana Hristea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2017;volume=20;issue=4;spage=363;epage=366;aulast=Jipa
_version_ 1828492853441986560
author Raluca Jipa
Ioana D Olaru
Eliza Manea
Simona Merisor
Adriana Hristea
author_facet Raluca Jipa
Ioana D Olaru
Eliza Manea
Simona Merisor
Adriana Hristea
author_sort Raluca Jipa
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The aim of our study was to retrospectively validate a previously described rapid clinical score (RCS) in distinguishing tuberculous meningitis (TBM) from viral meningitis (VM) in people who are at increased risk of tuberculosis, as well as from cryptococcal meningitis (CM) in HIV-infected patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients admitted with a diagnosis of aseptic meningitis between January 2012 and December 2015, to a referral hospital for infectious diseases. The variables included in RCS were duration of symptoms before admission, neurological stage, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to blood glucose ratio, and CSF protein. We included in this retrospective study 31 patients with definite or probable TBM including 14 HIV-infected patients, 62 HIV-noninfected patients with VM, and 18 HIV-infected patients with CM. Results: The sensitivity of RCS to distinguish TBM from VM was 96.7%, with a specificity of 81.1% and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.949 (0.90–0.99). When all four criteria from the RCS were present, the specificity increased at 100%. In HIV-infected patients, the sensitivity and specificity of RCS in differentiating TBM from CM were 86.6% and 27.7%, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.669 (0.48–0.85). Conclusion: This easy-to-use RCS was found to be helpful in differentiating TBM from VM, with a better sensitivity than molecular amplification techniques and a relatively good specificity. However, the RCS was not useful to differentiate between TBM and CM in HIV-infected patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T11:27:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dc23dd4fcc5c4963860c5898e3c33ecc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-2327
1998-3549
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T11:27:56Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
spelling doaj.art-dc23dd4fcc5c4963860c5898e3c33ecc2022-12-22T01:08:58ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology0972-23271998-35492017-01-0120436336610.4103/aian.AIAN_219_17Rapid clinical score for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: A retrospective cohort studyRaluca JipaIoana D OlaruEliza ManeaSimona MerisorAdriana HristeaObjective: The aim of our study was to retrospectively validate a previously described rapid clinical score (RCS) in distinguishing tuberculous meningitis (TBM) from viral meningitis (VM) in people who are at increased risk of tuberculosis, as well as from cryptococcal meningitis (CM) in HIV-infected patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients admitted with a diagnosis of aseptic meningitis between January 2012 and December 2015, to a referral hospital for infectious diseases. The variables included in RCS were duration of symptoms before admission, neurological stage, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to blood glucose ratio, and CSF protein. We included in this retrospective study 31 patients with definite or probable TBM including 14 HIV-infected patients, 62 HIV-noninfected patients with VM, and 18 HIV-infected patients with CM. Results: The sensitivity of RCS to distinguish TBM from VM was 96.7%, with a specificity of 81.1% and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.949 (0.90–0.99). When all four criteria from the RCS were present, the specificity increased at 100%. In HIV-infected patients, the sensitivity and specificity of RCS in differentiating TBM from CM were 86.6% and 27.7%, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.669 (0.48–0.85). Conclusion: This easy-to-use RCS was found to be helpful in differentiating TBM from VM, with a better sensitivity than molecular amplification techniques and a relatively good specificity. However, the RCS was not useful to differentiate between TBM and CM in HIV-infected patients.http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2017;volume=20;issue=4;spage=363;epage=366;aulast=JipaClinical scorediagnosistuberculous meningitis
spellingShingle Raluca Jipa
Ioana D Olaru
Eliza Manea
Simona Merisor
Adriana Hristea
Rapid clinical score for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: A retrospective cohort study
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Clinical score
diagnosis
tuberculous meningitis
title Rapid clinical score for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Rapid clinical score for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Rapid clinical score for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Rapid clinical score for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Rapid clinical score for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort rapid clinical score for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis a retrospective cohort study
topic Clinical score
diagnosis
tuberculous meningitis
url http://www.annalsofian.org/article.asp?issn=0972-2327;year=2017;volume=20;issue=4;spage=363;epage=366;aulast=Jipa
work_keys_str_mv AT ralucajipa rapidclinicalscoreforthediagnosisoftuberculousmeningitisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ioanadolaru rapidclinicalscoreforthediagnosisoftuberculousmeningitisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT elizamanea rapidclinicalscoreforthediagnosisoftuberculousmeningitisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT simonamerisor rapidclinicalscoreforthediagnosisoftuberculousmeningitisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT adrianahristea rapidclinicalscoreforthediagnosisoftuberculousmeningitisaretrospectivecohortstudy