Vestibular modulation of spatial perception

Vestibular inputs make a key contribution to the sense of one’s own spatial location. While the effects of vestibular stimulation on visuo-spatial processing in neurological patients have been extensively described, the normal contribution of vestibular inputs to spatial perception remains unclear....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisa Raffaella Ferre, Matthew eLongo, Federico eFiori, Patrick eHaggard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00660/full
_version_ 1818150768267493376
author Elisa Raffaella Ferre
Matthew eLongo
Federico eFiori
Federico eFiori
Patrick eHaggard
author_facet Elisa Raffaella Ferre
Matthew eLongo
Federico eFiori
Federico eFiori
Patrick eHaggard
author_sort Elisa Raffaella Ferre
collection DOAJ
description Vestibular inputs make a key contribution to the sense of one’s own spatial location. While the effects of vestibular stimulation on visuo-spatial processing in neurological patients have been extensively described, the normal contribution of vestibular inputs to spatial perception remains unclear. To address this issue, we used a line bisection task to investigate the effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on spatial perception, and on the transition between near and far space. Brief left-anodal and right-cathodal GVS or right-anodal and left-cathodal GVS were delivered. A sham stimulation condition was also included. Participants bisected lines of different lengths at six distances from the body using a laser pointer. Consistent with previous results, our data showed an overall shift in bisection bias from left to right as viewing distance increased. This pattern suggests leftward bias in near space, and rightward bias in far space. GVS induced strong polarity dependent effects in spatial perception, broadly consistent with those previously reported in patients: left-anodal and right-cathodal GVS induced a leftward bisection bias, while right-anodal and left-cathodal GVS reversed this effect, and produced bisection bias toward the right side of the space. Interestingly, the effects of GVS were comparable in near and far space. We speculate that vestibular-induced biases in space perception may optimize gathering of information from different parts of the environment.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T13:28:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dc537bdd700141c49833b755f06e1e92
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T13:28:11Z
publishDate 2013-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-dc537bdd700141c49833b755f06e1e922022-12-22T01:05:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612013-10-01710.3389/fnhum.2013.0066058303Vestibular modulation of spatial perceptionElisa Raffaella Ferre0Matthew eLongo1Federico eFiori2Federico eFiori3Patrick eHaggard4University College LondonBirkbeck University of LondonBirkbeck University of LondonUniversity of PaviaUniversity College LondonVestibular inputs make a key contribution to the sense of one’s own spatial location. While the effects of vestibular stimulation on visuo-spatial processing in neurological patients have been extensively described, the normal contribution of vestibular inputs to spatial perception remains unclear. To address this issue, we used a line bisection task to investigate the effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on spatial perception, and on the transition between near and far space. Brief left-anodal and right-cathodal GVS or right-anodal and left-cathodal GVS were delivered. A sham stimulation condition was also included. Participants bisected lines of different lengths at six distances from the body using a laser pointer. Consistent with previous results, our data showed an overall shift in bisection bias from left to right as viewing distance increased. This pattern suggests leftward bias in near space, and rightward bias in far space. GVS induced strong polarity dependent effects in spatial perception, broadly consistent with those previously reported in patients: left-anodal and right-cathodal GVS induced a leftward bisection bias, while right-anodal and left-cathodal GVS reversed this effect, and produced bisection bias toward the right side of the space. Interestingly, the effects of GVS were comparable in near and far space. We speculate that vestibular-induced biases in space perception may optimize gathering of information from different parts of the environment.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00660/fullSpace PerceptionUnilateral spatial neglectvestibular systemgalvanic vestibular stimulationline bisection
spellingShingle Elisa Raffaella Ferre
Matthew eLongo
Federico eFiori
Federico eFiori
Patrick eHaggard
Vestibular modulation of spatial perception
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Space Perception
Unilateral spatial neglect
vestibular system
galvanic vestibular stimulation
line bisection
title Vestibular modulation of spatial perception
title_full Vestibular modulation of spatial perception
title_fullStr Vestibular modulation of spatial perception
title_full_unstemmed Vestibular modulation of spatial perception
title_short Vestibular modulation of spatial perception
title_sort vestibular modulation of spatial perception
topic Space Perception
Unilateral spatial neglect
vestibular system
galvanic vestibular stimulation
line bisection
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00660/full
work_keys_str_mv AT elisaraffaellaferre vestibularmodulationofspatialperception
AT matthewelongo vestibularmodulationofspatialperception
AT federicoefiori vestibularmodulationofspatialperception
AT federicoefiori vestibularmodulationofspatialperception
AT patrickehaggard vestibularmodulationofspatialperception