COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES

Objectives: To compare Open versus Closed method of creating pneumoperitoneum in terms of first access complications. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial. Place and Duration of Study: Surgical Department, CMH Rawalpindi, from October 2014 to April 2015. Material and Methods: Total 550 P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amir Iqbal Ali, Shehzad Abbasi, Syed Mukarram Hussain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2019-04-01
Series:Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/2733/2141
_version_ 1818922051804594176
author Amir Iqbal Ali
Shehzad Abbasi
Syed Mukarram Hussain
author_facet Amir Iqbal Ali
Shehzad Abbasi
Syed Mukarram Hussain
author_sort Amir Iqbal Ali
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: To compare Open versus Closed method of creating pneumoperitoneum in terms of first access complications. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial. Place and Duration of Study: Surgical Department, CMH Rawalpindi, from October 2014 to April 2015. Material and Methods: Total 550 Patients presenting in surgical OPD and undergoing elective laparoscopic procedures were included and randomly divided into two equal groups by lottery method. In group A, open technique (Hasson cannula) and in group B, closed technique (Veress needle) was used. All patients were monitored during surgery for any first access related complications and this was carried out at regular intervals. Data for each patient was recorded on patient’s proforma. Results: We found better safety profile of open (Hassan) method over close (Veress Needle). Except for more gas leakage in open group (6.2%) as compared to closed (5.1%), all other complications occurred more frequent in closed group. The mean access time in the Open Group (3.2 ± 1.1 minutes) was less than for the Closed Arm (5.4 ± 0.7 minutes). Conclusions: There was difference in frequency of complications in both groups with Open method being safer and rate of complication was less as compared to the close method.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T01:47:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dc5efa2d2ab7437baf7a5fc97bc06b20
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0030-9648
2411-8842
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T01:47:24Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Army Medical College Rawalpindi
record_format Article
series Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-dc5efa2d2ab7437baf7a5fc97bc06b202022-12-21T19:57:44ZengArmy Medical College RawalpindiPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal0030-96482411-88422019-04-01692255261COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIESAmir Iqbal Ali0Shehzad Abbasi1Syed Mukarram Hussain2Combined Military Hospital Chhor/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) PakistanCombined Military Hospital Quetta/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) PakistanCombined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi PakistanObjectives: To compare Open versus Closed method of creating pneumoperitoneum in terms of first access complications. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial. Place and Duration of Study: Surgical Department, CMH Rawalpindi, from October 2014 to April 2015. Material and Methods: Total 550 Patients presenting in surgical OPD and undergoing elective laparoscopic procedures were included and randomly divided into two equal groups by lottery method. In group A, open technique (Hasson cannula) and in group B, closed technique (Veress needle) was used. All patients were monitored during surgery for any first access related complications and this was carried out at regular intervals. Data for each patient was recorded on patient’s proforma. Results: We found better safety profile of open (Hassan) method over close (Veress Needle). Except for more gas leakage in open group (6.2%) as compared to closed (5.1%), all other complications occurred more frequent in closed group. The mean access time in the Open Group (3.2 ± 1.1 minutes) was less than for the Closed Arm (5.4 ± 0.7 minutes). Conclusions: There was difference in frequency of complications in both groups with Open method being safer and rate of complication was less as compared to the close method.https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/2733/2141pneumoperitoneumveress needlelaparoscopy
spellingShingle Amir Iqbal Ali
Shehzad Abbasi
Syed Mukarram Hussain
COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
pneumoperitoneum
veress needle
laparoscopy
title COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
title_full COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
title_short COMPARISON OF OPEN (HASSON) AND CLOSED (VERESS NEEDLE) METHODS OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
title_sort comparison of open hasson and closed veress needle methods of creating pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgeries
topic pneumoperitoneum
veress needle
laparoscopy
url https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/2733/2141
work_keys_str_mv AT amiriqbalali comparisonofopenhassonandclosedveressneedlemethodsofcreatingpneumoperitoneuminlaparoscopicsurgeries
AT shehzadabbasi comparisonofopenhassonandclosedveressneedlemethodsofcreatingpneumoperitoneuminlaparoscopicsurgeries
AT syedmukarramhussain comparisonofopenhassonandclosedveressneedlemethodsofcreatingpneumoperitoneuminlaparoscopicsurgeries