PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF STEROID-REFRACTORY GRAFT-VERUS-HOST DISEASE: SINGLE-CENTER STUDY

Introduction. Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (srGVHD) is one of the most severe and life-threatening complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Currently, there is no standard treatment for this complication. In addition, there is no data on the pharmacoeconom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. S. Moiseev, T. L. Galankin, A. A. Dotsenko, E. A. Burmina, Y. G. Fedukova, E. I. Darskaya, A. V. Kozlov, T. A. Bikova, L. S. Zubarovskaya, B. V. Afanasyev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University 2018-03-01
Series:Учёные записки Санкт-Петербургского государственного медицинского университета им. Акад. И.П. Павлова
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sci-notes.ru/jour/article/view/444
_version_ 1797700337475256320
author I. S. Moiseev
T. L. Galankin
A. A. Dotsenko
E. A. Burmina
Y. G. Fedukova
E. I. Darskaya
A. V. Kozlov
T. A. Bikova
L. S. Zubarovskaya
B. V. Afanasyev
author_facet I. S. Moiseev
T. L. Galankin
A. A. Dotsenko
E. A. Burmina
Y. G. Fedukova
E. I. Darskaya
A. V. Kozlov
T. A. Bikova
L. S. Zubarovskaya
B. V. Afanasyev
author_sort I. S. Moiseev
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (srGVHD) is one of the most severe and life-threatening complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Currently, there is no standard treatment for this complication. In addition, there is no data on the pharmacoeconomics of various methods in the Russian Federation. The objective is to compare the effectiveness and cost of treatment of acute and chronic srGVHD, as well as the use of different approaches in therapy. Material and methods. We have conducted a pilot study in 12 srGVHD patients treated with ruxolitinib and in 24 patients of wellmatched historical control, who treated with etanercept for the acute srGVHD and with extracorporeal photopheresis for chronic srGVHD. Results. The 6-month therapy of acute GVHD was associated with significantly higher cost than therapy of chronic GVHD (4.138±2.672 vs 1.862±1.122 thd. rub., р=0.004). The major factors driving up the costs were bacterial infections (р=0.022), opportunistic viral infections (р<0.001), severity of GVHD at the start of a therapy (р=0.013) and GI involvement (р=0.006). There was no difference in 1-year failure-free survival in acute (50 % vs 67 %, р=0.9) and chronic GVHD (87.5 % vs 87.5 %, р=1.0) between ruxolitinib and the control group, although the overall response was faster in ruxolitinib group (100 % vs 71 %, р=0.035, when assessed at 28 days in acute and 12 weeks in chronic srGVHD). The mean 6-month overall costs in the ruxolitinib were higher compared to the control group (1534 thd. rub. higher for acute and 541 thd. rub. higher for chronic GVHD), however this might be attributed to higher number of previous lines in the ruxolitinib group. Conclusions. It is revealed that the treatment of acute srGVHD requires significantly higher economic costs than chronic srGVHD. The power of this study does not allow to draw conclusions regarding the efficacy of different methods. Further studies are required to determine the optimal therapy of srGVHD.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T04:21:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dc5f22674c1747699865975c4f5b183e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1607-4181
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-03-12T04:21:25Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
record_format Article
series Учёные записки Санкт-Петербургского государственного медицинского университета им. Акад. И.П. Павлова
spelling doaj.art-dc5f22674c1747699865975c4f5b183e2023-09-03T10:33:22ZrusAcademician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical UniversityУчёные записки Санкт-Петербургского государственного медицинского университета им. Акад. И.П. Павлова1607-41812018-03-01251354410.24884/1607-4181-2018-25-1-35-44373PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF STEROID-REFRACTORY GRAFT-VERUS-HOST DISEASE: SINGLE-CENTER STUDYI. S. Moiseev0T. L. Galankin1A. A. Dotsenko2E. A. Burmina3Y. G. Fedukova4E. I. Darskaya5A. V. Kozlov6T. A. Bikova7L. S. Zubarovskaya8B. V. Afanasyev9Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University» St. PetersburgFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University» St. PetersburgFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University» St. PetersburgFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University» St. PetersburgFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University» St. PetersburgFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University» St. PetersburgFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University» St. PetersburgFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University» St. PetersburgFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University» St. PetersburgFederal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University» St. PetersburgIntroduction. Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (srGVHD) is one of the most severe and life-threatening complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Currently, there is no standard treatment for this complication. In addition, there is no data on the pharmacoeconomics of various methods in the Russian Federation. The objective is to compare the effectiveness and cost of treatment of acute and chronic srGVHD, as well as the use of different approaches in therapy. Material and methods. We have conducted a pilot study in 12 srGVHD patients treated with ruxolitinib and in 24 patients of wellmatched historical control, who treated with etanercept for the acute srGVHD and with extracorporeal photopheresis for chronic srGVHD. Results. The 6-month therapy of acute GVHD was associated with significantly higher cost than therapy of chronic GVHD (4.138±2.672 vs 1.862±1.122 thd. rub., р=0.004). The major factors driving up the costs were bacterial infections (р=0.022), opportunistic viral infections (р<0.001), severity of GVHD at the start of a therapy (р=0.013) and GI involvement (р=0.006). There was no difference in 1-year failure-free survival in acute (50 % vs 67 %, р=0.9) and chronic GVHD (87.5 % vs 87.5 %, р=1.0) between ruxolitinib and the control group, although the overall response was faster in ruxolitinib group (100 % vs 71 %, р=0.035, when assessed at 28 days in acute and 12 weeks in chronic srGVHD). The mean 6-month overall costs in the ruxolitinib were higher compared to the control group (1534 thd. rub. higher for acute and 541 thd. rub. higher for chronic GVHD), however this might be attributed to higher number of previous lines in the ruxolitinib group. Conclusions. It is revealed that the treatment of acute srGVHD requires significantly higher economic costs than chronic srGVHD. The power of this study does not allow to draw conclusions regarding the efficacy of different methods. Further studies are required to determine the optimal therapy of srGVHD.https://www.sci-notes.ru/jour/article/view/444allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationgraft-versus-host diseasesteroid-refractorypharmacoeconomics
spellingShingle I. S. Moiseev
T. L. Galankin
A. A. Dotsenko
E. A. Burmina
Y. G. Fedukova
E. I. Darskaya
A. V. Kozlov
T. A. Bikova
L. S. Zubarovskaya
B. V. Afanasyev
PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF STEROID-REFRACTORY GRAFT-VERUS-HOST DISEASE: SINGLE-CENTER STUDY
Учёные записки Санкт-Петербургского государственного медицинского университета им. Акад. И.П. Павлова
allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
graft-versus-host disease
steroid-refractory
pharmacoeconomics
title PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF STEROID-REFRACTORY GRAFT-VERUS-HOST DISEASE: SINGLE-CENTER STUDY
title_full PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF STEROID-REFRACTORY GRAFT-VERUS-HOST DISEASE: SINGLE-CENTER STUDY
title_fullStr PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF STEROID-REFRACTORY GRAFT-VERUS-HOST DISEASE: SINGLE-CENTER STUDY
title_full_unstemmed PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF STEROID-REFRACTORY GRAFT-VERUS-HOST DISEASE: SINGLE-CENTER STUDY
title_short PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF STEROID-REFRACTORY GRAFT-VERUS-HOST DISEASE: SINGLE-CENTER STUDY
title_sort pharmacoeconomic analysis of different methods for the treatment of steroid refractory graft verus host disease single center study
topic allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
graft-versus-host disease
steroid-refractory
pharmacoeconomics
url https://www.sci-notes.ru/jour/article/view/444
work_keys_str_mv AT ismoiseev pharmacoeconomicanalysisofdifferentmethodsforthetreatmentofsteroidrefractorygraftverushostdiseasesinglecenterstudy
AT tlgalankin pharmacoeconomicanalysisofdifferentmethodsforthetreatmentofsteroidrefractorygraftverushostdiseasesinglecenterstudy
AT aadotsenko pharmacoeconomicanalysisofdifferentmethodsforthetreatmentofsteroidrefractorygraftverushostdiseasesinglecenterstudy
AT eaburmina pharmacoeconomicanalysisofdifferentmethodsforthetreatmentofsteroidrefractorygraftverushostdiseasesinglecenterstudy
AT ygfedukova pharmacoeconomicanalysisofdifferentmethodsforthetreatmentofsteroidrefractorygraftverushostdiseasesinglecenterstudy
AT eidarskaya pharmacoeconomicanalysisofdifferentmethodsforthetreatmentofsteroidrefractorygraftverushostdiseasesinglecenterstudy
AT avkozlov pharmacoeconomicanalysisofdifferentmethodsforthetreatmentofsteroidrefractorygraftverushostdiseasesinglecenterstudy
AT tabikova pharmacoeconomicanalysisofdifferentmethodsforthetreatmentofsteroidrefractorygraftverushostdiseasesinglecenterstudy
AT lszubarovskaya pharmacoeconomicanalysisofdifferentmethodsforthetreatmentofsteroidrefractorygraftverushostdiseasesinglecenterstudy
AT bvafanasyev pharmacoeconomicanalysisofdifferentmethodsforthetreatmentofsteroidrefractorygraftverushostdiseasesinglecenterstudy