The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?

To our knowledge, there are no reports that demonstrate the use of host molecular markers for the purpose of detecting generic plant virus infection. Two approaches involving molecular indicators of virus infection in the model plant <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> were examined: the accumul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gardette R. Valmonte-Cortes, Sonia T. Lilly, Michael N. Pearson, Colleen M. Higgins, Robin M. MacDiarmid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Plants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/2/188
_version_ 1797491036826632192
author Gardette R. Valmonte-Cortes
Sonia T. Lilly
Michael N. Pearson
Colleen M. Higgins
Robin M. MacDiarmid
author_facet Gardette R. Valmonte-Cortes
Sonia T. Lilly
Michael N. Pearson
Colleen M. Higgins
Robin M. MacDiarmid
author_sort Gardette R. Valmonte-Cortes
collection DOAJ
description To our knowledge, there are no reports that demonstrate the use of host molecular markers for the purpose of detecting generic plant virus infection. Two approaches involving molecular indicators of virus infection in the model plant <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> were examined: the accumulation of small RNAs (sRNAs) using a microfluidics-based method (Bioanalyzer); and the transcript accumulation of virus-response related host plant genes, suppressor of gene silencing 3 (<i>AtSGS3</i>) and calcium-dependent protein kinase 3 (<i>AtCPK3</i>) by reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The microfluidics approach using sRNA chips has previously demonstrated good linearity and good reproducibility, both within and between chips. Good limits of detection have been demonstrated from two-fold 10-point serial dilution regression to 0.1 ng of RNA. The ratio of small RNA (sRNA) to ribosomal RNA (rRNA), as a proportion of averaged mock-inoculation, correlated with known virus infection to a high degree of certainty. <i>AtSGS3</i> transcript decreased between 14- and 28-days post inoculation (dpi) for all viruses investigated, while <i>AtCPK3</i> transcript increased between 14 and 28 dpi for all viruses. A combination of these two molecular approaches may be useful for assessment of virus-infection of samples without the need for diagnosis of specific virus infection.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:41:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dc5f28876fce4220aacba01703c940e7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2223-7747
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:41:40Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Plants
spelling doaj.art-dc5f28876fce4220aacba01703c940e72023-11-23T15:07:18ZengMDPI AGPlants2223-77472022-01-0111218810.3390/plants11020188The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?Gardette R. Valmonte-Cortes0Sonia T. Lilly1Michael N. Pearson2Colleen M. Higgins3Robin M. MacDiarmid4School of Science, AUT City Campus, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1142, New ZealandThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, 120 Mt Albert Road, Auckland 1025, New ZealandSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Thomas Building, 3a Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New ZealandSchool of Science, AUT City Campus, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1142, New ZealandThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, 120 Mt Albert Road, Auckland 1025, New ZealandTo our knowledge, there are no reports that demonstrate the use of host molecular markers for the purpose of detecting generic plant virus infection. Two approaches involving molecular indicators of virus infection in the model plant <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> were examined: the accumulation of small RNAs (sRNAs) using a microfluidics-based method (Bioanalyzer); and the transcript accumulation of virus-response related host plant genes, suppressor of gene silencing 3 (<i>AtSGS3</i>) and calcium-dependent protein kinase 3 (<i>AtCPK3</i>) by reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The microfluidics approach using sRNA chips has previously demonstrated good linearity and good reproducibility, both within and between chips. Good limits of detection have been demonstrated from two-fold 10-point serial dilution regression to 0.1 ng of RNA. The ratio of small RNA (sRNA) to ribosomal RNA (rRNA), as a proportion of averaged mock-inoculation, correlated with known virus infection to a high degree of certainty. <i>AtSGS3</i> transcript decreased between 14- and 28-days post inoculation (dpi) for all viruses investigated, while <i>AtCPK3</i> transcript increased between 14 and 28 dpi for all viruses. A combination of these two molecular approaches may be useful for assessment of virus-infection of samples without the need for diagnosis of specific virus infection.https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/2/188plant virusdetectionsRNAmolecular markersCPK<i>SGS3</i>
spellingShingle Gardette R. Valmonte-Cortes
Sonia T. Lilly
Michael N. Pearson
Colleen M. Higgins
Robin M. MacDiarmid
The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
Plants
plant virus
detection
sRNA
molecular markers
CPK
<i>SGS3</i>
title The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
title_full The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
title_fullStr The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
title_full_unstemmed The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
title_short The Potential of Molecular Indicators of Plant Virus Infection: Are Plants Able to Tell Us They Are Infected?
title_sort potential of molecular indicators of plant virus infection are plants able to tell us they are infected
topic plant virus
detection
sRNA
molecular markers
CPK
<i>SGS3</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/2/188
work_keys_str_mv AT gardettervalmontecortes thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT soniatlilly thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT michaelnpearson thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT colleenmhiggins thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT robinmmacdiarmid thepotentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT gardettervalmontecortes potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT soniatlilly potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT michaelnpearson potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT colleenmhiggins potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected
AT robinmmacdiarmid potentialofmolecularindicatorsofplantvirusinfectionareplantsabletotellustheyareinfected