Défense du complément circonstanciel
This article confronts two ways of analyzing verb complements in school grammars: the traditional analysis in terms of object and “circumstancial” complements and the analysis as verb (essential) and sentence (non essential) complements of what is called “new grammar”. It casts a critical view on th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO
|
| Series: | Corela |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/corela/7029 |
| _version_ | 1797313947579187200 |
|---|---|
| author | François Trouilleux |
| author_facet | François Trouilleux |
| author_sort | François Trouilleux |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article confronts two ways of analyzing verb complements in school grammars: the traditional analysis in terms of object and “circumstancial” complements and the analysis as verb (essential) and sentence (non essential) complements of what is called “new grammar”. It casts a critical view on the new grammar point of view and defends that of traditional grammar, by showing in particular that, provided one does not distort the original definition, it implements an analysis technique which conforms to standard methods in modern linguistics. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T02:38:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-dc6315f746c04895a077c2e6b024bafc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1638-573X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T02:38:59Z |
| publisher | Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Corela |
| spelling | doaj.art-dc6315f746c04895a077c2e6b024bafc2024-02-13T13:52:08ZengCercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICOCorela1638-573X16210.4000/corela.7029Défense du complément circonstancielFrançois TrouilleuxThis article confronts two ways of analyzing verb complements in school grammars: the traditional analysis in terms of object and “circumstancial” complements and the analysis as verb (essential) and sentence (non essential) complements of what is called “new grammar”. It casts a critical view on the new grammar point of view and defends that of traditional grammar, by showing in particular that, provided one does not distort the original definition, it implements an analysis technique which conforms to standard methods in modern linguistics.https://journals.openedition.org/corela/7029school grammarcomplement typesobjectadjunctadverbial phraselinguistic tests |
| spellingShingle | François Trouilleux Défense du complément circonstanciel Corela school grammar complement types object adjunct adverbial phrase linguistic tests |
| title | Défense du complément circonstanciel |
| title_full | Défense du complément circonstanciel |
| title_fullStr | Défense du complément circonstanciel |
| title_full_unstemmed | Défense du complément circonstanciel |
| title_short | Défense du complément circonstanciel |
| title_sort | defense du complement circonstanciel |
| topic | school grammar complement types object adjunct adverbial phrase linguistic tests |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/corela/7029 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT francoistrouilleux defenseducomplementcirconstanciel |