Masonry’s Resistance to Driving Rain: Mortar Water Content and Impregnation

Alongside well-researched themes such as water and moisture, the service life and function of masonry veneers are often compromised by precipitation combined with poor design considerations, execution, and selection of materials. Little research has been carried out on the subject of the impact of m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fredrik Slapø, Tore Kvande, Noralf Bakken, Marit Haugen, Jardar Lohne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-08-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/7/3/70
_version_ 1817987722925572096
author Fredrik Slapø
Tore Kvande
Noralf Bakken
Marit Haugen
Jardar Lohne
author_facet Fredrik Slapø
Tore Kvande
Noralf Bakken
Marit Haugen
Jardar Lohne
author_sort Fredrik Slapø
collection DOAJ
description Alongside well-researched themes such as water and moisture, the service life and function of masonry veneers are often compromised by precipitation combined with poor design considerations, execution, and selection of materials. Little research has been carried out on the subject of the impact of mortar consistency on masonry’s resistance to driving rain. Water-repellent (WR) impregnation is typically considered a quick fix when problems occur. Wall-panels of 1 m2 built with different flow table values for the mortar have been tested in a driving rain chamber, where both time-lapse videos and the measuring of penetrated water are used to evaluate performance. Subsequently, the panels were impregnated with the most common types of WR products and re-tested. The analysis shows that changing the mortar mix from dry to wet can decrease the penetration of driving rain by a factor of ten. The test results presented in this article show that mortar with low water content gives a porous interfacial transition zone (ITZ), thereby increasing the rate of water penetration. The tested WRs are found to be ineffective in increasing masonry’s resistance to high pressure driving rain. The results, combined with what is already known about WR treatments on masonry, call for careful consideration before applying such treatment. This proves especially true in countries with much driving rain followed by frequent freeze-thaw cycles.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:25:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dc65d9b36fce4555b94cd03bb4fe6b1d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:25:06Z
publishDate 2017-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-dc65d9b36fce4555b94cd03bb4fe6b1d2022-12-22T02:22:47ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092017-08-01737010.3390/buildings7030070buildings7030070Masonry’s Resistance to Driving Rain: Mortar Water Content and ImpregnationFredrik Slapø0Tore Kvande1Noralf Bakken2Marit Haugen3Jardar Lohne4Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, NorwaySINTEF Building and Infrastructure at Department Architecture, Materials and Structures, NO-7465 Trondheim, NorwaySINTEF Building and Infrastructure at Department Architecture, Materials and Structures, NO-7465 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, NorwayAlongside well-researched themes such as water and moisture, the service life and function of masonry veneers are often compromised by precipitation combined with poor design considerations, execution, and selection of materials. Little research has been carried out on the subject of the impact of mortar consistency on masonry’s resistance to driving rain. Water-repellent (WR) impregnation is typically considered a quick fix when problems occur. Wall-panels of 1 m2 built with different flow table values for the mortar have been tested in a driving rain chamber, where both time-lapse videos and the measuring of penetrated water are used to evaluate performance. Subsequently, the panels were impregnated with the most common types of WR products and re-tested. The analysis shows that changing the mortar mix from dry to wet can decrease the penetration of driving rain by a factor of ten. The test results presented in this article show that mortar with low water content gives a porous interfacial transition zone (ITZ), thereby increasing the rate of water penetration. The tested WRs are found to be ineffective in increasing masonry’s resistance to high pressure driving rain. The results, combined with what is already known about WR treatments on masonry, call for careful consideration before applying such treatment. This proves especially true in countries with much driving rain followed by frequent freeze-thaw cycles.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/7/3/70driving rainmortar flowimpregnationclay brick masonryworkmanship techniques
spellingShingle Fredrik Slapø
Tore Kvande
Noralf Bakken
Marit Haugen
Jardar Lohne
Masonry’s Resistance to Driving Rain: Mortar Water Content and Impregnation
Buildings
driving rain
mortar flow
impregnation
clay brick masonry
workmanship techniques
title Masonry’s Resistance to Driving Rain: Mortar Water Content and Impregnation
title_full Masonry’s Resistance to Driving Rain: Mortar Water Content and Impregnation
title_fullStr Masonry’s Resistance to Driving Rain: Mortar Water Content and Impregnation
title_full_unstemmed Masonry’s Resistance to Driving Rain: Mortar Water Content and Impregnation
title_short Masonry’s Resistance to Driving Rain: Mortar Water Content and Impregnation
title_sort masonry s resistance to driving rain mortar water content and impregnation
topic driving rain
mortar flow
impregnation
clay brick masonry
workmanship techniques
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/7/3/70
work_keys_str_mv AT fredrikslapø masonrysresistancetodrivingrainmortarwatercontentandimpregnation
AT torekvande masonrysresistancetodrivingrainmortarwatercontentandimpregnation
AT noralfbakken masonrysresistancetodrivingrainmortarwatercontentandimpregnation
AT marithaugen masonrysresistancetodrivingrainmortarwatercontentandimpregnation
AT jardarlohne masonrysresistancetodrivingrainmortarwatercontentandimpregnation