Against method: Exploding the boundary between qualitative and quantitative studies of science

AbstractQuantitative and qualitative studies of science have historically played radically different roles with opposing epistemological commitments. Using large-scale text analysis, we see that qualitative studies generate and value new theory, especially regarding the complex socia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Donghyun Kang, James Evans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The MIT Press 2020-01-01
Series:Quantitative Science Studies
Online Access:https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/1/3/930/96099/Against-method-Exploding-the-boundary-between
_version_ 1818271331405266944
author Donghyun Kang
James Evans
author_facet Donghyun Kang
James Evans
author_sort Donghyun Kang
collection DOAJ
description AbstractQuantitative and qualitative studies of science have historically played radically different roles with opposing epistemological commitments. Using large-scale text analysis, we see that qualitative studies generate and value new theory, especially regarding the complex social and political contexts of scientific action, while quantitative approaches confirm existing theory and evaluate the performance of scientific institutions. Large-scale digital data and emerging computational methods could allow us to refigure these positions, turning qualitative artifacts into quantitative patterns into qualitative insights across many scales, heralding a new era of theory development, engagement, and relevance for scientists, policy-makers, and society.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T21:24:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dc6ce7f717974a5f8bf5f88546dda290
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2641-3337
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T21:24:29Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher The MIT Press
record_format Article
series Quantitative Science Studies
spelling doaj.art-dc6ce7f717974a5f8bf5f88546dda2902022-12-22T00:11:30ZengThe MIT PressQuantitative Science Studies2641-33372020-01-011393094410.1162/qss_a_00056Against method: Exploding the boundary between qualitative and quantitative studies of scienceDonghyun Kang0http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6241-8910James Evans1http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9838-0707Sociology Department, University of ChicagoSociology Department, University of Chicago AbstractQuantitative and qualitative studies of science have historically played radically different roles with opposing epistemological commitments. Using large-scale text analysis, we see that qualitative studies generate and value new theory, especially regarding the complex social and political contexts of scientific action, while quantitative approaches confirm existing theory and evaluate the performance of scientific institutions. Large-scale digital data and emerging computational methods could allow us to refigure these positions, turning qualitative artifacts into quantitative patterns into qualitative insights across many scales, heralding a new era of theory development, engagement, and relevance for scientists, policy-makers, and society.https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/1/3/930/96099/Against-method-Exploding-the-boundary-between
spellingShingle Donghyun Kang
James Evans
Against method: Exploding the boundary between qualitative and quantitative studies of science
Quantitative Science Studies
title Against method: Exploding the boundary between qualitative and quantitative studies of science
title_full Against method: Exploding the boundary between qualitative and quantitative studies of science
title_fullStr Against method: Exploding the boundary between qualitative and quantitative studies of science
title_full_unstemmed Against method: Exploding the boundary between qualitative and quantitative studies of science
title_short Against method: Exploding the boundary between qualitative and quantitative studies of science
title_sort against method exploding the boundary between qualitative and quantitative studies of science
url https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/1/3/930/96099/Against-method-Exploding-the-boundary-between
work_keys_str_mv AT donghyunkang againstmethodexplodingtheboundarybetweenqualitativeandquantitativestudiesofscience
AT jamesevans againstmethodexplodingtheboundarybetweenqualitativeandquantitativestudiesofscience