Comparing recruitment strategies to engage hard‐to‐reach men who have sex with men living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads in four US cities: Results from HPTN 078

Abstract Introduction There is an urgent need to identify men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads to prevent transmission. Though respondent‐driven sampling (RDS) is traditionally used for hard‐to‐reach populations, we compare how RDS and direct recruitment (DR)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chris Beyrer, Jowanna Malone, Stefan Baral, Zhe Wang, Carlos Del Rio, Kenneth H. Mayer, D. Scott Batey, Jason Farley, Theresa Gamble, Jill Stanton, James P. Hughes, Ethan Wilson, Risha Irvin, Oscar Guevara‐Perez, Adam Bocek, Josh Bruce, Ronald Gaston, Vanessa Cummings, Robert H. Remien, the HPTN 078 Study Team
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of the International AIDS Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25798
_version_ 1828013200916873216
author Chris Beyrer
Jowanna Malone
Stefan Baral
Zhe Wang
Carlos Del Rio
Kenneth H. Mayer
D. Scott Batey
Jason Farley
Theresa Gamble
Jill Stanton
James P. Hughes
Ethan Wilson
Risha Irvin
Oscar Guevara‐Perez
Adam Bocek
Josh Bruce
Ronald Gaston
Vanessa Cummings
Robert H. Remien
the HPTN 078 Study Team
author_facet Chris Beyrer
Jowanna Malone
Stefan Baral
Zhe Wang
Carlos Del Rio
Kenneth H. Mayer
D. Scott Batey
Jason Farley
Theresa Gamble
Jill Stanton
James P. Hughes
Ethan Wilson
Risha Irvin
Oscar Guevara‐Perez
Adam Bocek
Josh Bruce
Ronald Gaston
Vanessa Cummings
Robert H. Remien
the HPTN 078 Study Team
author_sort Chris Beyrer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction There is an urgent need to identify men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads to prevent transmission. Though respondent‐driven sampling (RDS) is traditionally used for hard‐to‐reach populations, we compare how RDS and direct recruitment (DR) perform in identifying MSM living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads and identifying MSM with socio‐demographics characteristic of hard‐to‐reach populations. Methods This is a cross‐sectional analysis among 1305 MSM who were recruited from March 2016 to December 2017 for a case management intervention trial (HPTN 078). We recruited participants across four cities using RDS and DR methods: Birmingham, AL; Atlanta, GA; Baltimore, MD; and Boston, MA. Participants completed a socio‐demographic questionnaire and underwent HIV testing. We compare the proportion of MSM with HIV and unsuppressed viral loads (HIV RNA ≥ 1000 copies/ml) based on recruitment method using Pearson chi‐square tests. We also compare differences in race, income, healthcare coverage, education, sexual orientation, hidden sexuality and comfort with participating in the LGBT community between recruitment methods and perform non‐parametric trend tests to see how demographics change across RDS recruitment waves. Results RDS recruited 721 men (55.2%) and DR yielded 584 men (44.8%). Overall, 69% were living with HIV, of whom 18% were not virally suppressed. HIV prevalence was higher among those recruited via DR (84%) compared to RDS (58%), p < 0.0001. Twenty per cent of DR recruits were not virally suppressed compared to 15% of RDS, though this was not significant. DR yielded a significantly higher proportion of Black participants and those with less than a high school diploma. The prevalence of low income, no healthcare coverage, bisexuality and hidden sexuality increased across RDS waves. Conclusions DR was more efficient in identifying MSM living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads; however, there was a higher proportion of hard‐to‐reach MSM who were low income, lacked health coverage, were bisexual and were not open with their sexuality in deeper waves of RDS. Researchers should consider supplementing RDS recruitment with DR efforts if aiming to identify MSM with unsuppressed viral loads via RDS.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:42:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dc7cded04192431fbdf0cce9e7f1ec51
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1758-2652
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:42:36Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the International AIDS Society
spelling doaj.art-dc7cded04192431fbdf0cce9e7f1ec512023-02-17T07:55:39ZengWileyJournal of the International AIDS Society1758-26522021-09-01249n/an/a10.1002/jia2.25798Comparing recruitment strategies to engage hard‐to‐reach men who have sex with men living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads in four US cities: Results from HPTN 078Chris Beyrer0Jowanna Malone1Stefan Baral2Zhe Wang3Carlos Del Rio4Kenneth H. Mayer5D. Scott Batey6Jason Farley7Theresa Gamble8Jill Stanton9James P. Hughes10Ethan Wilson11Risha Irvin12Oscar Guevara‐Perez13Adam Bocek14Josh Bruce15Ronald Gaston16Vanessa Cummings17Robert H. Remien18the HPTN 078 Study Team19Department of Epidemiology Center for Public Health and Human Rights Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USADepartment of Epidemiology Center for Public Health and Human Rights Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USADepartment of Epidemiology Center for Public Health and Human Rights Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USAStatisticalCenter for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention Seattle Washington USADepartment of Epidemiology Emory Center for AIDS Research Atlanta Georgia USABeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USADepartment of Social Work University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USASchool of Nursing Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USAHPTN Leadership and Operations Center FHI 360 Durham North Carolina USAHPTN Leadership and Operations Center FHI 360 Durham North Carolina USADepartment of Biostatistics University of Washington Seattle Washington USAStatisticalCenter for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention Seattle Washington USADepartment of Epidemiology Center for Public Health and Human Rights Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USAThe Fenway Institute Boston Massachusetts USADepartment of Epidemiology Center for Public Health and Human Rights Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USADepartment of Social Work University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USADepartment of Epidemiology Emory Center for AIDS Research Atlanta Georgia USADepartment of Pathology Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USAHIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies NY State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University New York New York USADepartment of Epidemiology Center for Public Health and Human Rights Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USAAbstract Introduction There is an urgent need to identify men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads to prevent transmission. Though respondent‐driven sampling (RDS) is traditionally used for hard‐to‐reach populations, we compare how RDS and direct recruitment (DR) perform in identifying MSM living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads and identifying MSM with socio‐demographics characteristic of hard‐to‐reach populations. Methods This is a cross‐sectional analysis among 1305 MSM who were recruited from March 2016 to December 2017 for a case management intervention trial (HPTN 078). We recruited participants across four cities using RDS and DR methods: Birmingham, AL; Atlanta, GA; Baltimore, MD; and Boston, MA. Participants completed a socio‐demographic questionnaire and underwent HIV testing. We compare the proportion of MSM with HIV and unsuppressed viral loads (HIV RNA ≥ 1000 copies/ml) based on recruitment method using Pearson chi‐square tests. We also compare differences in race, income, healthcare coverage, education, sexual orientation, hidden sexuality and comfort with participating in the LGBT community between recruitment methods and perform non‐parametric trend tests to see how demographics change across RDS recruitment waves. Results RDS recruited 721 men (55.2%) and DR yielded 584 men (44.8%). Overall, 69% were living with HIV, of whom 18% were not virally suppressed. HIV prevalence was higher among those recruited via DR (84%) compared to RDS (58%), p < 0.0001. Twenty per cent of DR recruits were not virally suppressed compared to 15% of RDS, though this was not significant. DR yielded a significantly higher proportion of Black participants and those with less than a high school diploma. The prevalence of low income, no healthcare coverage, bisexuality and hidden sexuality increased across RDS waves. Conclusions DR was more efficient in identifying MSM living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads; however, there was a higher proportion of hard‐to‐reach MSM who were low income, lacked health coverage, were bisexual and were not open with their sexuality in deeper waves of RDS. Researchers should consider supplementing RDS recruitment with DR efforts if aiming to identify MSM with unsuppressed viral loads via RDS.https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25798ARVco‐infectionHIV epidemiologymen who have sex with menrecruitmentviral suppression
spellingShingle Chris Beyrer
Jowanna Malone
Stefan Baral
Zhe Wang
Carlos Del Rio
Kenneth H. Mayer
D. Scott Batey
Jason Farley
Theresa Gamble
Jill Stanton
James P. Hughes
Ethan Wilson
Risha Irvin
Oscar Guevara‐Perez
Adam Bocek
Josh Bruce
Ronald Gaston
Vanessa Cummings
Robert H. Remien
the HPTN 078 Study Team
Comparing recruitment strategies to engage hard‐to‐reach men who have sex with men living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads in four US cities: Results from HPTN 078
Journal of the International AIDS Society
ARV
co‐infection
HIV epidemiology
men who have sex with men
recruitment
viral suppression
title Comparing recruitment strategies to engage hard‐to‐reach men who have sex with men living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads in four US cities: Results from HPTN 078
title_full Comparing recruitment strategies to engage hard‐to‐reach men who have sex with men living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads in four US cities: Results from HPTN 078
title_fullStr Comparing recruitment strategies to engage hard‐to‐reach men who have sex with men living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads in four US cities: Results from HPTN 078
title_full_unstemmed Comparing recruitment strategies to engage hard‐to‐reach men who have sex with men living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads in four US cities: Results from HPTN 078
title_short Comparing recruitment strategies to engage hard‐to‐reach men who have sex with men living with HIV with unsuppressed viral loads in four US cities: Results from HPTN 078
title_sort comparing recruitment strategies to engage hard to reach men who have sex with men living with hiv with unsuppressed viral loads in four us cities results from hptn 078
topic ARV
co‐infection
HIV epidemiology
men who have sex with men
recruitment
viral suppression
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25798
work_keys_str_mv AT chrisbeyrer comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT jowannamalone comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT stefanbaral comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT zhewang comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT carlosdelrio comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT kennethhmayer comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT dscottbatey comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT jasonfarley comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT theresagamble comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT jillstanton comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT jamesphughes comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT ethanwilson comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT rishairvin comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT oscarguevaraperez comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT adambocek comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT joshbruce comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT ronaldgaston comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT vanessacummings comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT roberthremien comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078
AT thehptn078studyteam comparingrecruitmentstrategiestoengagehardtoreachmenwhohavesexwithmenlivingwithhivwithunsuppressedviralloadsinfouruscitiesresultsfromhptn078