Life cycle assessment of biowaste treatment – Considering uncertainties in emission factors

The present paper provides an environmental assessment and ranking of different treatment options for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), which is a biowaste that typically contains food- and green-waste. The main biochemical treatment systems for OFMSW are composting (by-product:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steffen Lewerenz, Gregor Sailer, Stefan Pelz, Hendrik Lambrecht
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-08-01
Series:Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790823000563
_version_ 1797796154601111552
author Steffen Lewerenz
Gregor Sailer
Stefan Pelz
Hendrik Lambrecht
author_facet Steffen Lewerenz
Gregor Sailer
Stefan Pelz
Hendrik Lambrecht
author_sort Steffen Lewerenz
collection DOAJ
description The present paper provides an environmental assessment and ranking of different treatment options for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), which is a biowaste that typically contains food- and green-waste. The main biochemical treatment systems for OFMSW are composting (by-product: fertilizer) and anaerobic digestion (by-products: biogas and digestate), which are often combined in practice. Total impact scores as evaluated by means of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) with the Ecological Scarcity Method range from 8 to 31 eco-points for Germany (EPG) per kg treated OFMSW with “Global Warming” and “Main Air Pollutants” (such as NH3) as main environmental impacts. In spite of significant uncertainties in the available emission data, the subsequent application of a Monte Carlo Analysis provides a robust ranking of the treatment systems. The analysis reveals that the transportation distance is a crucial factor to increase the ecological benefit of an OFMSW treatment system. Consequently, decentral structures with short transportation distances (e.g. 17 km) as well as an optimal plant operation mode are more important to reduce emissions than the choice of the treatment system itself. Further research should focus on monitoring campaigns to generate better representative operational datasets for the different types of OFMSW treatment plants such as plug-flow or batch digestion systems as well as for the composting technologies.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:28:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dc891f3da95b4e90996d8b6c378ac737
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-7908
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:28:49Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Cleaner Engineering and Technology
spelling doaj.art-dc891f3da95b4e90996d8b6c378ac7372023-06-25T04:44:02ZengElsevierCleaner Engineering and Technology2666-79082023-08-0115100651Life cycle assessment of biowaste treatment – Considering uncertainties in emission factorsSteffen Lewerenz0Gregor Sailer1Stefan Pelz2Hendrik Lambrecht3Institute for Industrial Ecology, Pforzheim University, Tiefenbronner Str. 65, 75175, Pforzheim, Germany; Corresponding author.State Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Bioenergy, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 9, 70599, Stuttgart, GermanyDepartment of Bioenergy, University of Applied Forest Sciences Rottenburg, Schadenweilerhof 1, 72108, Rottenburg am Neckar, GermanyInstitute for Industrial Ecology, Pforzheim University, Tiefenbronner Str. 65, 75175, Pforzheim, GermanyThe present paper provides an environmental assessment and ranking of different treatment options for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW), which is a biowaste that typically contains food- and green-waste. The main biochemical treatment systems for OFMSW are composting (by-product: fertilizer) and anaerobic digestion (by-products: biogas and digestate), which are often combined in practice. Total impact scores as evaluated by means of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) with the Ecological Scarcity Method range from 8 to 31 eco-points for Germany (EPG) per kg treated OFMSW with “Global Warming” and “Main Air Pollutants” (such as NH3) as main environmental impacts. In spite of significant uncertainties in the available emission data, the subsequent application of a Monte Carlo Analysis provides a robust ranking of the treatment systems. The analysis reveals that the transportation distance is a crucial factor to increase the ecological benefit of an OFMSW treatment system. Consequently, decentral structures with short transportation distances (e.g. 17 km) as well as an optimal plant operation mode are more important to reduce emissions than the choice of the treatment system itself. Further research should focus on monitoring campaigns to generate better representative operational datasets for the different types of OFMSW treatment plants such as plug-flow or batch digestion systems as well as for the composting technologies.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790823000563Life cycle assessmentOFMSW treatmentAnaerobic digestionBiogasEcological scarcity methodMonte Carlo analysis
spellingShingle Steffen Lewerenz
Gregor Sailer
Stefan Pelz
Hendrik Lambrecht
Life cycle assessment of biowaste treatment – Considering uncertainties in emission factors
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Life cycle assessment
OFMSW treatment
Anaerobic digestion
Biogas
Ecological scarcity method
Monte Carlo analysis
title Life cycle assessment of biowaste treatment – Considering uncertainties in emission factors
title_full Life cycle assessment of biowaste treatment – Considering uncertainties in emission factors
title_fullStr Life cycle assessment of biowaste treatment – Considering uncertainties in emission factors
title_full_unstemmed Life cycle assessment of biowaste treatment – Considering uncertainties in emission factors
title_short Life cycle assessment of biowaste treatment – Considering uncertainties in emission factors
title_sort life cycle assessment of biowaste treatment considering uncertainties in emission factors
topic Life cycle assessment
OFMSW treatment
Anaerobic digestion
Biogas
Ecological scarcity method
Monte Carlo analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790823000563
work_keys_str_mv AT steffenlewerenz lifecycleassessmentofbiowastetreatmentconsideringuncertaintiesinemissionfactors
AT gregorsailer lifecycleassessmentofbiowastetreatmentconsideringuncertaintiesinemissionfactors
AT stefanpelz lifecycleassessmentofbiowastetreatmentconsideringuncertaintiesinemissionfactors
AT hendriklambrecht lifecycleassessmentofbiowastetreatmentconsideringuncertaintiesinemissionfactors