DNA repeat arrays in chicken and human genomes and the adaptive evolution of avian genome size
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Birds have smaller average genome sizes than other tetrapod classes, and it has been proposed that a relatively low frequency of repeating DNA is one factor in reduction of avian genome sizes.</p> <p>Results</p> <...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2005-02-01
|
| Series: | BMC Evolutionary Biology |
| Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/5/12 |
| _version_ | 1798029202412273664 |
|---|---|
| author | Piontkivska Helen Hughes Austin L |
| author_facet | Piontkivska Helen Hughes Austin L |
| author_sort | Piontkivska Helen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Birds have smaller average genome sizes than other tetrapod classes, and it has been proposed that a relatively low frequency of repeating DNA is one factor in reduction of avian genome sizes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>DNA repeat arrays in the sequenced portion of the chicken (<it>Gallus gallus</it>) autosomes were quantified and compared with those in human autosomes. In the chicken 10.3% of the genome was occupied by DNA repeats, in contrast to 44.9% in human. In the chicken, the percentage of a chromosome occupied by repeats was positively correlated with chromosome length, but even the largest chicken chromosomes had repeat densities much lower than those in human, indicating that avoidance of repeats in the chicken is not confined to minichromosomes. When 294 simple sequence repeat types shared between chicken and human genomes were compared, mean repeat array length and maximum repeat array length were significantly lower in the chicken than in human.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The fact that the chicken simple sequence repeat arrays were consistently smaller than arrays of the same type in human is evidence that the reduction in repeat array length in the chicken has involved numerous independent evolutionary events. This implies that reduction of DNA repeats in birds is the result of adaptive evolution. Reduction of DNA repeats on minichromosomes may be an adaptation to permit chiasma formation and alignment of small chromosomes. However, the fact that repeat array lengths are consistently reduced on the largest chicken chromosomes supports the hypothesis that other selective factors are at work, presumably related to the reduction of cell size and consequent advantages for the energetic demands of flight.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T19:20:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-dca8e57362924001b7a65dbe1a711690 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2148 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T19:20:30Z |
| publishDate | 2005-02-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Evolutionary Biology |
| spelling | doaj.art-dca8e57362924001b7a65dbe1a7116902022-12-22T04:07:19ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482005-02-01511210.1186/1471-2148-5-12DNA repeat arrays in chicken and human genomes and the adaptive evolution of avian genome sizePiontkivska HelenHughes Austin L<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Birds have smaller average genome sizes than other tetrapod classes, and it has been proposed that a relatively low frequency of repeating DNA is one factor in reduction of avian genome sizes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>DNA repeat arrays in the sequenced portion of the chicken (<it>Gallus gallus</it>) autosomes were quantified and compared with those in human autosomes. In the chicken 10.3% of the genome was occupied by DNA repeats, in contrast to 44.9% in human. In the chicken, the percentage of a chromosome occupied by repeats was positively correlated with chromosome length, but even the largest chicken chromosomes had repeat densities much lower than those in human, indicating that avoidance of repeats in the chicken is not confined to minichromosomes. When 294 simple sequence repeat types shared between chicken and human genomes were compared, mean repeat array length and maximum repeat array length were significantly lower in the chicken than in human.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The fact that the chicken simple sequence repeat arrays were consistently smaller than arrays of the same type in human is evidence that the reduction in repeat array length in the chicken has involved numerous independent evolutionary events. This implies that reduction of DNA repeats in birds is the result of adaptive evolution. Reduction of DNA repeats on minichromosomes may be an adaptation to permit chiasma formation and alignment of small chromosomes. However, the fact that repeat array lengths are consistently reduced on the largest chicken chromosomes supports the hypothesis that other selective factors are at work, presumably related to the reduction of cell size and consequent advantages for the energetic demands of flight.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/5/12 |
| spellingShingle | Piontkivska Helen Hughes Austin L DNA repeat arrays in chicken and human genomes and the adaptive evolution of avian genome size BMC Evolutionary Biology |
| title | DNA repeat arrays in chicken and human genomes and the adaptive evolution of avian genome size |
| title_full | DNA repeat arrays in chicken and human genomes and the adaptive evolution of avian genome size |
| title_fullStr | DNA repeat arrays in chicken and human genomes and the adaptive evolution of avian genome size |
| title_full_unstemmed | DNA repeat arrays in chicken and human genomes and the adaptive evolution of avian genome size |
| title_short | DNA repeat arrays in chicken and human genomes and the adaptive evolution of avian genome size |
| title_sort | dna repeat arrays in chicken and human genomes and the adaptive evolution of avian genome size |
| url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/5/12 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT piontkivskahelen dnarepeatarraysinchickenandhumangenomesandtheadaptiveevolutionofaviangenomesize AT hughesaustinl dnarepeatarraysinchickenandhumangenomesandtheadaptiveevolutionofaviangenomesize |