Facetten von Sicherheit und Unsicherheit. Welches Bild von Terrorismus, Kriminalität und Katastrophen zeigen die Medien?.

How do the media portray terrorism, crime, and catastrophes? Investigating this aspect of media reality, 12,000 articles and programmes of 13 media outlets (including television, the press, and the Internet) were studied over a period of 18 months. With regard to five different notions of security w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philipp Henn, Gerhard Vowe
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2015-09-01
Series:Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft
Online Access:https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/1615-634X-2015-3-341
_version_ 1797329093260214272
author Philipp Henn
Gerhard Vowe
author_facet Philipp Henn
Gerhard Vowe
author_sort Philipp Henn
collection DOAJ
description How do the media portray terrorism, crime, and catastrophes? Investigating this aspect of media reality, 12,000 articles and programmes of 13 media outlets (including television, the press, and the Internet) were studied over a period of 18 months. With regard to five different notions of security within the coverage, the results are as follows. (1) Significance: the coverage on terrorism, crime, and catastrophes constitute around 15 to 27 percent of the total media coverage; yet there are differences between the different media genres. Crime as a subject is reported on rather constantly, while key events seem more important to the coverage of terrorism and catastrophes. (2) Reference to issues: the overall coverage of terrorism and crime focuses on security activities, while reports on catastrophes focus on damages - again with differences between the diverse media genres. (3) Reference to time: the majority of the coverage focuses on current events, while past and future events are less important. (4) Reference to location: crime is portrayed as an issue close-to-home; catastrophes are in the distance; and terrorism seems to have come closer - this is a comprehensive find across all media genres under investigation. (5) Reference to actors: politics and politicians (among others) are nearly always depicted as responsible. In general, we demonstrate that a faceted coverage can be found with regards to subjects, media genres, and time. Yet, the patterns found do not allow for global statements about security coverage in the media.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T07:00:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dcbabf45de16464e82ce4835d0d4d6ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1615-634X
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-08T07:00:16Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
record_format Article
series Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft
spelling doaj.art-dcbabf45de16464e82ce4835d0d4d6ed2024-02-03T06:08:11ZdeuNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KGMedien & Kommunikationswissenschaft1615-634X2015-09-0163334136210.5771/1615-634X-2015-3-3411057711615634X20153341Facetten von Sicherheit und Unsicherheit. Welches Bild von Terrorismus, Kriminalität und Katastrophen zeigen die Medien?.Philipp HennGerhard VoweHow do the media portray terrorism, crime, and catastrophes? Investigating this aspect of media reality, 12,000 articles and programmes of 13 media outlets (including television, the press, and the Internet) were studied over a period of 18 months. With regard to five different notions of security within the coverage, the results are as follows. (1) Significance: the coverage on terrorism, crime, and catastrophes constitute around 15 to 27 percent of the total media coverage; yet there are differences between the different media genres. Crime as a subject is reported on rather constantly, while key events seem more important to the coverage of terrorism and catastrophes. (2) Reference to issues: the overall coverage of terrorism and crime focuses on security activities, while reports on catastrophes focus on damages - again with differences between the diverse media genres. (3) Reference to time: the majority of the coverage focuses on current events, while past and future events are less important. (4) Reference to location: crime is portrayed as an issue close-to-home; catastrophes are in the distance; and terrorism seems to have come closer - this is a comprehensive find across all media genres under investigation. (5) Reference to actors: politics and politicians (among others) are nearly always depicted as responsible. In general, we demonstrate that a faceted coverage can be found with regards to subjects, media genres, and time. Yet, the patterns found do not allow for global statements about security coverage in the media.https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/1615-634X-2015-3-341
spellingShingle Philipp Henn
Gerhard Vowe
Facetten von Sicherheit und Unsicherheit. Welches Bild von Terrorismus, Kriminalität und Katastrophen zeigen die Medien?.
Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft
title Facetten von Sicherheit und Unsicherheit. Welches Bild von Terrorismus, Kriminalität und Katastrophen zeigen die Medien?.
title_full Facetten von Sicherheit und Unsicherheit. Welches Bild von Terrorismus, Kriminalität und Katastrophen zeigen die Medien?.
title_fullStr Facetten von Sicherheit und Unsicherheit. Welches Bild von Terrorismus, Kriminalität und Katastrophen zeigen die Medien?.
title_full_unstemmed Facetten von Sicherheit und Unsicherheit. Welches Bild von Terrorismus, Kriminalität und Katastrophen zeigen die Medien?.
title_short Facetten von Sicherheit und Unsicherheit. Welches Bild von Terrorismus, Kriminalität und Katastrophen zeigen die Medien?.
title_sort facetten von sicherheit und unsicherheit welches bild von terrorismus kriminalitat und katastrophen zeigen die medien
url https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/1615-634X-2015-3-341
work_keys_str_mv AT philipphenn facettenvonsicherheitundunsicherheitwelchesbildvonterrorismuskriminalitatundkatastrophenzeigendiemedien
AT gerhardvowe facettenvonsicherheitundunsicherheitwelchesbildvonterrorismuskriminalitatundkatastrophenzeigendiemedien