Comparison of Quebec’s Project Delivery Methods: Relational Contract Law and Differences in Contractual Language

The province of Quebec, Canada, seeks to implement relational alternate project delivery methods to achieve sustainability and energy efficiency in public construction. However, the relational differences between the formal written parts of different delivery methods have yet to be analyzed and unde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriel Jobidon, Pierre Lemieux, Robert Beauregard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Laws
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/8/2/9
_version_ 1828277066178494464
author Gabriel Jobidon
Pierre Lemieux
Robert Beauregard
author_facet Gabriel Jobidon
Pierre Lemieux
Robert Beauregard
author_sort Gabriel Jobidon
collection DOAJ
description The province of Quebec, Canada, seeks to implement relational alternate project delivery methods to achieve sustainability and energy efficiency in public construction. However, the relational differences between the formal written parts of different delivery methods have yet to be analyzed and understood, as is the case with the relational aspects of contracts and the achievement of sustainable and energy-efficient infrastructure. Using a hermeneutic interpretation of Macneil’s relational contract norms and grounded theory, 26 contracts involving Quebec’s largest public client of vertical infrastructure and representing three different types of project delivery methods (design–bid–build (DBB), design–Build (DB), and construction manager–general contractor/integrated project delivery (CMGC/IPD)) were analyzed using NVivo. It was found that CMGC/IPD is the most relational project delivery method available to Quebec’s public clients, namely because of the public client’s active involvement in the realization process, the increasing complexity of roles, the multitude of common management structures, and the internalization of sustainability measures and conflict resolution. Furthermore, Quebec’s CMGC/IPD was found to be an IPD-ish delivery method, lacking the early involvement of the construction manager and the risk/reward sharing mechanisms necessary to achieve pure IPD status. The findings and theoretical considerations discussed here will help policymakers, contract drafters, and public clients interested in implementing relational contracting practices in public construction projects.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:08:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dcde5a5266854d41ab13e81382fa5bd9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-471X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:08:17Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Laws
spelling doaj.art-dcde5a5266854d41ab13e81382fa5bd92022-12-22T02:56:57ZengMDPI AGLaws2075-471X2019-04-0182910.3390/laws8020009laws8020009Comparison of Quebec’s Project Delivery Methods: Relational Contract Law and Differences in Contractual LanguageGabriel Jobidon0Pierre Lemieux1Robert Beauregard2CIRCERB–CRMR, Faculty of Law, Université Laval, 2325 Rue de l’Université, Ville de Québec, QC G1V 0A6, CanadaFaculty of Law, Université Laval, 2325 Rue de l’Université, Ville de Québec, QC G1V 0A6, CanadaAcademic and Student Affairs, Université Laval, 2320 Rue des Bibliothèques, Ville de Québec, QC G1V 0A6, CanadaThe province of Quebec, Canada, seeks to implement relational alternate project delivery methods to achieve sustainability and energy efficiency in public construction. However, the relational differences between the formal written parts of different delivery methods have yet to be analyzed and understood, as is the case with the relational aspects of contracts and the achievement of sustainable and energy-efficient infrastructure. Using a hermeneutic interpretation of Macneil’s relational contract norms and grounded theory, 26 contracts involving Quebec’s largest public client of vertical infrastructure and representing three different types of project delivery methods (design–bid–build (DBB), design–Build (DB), and construction manager–general contractor/integrated project delivery (CMGC/IPD)) were analyzed using NVivo. It was found that CMGC/IPD is the most relational project delivery method available to Quebec’s public clients, namely because of the public client’s active involvement in the realization process, the increasing complexity of roles, the multitude of common management structures, and the internalization of sustainability measures and conflict resolution. Furthermore, Quebec’s CMGC/IPD was found to be an IPD-ish delivery method, lacking the early involvement of the construction manager and the risk/reward sharing mechanisms necessary to achieve pure IPD status. The findings and theoretical considerations discussed here will help policymakers, contract drafters, and public clients interested in implementing relational contracting practices in public construction projects.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/8/2/9public procurementproject delivery methodsintegrated project deliveryrelational contractscontractual languagesustainable infrastructureenergy efficiency
spellingShingle Gabriel Jobidon
Pierre Lemieux
Robert Beauregard
Comparison of Quebec’s Project Delivery Methods: Relational Contract Law and Differences in Contractual Language
Laws
public procurement
project delivery methods
integrated project delivery
relational contracts
contractual language
sustainable infrastructure
energy efficiency
title Comparison of Quebec’s Project Delivery Methods: Relational Contract Law and Differences in Contractual Language
title_full Comparison of Quebec’s Project Delivery Methods: Relational Contract Law and Differences in Contractual Language
title_fullStr Comparison of Quebec’s Project Delivery Methods: Relational Contract Law and Differences in Contractual Language
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Quebec’s Project Delivery Methods: Relational Contract Law and Differences in Contractual Language
title_short Comparison of Quebec’s Project Delivery Methods: Relational Contract Law and Differences in Contractual Language
title_sort comparison of quebec s project delivery methods relational contract law and differences in contractual language
topic public procurement
project delivery methods
integrated project delivery
relational contracts
contractual language
sustainable infrastructure
energy efficiency
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/8/2/9
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrieljobidon comparisonofquebecsprojectdeliverymethodsrelationalcontractlawanddifferencesincontractuallanguage
AT pierrelemieux comparisonofquebecsprojectdeliverymethodsrelationalcontractlawanddifferencesincontractuallanguage
AT robertbeauregard comparisonofquebecsprojectdeliverymethodsrelationalcontractlawanddifferencesincontractuallanguage