Evaluation of seaports’ investment attractiveness
Ukraine’s European integration requires the involvement of seaports in the international TEN-T network, so it is extremely important to create favorable investment conditions to develop port infrastructure. This study aims to make a comprehensive assessment of the seaports’ investment attractiveness...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"
2020-09-01
|
| Series: | Investment Management & Financial Innovations |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/14000/IMFI_2020_03_Palyvoda.pdf |
| _version_ | 1826907615009964032 |
|---|---|
| author | Olena Palyvoda Oksana Karpenko Valentyna Vlasova Nataliia Bondar Olga Mishulina |
| author_facet | Olena Palyvoda Oksana Karpenko Valentyna Vlasova Nataliia Bondar Olga Mishulina |
| author_sort | Olena Palyvoda |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Ukraine’s European integration requires the involvement of seaports in the international TEN-T network, so it is extremely important to create favorable investment conditions to develop port infrastructure. This study aims to make a comprehensive assessment of the seaports’ investment attractiveness to use it for increasing the efficiency of attracting investment in the development of Ukrainian seaports, which are part of the European transport network. The study was conducted using the Saati method and the method of calculating the integrated indicator of seaports’ investment attractiveness. The integrated indicator includes assessing indicators of business activity in the region and consolidated indicators of financial and property status, logistical attractiveness, and prospects for port development. According to the results of calculations, the seaports of Ukraine were divided into three groups. The ports of Yuzhne, Odesa, Illichivsk, and Mykolaiv have a high level of investment attractiveness. The ratio of investment attractiveness ranges from 3 to 2.6. The ports of Izmail, Mariupol, Oktyabrsk, and Kherson have an average level (ratio from 2.2 to 1), and other ports have a low investment attractiveness (coefficient from 0.9 to 0.7). |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T12:19:44Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-dcec7ba943cb489eb05f718676ac26a6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1810-4967 1812-9358 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-17T09:08:38Z |
| publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
| publisher | LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives" |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Investment Management & Financial Innovations |
| spelling | doaj.art-dcec7ba943cb489eb05f718676ac26a62025-01-02T16:07:55ZengLLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"Investment Management & Financial Innovations1810-49671812-93582020-09-0117316017410.21511/imfi.17(3).2020.1314000Evaluation of seaports’ investment attractivenessOlena Palyvoda0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9714-9765Oksana Karpenko1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2943-1982Valentyna Vlasova2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-101XNataliia Bondar3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8254-2449Olga Mishulina4Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of Management of Foreign Economic Activity of Enterprises, National Aviation UniversityDoctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of Management and Public Administration, State University of Infrastructure and TechnologyPh.D. in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Management and Public Administration, State University of Infrastructure and TechnologyDoctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Economics, National University of TransportDoctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of Economics, Kostanay Branch of Chelyabinsk State UniversityUkraine’s European integration requires the involvement of seaports in the international TEN-T network, so it is extremely important to create favorable investment conditions to develop port infrastructure. This study aims to make a comprehensive assessment of the seaports’ investment attractiveness to use it for increasing the efficiency of attracting investment in the development of Ukrainian seaports, which are part of the European transport network. The study was conducted using the Saati method and the method of calculating the integrated indicator of seaports’ investment attractiveness. The integrated indicator includes assessing indicators of business activity in the region and consolidated indicators of financial and property status, logistical attractiveness, and prospects for port development. According to the results of calculations, the seaports of Ukraine were divided into three groups. The ports of Yuzhne, Odesa, Illichivsk, and Mykolaiv have a high level of investment attractiveness. The ratio of investment attractiveness ranges from 3 to 2.6. The ports of Izmail, Mariupol, Oktyabrsk, and Kherson have an average level (ratio from 2.2 to 1), and other ports have a low investment attractiveness (coefficient from 0.9 to 0.7).https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/14000/IMFI_2020_03_Palyvoda.pdfintegrated indicatorinvestment conditionsinvestmentsport infrastructureseaport of Ukraine |
| spellingShingle | Olena Palyvoda Oksana Karpenko Valentyna Vlasova Nataliia Bondar Olga Mishulina Evaluation of seaports’ investment attractiveness Investment Management & Financial Innovations integrated indicator investment conditions investments port infrastructure seaport of Ukraine |
| title | Evaluation of seaports’ investment attractiveness |
| title_full | Evaluation of seaports’ investment attractiveness |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of seaports’ investment attractiveness |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of seaports’ investment attractiveness |
| title_short | Evaluation of seaports’ investment attractiveness |
| title_sort | evaluation of seaports investment attractiveness |
| topic | integrated indicator investment conditions investments port infrastructure seaport of Ukraine |
| url | https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/14000/IMFI_2020_03_Palyvoda.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT olenapalyvoda evaluationofseaportsinvestmentattractiveness AT oksanakarpenko evaluationofseaportsinvestmentattractiveness AT valentynavlasova evaluationofseaportsinvestmentattractiveness AT nataliiabondar evaluationofseaportsinvestmentattractiveness AT olgamishulina evaluationofseaportsinvestmentattractiveness |