Modified influenza M158–66 peptide vaccination induces non-relevant T-cells and may enhance pathology after challenge

Abstract CD8 + T cells are promising targets for vaccination against influenza A virus (IAV) infection. Their induction via peptide vaccination is not trivial, because peptides are weakly immunogenic. One strategy to overcome this is by vaccination with chemically enhanced altered peptide ligands (C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Josien Lanfermeijer, Koen van de Ven, Harry van Dijken, Marion Hendriks, Cami M. P. Talavera Ormeño, Femke de Heij, Paul Roholl, José A. M. Borghans, Debbie van Baarle, Jørgen de Jonge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-08-01
Series:npj Vaccines
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-023-00705-y
_version_ 1827724882240077824
author Josien Lanfermeijer
Koen van de Ven
Harry van Dijken
Marion Hendriks
Cami M. P. Talavera Ormeño
Femke de Heij
Paul Roholl
José A. M. Borghans
Debbie van Baarle
Jørgen de Jonge
author_facet Josien Lanfermeijer
Koen van de Ven
Harry van Dijken
Marion Hendriks
Cami M. P. Talavera Ormeño
Femke de Heij
Paul Roholl
José A. M. Borghans
Debbie van Baarle
Jørgen de Jonge
author_sort Josien Lanfermeijer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract CD8 + T cells are promising targets for vaccination against influenza A virus (IAV) infection. Their induction via peptide vaccination is not trivial, because peptides are weakly immunogenic. One strategy to overcome this is by vaccination with chemically enhanced altered peptide ligands (CPLs), which have improved MHC-binding and immunogenicity. It remains unknown how peptide-modification affects the resulting immune response. We studied the effect of CPLs derived from the influenza M158–66 epitope (GILGFVFTL) on the T-cell response. In HLA-A2*0201 transgenic mice, CPL-vaccination led to higher T-cell frequencies, but only a small percentage of the induced T cells recognized the GILG-wildtype (WT) peptide. CPL-vaccination resulted in a lower richness of the GILG-WT-specific T-cell repertoire and no improved protection against IAV-infection compared to GILG-WT peptide-vaccination. One CPL even appeared to enhance pathology after IAV-challenge. CPL-vaccination thus induces T cells not targeting the original peptide, which may lead to potential unwanted side effects.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:20:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dcf333a662a7405bb9eb73687aa9e066
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-0105
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:20:44Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series npj Vaccines
spelling doaj.art-dcf333a662a7405bb9eb73687aa9e0662023-11-19T12:17:53ZengNature Portfolionpj Vaccines2059-01052023-08-018111410.1038/s41541-023-00705-yModified influenza M158–66 peptide vaccination induces non-relevant T-cells and may enhance pathology after challengeJosien Lanfermeijer0Koen van de Ven1Harry van Dijken2Marion Hendriks3Cami M. P. Talavera Ormeño4Femke de Heij5Paul Roholl6José A. M. Borghans7Debbie van Baarle8Jørgen de Jonge9Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the EnvironmentCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the EnvironmentCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the EnvironmentCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the EnvironmentDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical CentreCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the EnvironmentMicroscope ConsultancyCenter for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center UtrechtCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the EnvironmentCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the EnvironmentAbstract CD8 + T cells are promising targets for vaccination against influenza A virus (IAV) infection. Their induction via peptide vaccination is not trivial, because peptides are weakly immunogenic. One strategy to overcome this is by vaccination with chemically enhanced altered peptide ligands (CPLs), which have improved MHC-binding and immunogenicity. It remains unknown how peptide-modification affects the resulting immune response. We studied the effect of CPLs derived from the influenza M158–66 epitope (GILGFVFTL) on the T-cell response. In HLA-A2*0201 transgenic mice, CPL-vaccination led to higher T-cell frequencies, but only a small percentage of the induced T cells recognized the GILG-wildtype (WT) peptide. CPL-vaccination resulted in a lower richness of the GILG-WT-specific T-cell repertoire and no improved protection against IAV-infection compared to GILG-WT peptide-vaccination. One CPL even appeared to enhance pathology after IAV-challenge. CPL-vaccination thus induces T cells not targeting the original peptide, which may lead to potential unwanted side effects.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-023-00705-y
spellingShingle Josien Lanfermeijer
Koen van de Ven
Harry van Dijken
Marion Hendriks
Cami M. P. Talavera Ormeño
Femke de Heij
Paul Roholl
José A. M. Borghans
Debbie van Baarle
Jørgen de Jonge
Modified influenza M158–66 peptide vaccination induces non-relevant T-cells and may enhance pathology after challenge
npj Vaccines
title Modified influenza M158–66 peptide vaccination induces non-relevant T-cells and may enhance pathology after challenge
title_full Modified influenza M158–66 peptide vaccination induces non-relevant T-cells and may enhance pathology after challenge
title_fullStr Modified influenza M158–66 peptide vaccination induces non-relevant T-cells and may enhance pathology after challenge
title_full_unstemmed Modified influenza M158–66 peptide vaccination induces non-relevant T-cells and may enhance pathology after challenge
title_short Modified influenza M158–66 peptide vaccination induces non-relevant T-cells and may enhance pathology after challenge
title_sort modified influenza m158 66 peptide vaccination induces non relevant t cells and may enhance pathology after challenge
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-023-00705-y
work_keys_str_mv AT josienlanfermeijer modifiedinfluenzam15866peptidevaccinationinducesnonrelevanttcellsandmayenhancepathologyafterchallenge
AT koenvandeven modifiedinfluenzam15866peptidevaccinationinducesnonrelevanttcellsandmayenhancepathologyafterchallenge
AT harryvandijken modifiedinfluenzam15866peptidevaccinationinducesnonrelevanttcellsandmayenhancepathologyafterchallenge
AT marionhendriks modifiedinfluenzam15866peptidevaccinationinducesnonrelevanttcellsandmayenhancepathologyafterchallenge
AT camimptalaveraormeno modifiedinfluenzam15866peptidevaccinationinducesnonrelevanttcellsandmayenhancepathologyafterchallenge
AT femkedeheij modifiedinfluenzam15866peptidevaccinationinducesnonrelevanttcellsandmayenhancepathologyafterchallenge
AT paulroholl modifiedinfluenzam15866peptidevaccinationinducesnonrelevanttcellsandmayenhancepathologyafterchallenge
AT joseamborghans modifiedinfluenzam15866peptidevaccinationinducesnonrelevanttcellsandmayenhancepathologyafterchallenge
AT debbievanbaarle modifiedinfluenzam15866peptidevaccinationinducesnonrelevanttcellsandmayenhancepathologyafterchallenge
AT jørgendejonge modifiedinfluenzam15866peptidevaccinationinducesnonrelevanttcellsandmayenhancepathologyafterchallenge