Numerical analyses on performance of low carbon containership
Onboard Carbon Capture and Storage (OCCS) was found to be a potential approach for maritime decarbonization. By using the optimized OCCS, 90% carbon capture rate was achieved with a lower regeneration duty of 3,637 MJ/ton CO2. It was also found that with integration of waste heat recovery (WHR), the...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Energy Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484723001798 |
| _version_ | 1827902728747089920 |
|---|---|
| author | Li Chin Law Mohd Roslee Othman Epaminondas Mastorakos |
| author_facet | Li Chin Law Mohd Roslee Othman Epaminondas Mastorakos |
| author_sort | Li Chin Law |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Onboard Carbon Capture and Storage (OCCS) was found to be a potential approach for maritime decarbonization. By using the optimized OCCS, 90% carbon capture rate was achieved with a lower regeneration duty of 3,637 MJ/ton CO2. It was also found that with integration of waste heat recovery (WHR), the regeneration duty of CCS can be further reduced by 58.5% to 1,510 MJ/ton CO2. Detailed numerical analyses on CCS-Ship showed that the OCCS installation onboard of the reference ship used less than 15% of the total ship length. In contrast, the E-Ship would occupy 80% of deck area for battery installation. In addition, the CSS-Ship was found to retain 97.73% of cargo, consume 66.94 kJ/ton.nm of ES, incur $0.00093/ton.nm of CS, and improve the attained EEDI to 0.49 gCO 2/ton.nm, which improved the ship EEDI by 88% as compared to the ship built in year 2000-2010. Numerical analyses between various alternative fuelled-ships showed that the ship with CCS installation (CCS-Ship) was at least 1 time and 12 times more economical than hydrogen fuelled-ship (H2-Ship) and electrically propelled-ship (E-Ship) respectively. The data obtained from this research suggest that OCCS is a promising decarbonization alternative for shipping industry with relatively low cost, less than 3% capacity loss and that it achieved 88% of EEDI improvement. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T00:03:27Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-dcf6945abb684582ba63cb8fcd4d4672 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2352-4847 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T00:03:27Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Energy Reports |
| spelling | doaj.art-dcf6945abb684582ba63cb8fcd4d46722023-07-13T05:29:33ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472023-12-01934403457Numerical analyses on performance of low carbon containershipLi Chin Law0Mohd Roslee Othman1Epaminondas Mastorakos2Cambridge Centre for Advanced Research and Education in Singapore (CARES), CREATE Tower, 1 Create Way, 1386021, Singapore; School of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia; Corresponding author at: Cambridge Centre for Advanced Research and Education in Singapore (CARES), CREATE Tower, 1 Create Way, 1386021, Singapore.School of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia; Corresponding author.Cambridge Centre for Advanced Research and Education in Singapore (CARES), CREATE Tower, 1 Create Way, 1386021, Singapore; Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UKOnboard Carbon Capture and Storage (OCCS) was found to be a potential approach for maritime decarbonization. By using the optimized OCCS, 90% carbon capture rate was achieved with a lower regeneration duty of 3,637 MJ/ton CO2. It was also found that with integration of waste heat recovery (WHR), the regeneration duty of CCS can be further reduced by 58.5% to 1,510 MJ/ton CO2. Detailed numerical analyses on CCS-Ship showed that the OCCS installation onboard of the reference ship used less than 15% of the total ship length. In contrast, the E-Ship would occupy 80% of deck area for battery installation. In addition, the CSS-Ship was found to retain 97.73% of cargo, consume 66.94 kJ/ton.nm of ES, incur $0.00093/ton.nm of CS, and improve the attained EEDI to 0.49 gCO 2/ton.nm, which improved the ship EEDI by 88% as compared to the ship built in year 2000-2010. Numerical analyses between various alternative fuelled-ships showed that the ship with CCS installation (CCS-Ship) was at least 1 time and 12 times more economical than hydrogen fuelled-ship (H2-Ship) and electrically propelled-ship (E-Ship) respectively. The data obtained from this research suggest that OCCS is a promising decarbonization alternative for shipping industry with relatively low cost, less than 3% capacity loss and that it achieved 88% of EEDI improvement.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484723001798Onboard carbon captureContainershipMaritime decarbonizationAlternative fuelsAcid gas capture unitASPEN hysys |
| spellingShingle | Li Chin Law Mohd Roslee Othman Epaminondas Mastorakos Numerical analyses on performance of low carbon containership Energy Reports Onboard carbon capture Containership Maritime decarbonization Alternative fuels Acid gas capture unit ASPEN hysys |
| title | Numerical analyses on performance of low carbon containership |
| title_full | Numerical analyses on performance of low carbon containership |
| title_fullStr | Numerical analyses on performance of low carbon containership |
| title_full_unstemmed | Numerical analyses on performance of low carbon containership |
| title_short | Numerical analyses on performance of low carbon containership |
| title_sort | numerical analyses on performance of low carbon containership |
| topic | Onboard carbon capture Containership Maritime decarbonization Alternative fuels Acid gas capture unit ASPEN hysys |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484723001798 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lichinlaw numericalanalysesonperformanceoflowcarboncontainership AT mohdrosleeothman numericalanalysesonperformanceoflowcarboncontainership AT epaminondasmastorakos numericalanalysesonperformanceoflowcarboncontainership |