Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people

Abstract Background The concept of Functional Independence (FI), defined as ‘functioning physically safe and independent from other persons, within one’s context”, plays an important role in maintaining the functional ability to enable well-being in older age. FI is a dynamic and complex concept cov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esther A.L.M. Molenaar, Di-Janne JA Barten, Anne M.S. de Hoop, Nienke Bleijenberg, Niek J de Wit, Cindy Veenhof
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-12-01
Series:BMC Geriatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03684-2
_version_ 1797977299959676928
author Esther A.L.M. Molenaar
Di-Janne JA Barten
Anne M.S. de Hoop
Nienke Bleijenberg
Niek J de Wit
Cindy Veenhof
author_facet Esther A.L.M. Molenaar
Di-Janne JA Barten
Anne M.S. de Hoop
Nienke Bleijenberg
Niek J de Wit
Cindy Veenhof
author_sort Esther A.L.M. Molenaar
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The concept of Functional Independence (FI), defined as ‘functioning physically safe and independent from other persons, within one’s context”, plays an important role in maintaining the functional ability to enable well-being in older age. FI is a dynamic and complex concept covering four clinical outcomes: physical capacity, empowerment, coping flexibility, and health literacy. As the level of FI differs widely between older adults, healthcare professionals must gain insight into how to best support older people in maintaining their level of FI in a personalized manner. Insight into subgroups of FI could be a first step in providing personalized support This study aims to identify clinically relevant, distinct subgroups of FI in Dutch community-dwelling older people and subsequently describe them according to individual characteristics. Results One hundred fifty-three community-dwelling older persons were included for participation. Cluster analysis identified four distinctive clusters: (1) Performers – Well-informed; this subgroup is physically strong, well-informed and educated, independent, non-falling, with limited reflective coping style. (2) Performers – Achievers: physically strong people with a limited coping style and health literacy level. (3) The reliant- Good Coper representing physically somewhat limited people with sufficient coping styles who receive professional help. (4) The reliant – Receivers: physically limited people with insufficient coping styles who receive professional help. These subgroups showed significant differences in demographic characteristics and clinical FI outcomes. Conclusions Community-dwelling older persons can be allocated to four distinct and clinically relevant subgroups based on their level of FI. This subgrouping provides insight into the complex holistic concept of FI by pointing out for each subgroup which FI domain is affected. This way, it helps to better target interventions to prevent the decline of FI in the community-dwelling older population.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:04:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd028024df6b47a08cc397acafb67444
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2318
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:04:41Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Geriatrics
spelling doaj.art-dd028024df6b47a08cc397acafb674442022-12-25T12:28:34ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182022-12-0122111110.1186/s12877-022-03684-2Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older peopleEsther A.L.M. Molenaar0Di-Janne JA Barten1Anne M.S. de Hoop2Nienke Bleijenberg3Niek J de Wit4Cindy Veenhof5Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, Utrecht University of Applied SciencesResearch Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, Utrecht University of Applied SciencesResearch Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, Utrecht University of Applied SciencesDepartment of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityDepartment of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityResearch Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, Utrecht University of Applied SciencesAbstract Background The concept of Functional Independence (FI), defined as ‘functioning physically safe and independent from other persons, within one’s context”, plays an important role in maintaining the functional ability to enable well-being in older age. FI is a dynamic and complex concept covering four clinical outcomes: physical capacity, empowerment, coping flexibility, and health literacy. As the level of FI differs widely between older adults, healthcare professionals must gain insight into how to best support older people in maintaining their level of FI in a personalized manner. Insight into subgroups of FI could be a first step in providing personalized support This study aims to identify clinically relevant, distinct subgroups of FI in Dutch community-dwelling older people and subsequently describe them according to individual characteristics. Results One hundred fifty-three community-dwelling older persons were included for participation. Cluster analysis identified four distinctive clusters: (1) Performers – Well-informed; this subgroup is physically strong, well-informed and educated, independent, non-falling, with limited reflective coping style. (2) Performers – Achievers: physically strong people with a limited coping style and health literacy level. (3) The reliant- Good Coper representing physically somewhat limited people with sufficient coping styles who receive professional help. (4) The reliant – Receivers: physically limited people with insufficient coping styles who receive professional help. These subgroups showed significant differences in demographic characteristics and clinical FI outcomes. Conclusions Community-dwelling older persons can be allocated to four distinct and clinically relevant subgroups based on their level of FI. This subgrouping provides insight into the complex holistic concept of FI by pointing out for each subgroup which FI domain is affected. This way, it helps to better target interventions to prevent the decline of FI in the community-dwelling older population.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03684-2Functional independenceOlder personsSubgrouping
spellingShingle Esther A.L.M. Molenaar
Di-Janne JA Barten
Anne M.S. de Hoop
Nienke Bleijenberg
Niek J de Wit
Cindy Veenhof
Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people
BMC Geriatrics
Functional independence
Older persons
Subgrouping
title Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people
title_full Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people
title_fullStr Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people
title_full_unstemmed Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people
title_short Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people
title_sort cluster analysis of functional independence in community dwelling older people
topic Functional independence
Older persons
Subgrouping
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03684-2
work_keys_str_mv AT estheralmmolenaar clusteranalysisoffunctionalindependenceincommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT dijannejabarten clusteranalysisoffunctionalindependenceincommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT annemsdehoop clusteranalysisoffunctionalindependenceincommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT nienkebleijenberg clusteranalysisoffunctionalindependenceincommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT niekjdewit clusteranalysisoffunctionalindependenceincommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT cindyveenhof clusteranalysisoffunctionalindependenceincommunitydwellingolderpeople