Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people
Abstract Background The concept of Functional Independence (FI), defined as ‘functioning physically safe and independent from other persons, within one’s context”, plays an important role in maintaining the functional ability to enable well-being in older age. FI is a dynamic and complex concept cov...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Geriatrics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03684-2 |
_version_ | 1797977299959676928 |
---|---|
author | Esther A.L.M. Molenaar Di-Janne JA Barten Anne M.S. de Hoop Nienke Bleijenberg Niek J de Wit Cindy Veenhof |
author_facet | Esther A.L.M. Molenaar Di-Janne JA Barten Anne M.S. de Hoop Nienke Bleijenberg Niek J de Wit Cindy Veenhof |
author_sort | Esther A.L.M. Molenaar |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The concept of Functional Independence (FI), defined as ‘functioning physically safe and independent from other persons, within one’s context”, plays an important role in maintaining the functional ability to enable well-being in older age. FI is a dynamic and complex concept covering four clinical outcomes: physical capacity, empowerment, coping flexibility, and health literacy. As the level of FI differs widely between older adults, healthcare professionals must gain insight into how to best support older people in maintaining their level of FI in a personalized manner. Insight into subgroups of FI could be a first step in providing personalized support This study aims to identify clinically relevant, distinct subgroups of FI in Dutch community-dwelling older people and subsequently describe them according to individual characteristics. Results One hundred fifty-three community-dwelling older persons were included for participation. Cluster analysis identified four distinctive clusters: (1) Performers – Well-informed; this subgroup is physically strong, well-informed and educated, independent, non-falling, with limited reflective coping style. (2) Performers – Achievers: physically strong people with a limited coping style and health literacy level. (3) The reliant- Good Coper representing physically somewhat limited people with sufficient coping styles who receive professional help. (4) The reliant – Receivers: physically limited people with insufficient coping styles who receive professional help. These subgroups showed significant differences in demographic characteristics and clinical FI outcomes. Conclusions Community-dwelling older persons can be allocated to four distinct and clinically relevant subgroups based on their level of FI. This subgrouping provides insight into the complex holistic concept of FI by pointing out for each subgroup which FI domain is affected. This way, it helps to better target interventions to prevent the decline of FI in the community-dwelling older population. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T05:04:41Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-dd028024df6b47a08cc397acafb67444 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2318 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T05:04:41Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Geriatrics |
spelling | doaj.art-dd028024df6b47a08cc397acafb674442022-12-25T12:28:34ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182022-12-0122111110.1186/s12877-022-03684-2Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older peopleEsther A.L.M. Molenaar0Di-Janne JA Barten1Anne M.S. de Hoop2Nienke Bleijenberg3Niek J de Wit4Cindy Veenhof5Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, Utrecht University of Applied SciencesResearch Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, Utrecht University of Applied SciencesResearch Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, Utrecht University of Applied SciencesDepartment of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityDepartment of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityResearch Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, Utrecht University of Applied SciencesAbstract Background The concept of Functional Independence (FI), defined as ‘functioning physically safe and independent from other persons, within one’s context”, plays an important role in maintaining the functional ability to enable well-being in older age. FI is a dynamic and complex concept covering four clinical outcomes: physical capacity, empowerment, coping flexibility, and health literacy. As the level of FI differs widely between older adults, healthcare professionals must gain insight into how to best support older people in maintaining their level of FI in a personalized manner. Insight into subgroups of FI could be a first step in providing personalized support This study aims to identify clinically relevant, distinct subgroups of FI in Dutch community-dwelling older people and subsequently describe them according to individual characteristics. Results One hundred fifty-three community-dwelling older persons were included for participation. Cluster analysis identified four distinctive clusters: (1) Performers – Well-informed; this subgroup is physically strong, well-informed and educated, independent, non-falling, with limited reflective coping style. (2) Performers – Achievers: physically strong people with a limited coping style and health literacy level. (3) The reliant- Good Coper representing physically somewhat limited people with sufficient coping styles who receive professional help. (4) The reliant – Receivers: physically limited people with insufficient coping styles who receive professional help. These subgroups showed significant differences in demographic characteristics and clinical FI outcomes. Conclusions Community-dwelling older persons can be allocated to four distinct and clinically relevant subgroups based on their level of FI. This subgrouping provides insight into the complex holistic concept of FI by pointing out for each subgroup which FI domain is affected. This way, it helps to better target interventions to prevent the decline of FI in the community-dwelling older population.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03684-2Functional independenceOlder personsSubgrouping |
spellingShingle | Esther A.L.M. Molenaar Di-Janne JA Barten Anne M.S. de Hoop Nienke Bleijenberg Niek J de Wit Cindy Veenhof Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people BMC Geriatrics Functional independence Older persons Subgrouping |
title | Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people |
title_full | Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people |
title_fullStr | Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people |
title_full_unstemmed | Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people |
title_short | Cluster analysis of functional independence in community-dwelling older people |
title_sort | cluster analysis of functional independence in community dwelling older people |
topic | Functional independence Older persons Subgrouping |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03684-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT estheralmmolenaar clusteranalysisoffunctionalindependenceincommunitydwellingolderpeople AT dijannejabarten clusteranalysisoffunctionalindependenceincommunitydwellingolderpeople AT annemsdehoop clusteranalysisoffunctionalindependenceincommunitydwellingolderpeople AT nienkebleijenberg clusteranalysisoffunctionalindependenceincommunitydwellingolderpeople AT niekjdewit clusteranalysisoffunctionalindependenceincommunitydwellingolderpeople AT cindyveenhof clusteranalysisoffunctionalindependenceincommunitydwellingolderpeople |