Within- and between-therapist agreement on personalized parameters for robot-assisted gait therapy: the challenge of adjusting robotic assistance
Abstract Background Stationary robotic gait trainers usually allow for adjustment of training parameters, including gait speed, body weight support and robotic assistance, to personalize therapy. Consequently, therapists personalize parameter settings to pursue a relevant therapy goal for each patie...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01176-x |
| _version_ | 1797795810908307456 |
|---|---|
| author | Florian van Dellen T. Aurich-Schuler Rob Labruyère |
| author_facet | Florian van Dellen T. Aurich-Schuler Rob Labruyère |
| author_sort | Florian van Dellen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Stationary robotic gait trainers usually allow for adjustment of training parameters, including gait speed, body weight support and robotic assistance, to personalize therapy. Consequently, therapists personalize parameter settings to pursue a relevant therapy goal for each patient. Previous work has shown that the choice of parameters influences the behavior of patients. At the same time, randomized clinical trials usually do not report the applied settings and do not consider them in the interpretation of their results. The choice of adequate parameter settings therefore remains one of the major challenges that therapists face in everyday clinical practice. For therapy to be most effective, personalization should ideally result in repeatable parameter settings for repeatable therapy situations, irrespective of the therapist who adjusts the parameters. This has not yet been investigated. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the agreement of parameter settings from session to session within a therapist and between two different therapists in children and adolescents undergoing robot-assisted gait training. Methods and results Fourteen patients walked in the robotic gait trainer Lokomat on 2 days. Two therapists from a pool of 5 therapists independently personalized gait speed, bodyweight support and robotic assistance for a moderately and a vigorously intensive therapy task. There was a very high agreement within and between therapists for the parameters gait speed and bodyweight support, but a substantially lower agreement for robotic assistance. Conclusion These findings imply that therapists perform consistently at setting parameters that have a very clear and visible clinical effect (e.g. walking speed and bodyweight support). However, they have more difficulties with robotic assistance, which has a more ambiguous effect because patients may respond differently to changes. Future work should therefore focus on better understanding patient reactions to changes in robotic assistance and especially on how instructions can be employed to steer these reactions. To improve the agreement, we propose that therapists link their choice of robotic assistance to the individual therapy goals of the patients and closely guide the patients during walking with instructions. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T03:24:42Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-dd040094e5074ead9e37b9886121b314 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1743-0003 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T03:24:42Z |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation |
| spelling | doaj.art-dd040094e5074ead9e37b9886121b3142023-06-25T11:10:35ZengBMCJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation1743-00032023-06-012011910.1186/s12984-023-01176-xWithin- and between-therapist agreement on personalized parameters for robot-assisted gait therapy: the challenge of adjusting robotic assistanceFlorian van Dellen0T. Aurich-Schuler1Rob Labruyère2Sensory-Motor Systems Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH ZurichSwiss Children’s Rehab, University Children’s Hospital ZurichSwiss Children’s Rehab, University Children’s Hospital ZurichAbstract Background Stationary robotic gait trainers usually allow for adjustment of training parameters, including gait speed, body weight support and robotic assistance, to personalize therapy. Consequently, therapists personalize parameter settings to pursue a relevant therapy goal for each patient. Previous work has shown that the choice of parameters influences the behavior of patients. At the same time, randomized clinical trials usually do not report the applied settings and do not consider them in the interpretation of their results. The choice of adequate parameter settings therefore remains one of the major challenges that therapists face in everyday clinical practice. For therapy to be most effective, personalization should ideally result in repeatable parameter settings for repeatable therapy situations, irrespective of the therapist who adjusts the parameters. This has not yet been investigated. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the agreement of parameter settings from session to session within a therapist and between two different therapists in children and adolescents undergoing robot-assisted gait training. Methods and results Fourteen patients walked in the robotic gait trainer Lokomat on 2 days. Two therapists from a pool of 5 therapists independently personalized gait speed, bodyweight support and robotic assistance for a moderately and a vigorously intensive therapy task. There was a very high agreement within and between therapists for the parameters gait speed and bodyweight support, but a substantially lower agreement for robotic assistance. Conclusion These findings imply that therapists perform consistently at setting parameters that have a very clear and visible clinical effect (e.g. walking speed and bodyweight support). However, they have more difficulties with robotic assistance, which has a more ambiguous effect because patients may respond differently to changes. Future work should therefore focus on better understanding patient reactions to changes in robotic assistance and especially on how instructions can be employed to steer these reactions. To improve the agreement, we propose that therapists link their choice of robotic assistance to the individual therapy goals of the patients and closely guide the patients during walking with instructions.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01176-xBodyweight supportGait speedGuidance forcePath controlExoskeletonTherapist decision making |
| spellingShingle | Florian van Dellen T. Aurich-Schuler Rob Labruyère Within- and between-therapist agreement on personalized parameters for robot-assisted gait therapy: the challenge of adjusting robotic assistance Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation Bodyweight support Gait speed Guidance force Path control Exoskeleton Therapist decision making |
| title | Within- and between-therapist agreement on personalized parameters for robot-assisted gait therapy: the challenge of adjusting robotic assistance |
| title_full | Within- and between-therapist agreement on personalized parameters for robot-assisted gait therapy: the challenge of adjusting robotic assistance |
| title_fullStr | Within- and between-therapist agreement on personalized parameters for robot-assisted gait therapy: the challenge of adjusting robotic assistance |
| title_full_unstemmed | Within- and between-therapist agreement on personalized parameters for robot-assisted gait therapy: the challenge of adjusting robotic assistance |
| title_short | Within- and between-therapist agreement on personalized parameters for robot-assisted gait therapy: the challenge of adjusting robotic assistance |
| title_sort | within and between therapist agreement on personalized parameters for robot assisted gait therapy the challenge of adjusting robotic assistance |
| topic | Bodyweight support Gait speed Guidance force Path control Exoskeleton Therapist decision making |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01176-x |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT florianvandellen withinandbetweentherapistagreementonpersonalizedparametersforrobotassistedgaittherapythechallengeofadjustingroboticassistance AT taurichschuler withinandbetweentherapistagreementonpersonalizedparametersforrobotassistedgaittherapythechallengeofadjustingroboticassistance AT roblabruyere withinandbetweentherapistagreementonpersonalizedparametersforrobotassistedgaittherapythechallengeofadjustingroboticassistance |