Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BackgroundThe importance of regular physical activity for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-established. However, many patients do not meet the recommended daily amount. Accelerometers might provide patients with the information needed to increase physical activity i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vooijs, Martijn, Alpay, Laurence L, Snoeck-Stroband, Jiska B, Beerthuizen, Thijs, Siemonsma, Petra C, Abbink, Jannie J, Sont, Jacob K, Rövekamp, Ton A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2014-10-01
Series:Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Online Access:http://www.i-jmr.org/2014/4/e14/
_version_ 1818385653149204480
author Vooijs, Martijn
Alpay, Laurence L
Snoeck-Stroband, Jiska B
Beerthuizen, Thijs
Siemonsma, Petra C
Abbink, Jannie J
Sont, Jacob K
Rövekamp, Ton A
author_facet Vooijs, Martijn
Alpay, Laurence L
Snoeck-Stroband, Jiska B
Beerthuizen, Thijs
Siemonsma, Petra C
Abbink, Jannie J
Sont, Jacob K
Rövekamp, Ton A
author_sort Vooijs, Martijn
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe importance of regular physical activity for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-established. However, many patients do not meet the recommended daily amount. Accelerometers might provide patients with the information needed to increase physical activity in daily life. ObjectiveOur objective was to assess the validity and usability of low-cost Internet-connected accelerometers. Furthermore we explored patients’ preferences with regards to the presentation of and feedback on monitored physical activity. MethodsTo assess concurrent validity we conducted a field validation study with patients who wore two low-cost accelerometers, Fitbit and Physical Activity Monitor (PAM), at the same time along with a sophisticated multisensor accelerometer (SenseWear Armband) for 48 hours. Data on energy expenditure assessed from registrations from the two low-cost accelerometers were compared to the well validated SenseWear Armband which served as a reference criterion. Usability was examined in a cross-over study with patients who, in succession, wore the Fitbit and the PAM for 7 consecutive days and filled out a 16 item questionnaire with regards to the use of the corresponding device ResultsThe agreement between energy expenditure (METs) from the SenseWear Armband with METs estimated by the Fitbit and PAM was good (r=.77) and moderate (r=.41), respectively. The regression model that was developed for the Fitbit explained 92% whereas the PAM-model could explain 89% of total variance in METs measured by the SenseWear. With regards to the usability, both the Fitbit and PAM were well rated on all items. There were no significant differences between the two devices. ConclusionsThe low-cost Fitbit and PAM are valid and usable devices to measure physical activity in patients with COPD. These devices may be useful in long-term interventions aiming at increasing physical activity levels in these patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T03:41:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd04e7071a5a46e5be82aa330ae457f5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1929-073X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T03:41:34Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series Interactive Journal of Medical Research
spelling doaj.art-dd04e7071a5a46e5be82aa330ae457f52022-12-21T23:18:29ZengJMIR PublicationsInteractive Journal of Medical Research1929-073X2014-10-0134e1410.2196/ijmr.3056Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseVooijs, MartijnAlpay, Laurence LSnoeck-Stroband, Jiska BBeerthuizen, ThijsSiemonsma, Petra CAbbink, Jannie JSont, Jacob KRövekamp, Ton ABackgroundThe importance of regular physical activity for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-established. However, many patients do not meet the recommended daily amount. Accelerometers might provide patients with the information needed to increase physical activity in daily life. ObjectiveOur objective was to assess the validity and usability of low-cost Internet-connected accelerometers. Furthermore we explored patients’ preferences with regards to the presentation of and feedback on monitored physical activity. MethodsTo assess concurrent validity we conducted a field validation study with patients who wore two low-cost accelerometers, Fitbit and Physical Activity Monitor (PAM), at the same time along with a sophisticated multisensor accelerometer (SenseWear Armband) for 48 hours. Data on energy expenditure assessed from registrations from the two low-cost accelerometers were compared to the well validated SenseWear Armband which served as a reference criterion. Usability was examined in a cross-over study with patients who, in succession, wore the Fitbit and the PAM for 7 consecutive days and filled out a 16 item questionnaire with regards to the use of the corresponding device ResultsThe agreement between energy expenditure (METs) from the SenseWear Armband with METs estimated by the Fitbit and PAM was good (r=.77) and moderate (r=.41), respectively. The regression model that was developed for the Fitbit explained 92% whereas the PAM-model could explain 89% of total variance in METs measured by the SenseWear. With regards to the usability, both the Fitbit and PAM were well rated on all items. There were no significant differences between the two devices. ConclusionsThe low-cost Fitbit and PAM are valid and usable devices to measure physical activity in patients with COPD. These devices may be useful in long-term interventions aiming at increasing physical activity levels in these patients.http://www.i-jmr.org/2014/4/e14/
spellingShingle Vooijs, Martijn
Alpay, Laurence L
Snoeck-Stroband, Jiska B
Beerthuizen, Thijs
Siemonsma, Petra C
Abbink, Jannie J
Sont, Jacob K
Rövekamp, Ton A
Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
title Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_full Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_fullStr Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_short Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_sort validity and usability of low cost accelerometers for internet based self monitoring of physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
url http://www.i-jmr.org/2014/4/e14/
work_keys_str_mv AT vooijsmartijn validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT alpaylaurencel validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT snoeckstrobandjiskab validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT beerthuizenthijs validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT siemonsmapetrac validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT abbinkjanniej validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT sontjacobk validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT rovekamptona validityandusabilityoflowcostaccelerometersforinternetbasedselfmonitoringofphysicalactivityinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease