Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate enantiomers: quantitation and sensory evaluation in wine

Aim: To investigate chemical and sensory characteristics of ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate in wines. Methods and results: Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate has been recently identified as a potential marker of lactic acid bacteria esterase activity. Enantiomers of this fruity ester were quantitat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marine Gammacurta, Sophie Tempere, Stéphanie Marchand, Virginie Moine, Gilles de Revel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Viticulture and Enology Society 2018-03-01
Series:OENO One
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/1902
_version_ 1818615074188689408
author Marine Gammacurta
Sophie Tempere
Stéphanie Marchand
Virginie Moine
Gilles de Revel
author_facet Marine Gammacurta
Sophie Tempere
Stéphanie Marchand
Virginie Moine
Gilles de Revel
author_sort Marine Gammacurta
collection DOAJ
description Aim: To investigate chemical and sensory characteristics of ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate in wines. Methods and results: Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate has been recently identified as a potential marker of lactic acid bacteria esterase activity. Enantiomers of this fruity ester were quantitated in 99 wines from various vintages and French regions using chiral gas chromatography (γ-cyclodextrin phase). Analyses revealed the predominant presence of the R enantiomer in red and white wines, with a maximum R/S enantiomeric ratio of 94/6 in a 1993 red wine. Results also highlighted greater levels of the ester in red than white wines, depending on grape origin. The detection thresholds of the R- and S-form were estimated at 4 µg/L and 1.5 µg/L in water and 51 mg/L and 21 mg/L in red wine, respectively. Moreover, ranking tests made with levels found in wines did not show significant sensory differences. Conclusion: The concentrations found in wines were considerably below the detection threshold, indicating no direct effect of these compounds on fruity aroma modulation. The absence of significant difference in sensory tests demonstrates that ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate does not contribute significantly to the fruity aroma of red wine. Significance and impact of the study: To our knowledge, no previous research had determined the enantiomeric distribution and the sensory characteristics of this compound in wine.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T16:28:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd0b23fc2eba442ca9c47dfc6769dd62
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2494-1271
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T16:28:07Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher International Viticulture and Enology Society
record_format Article
series OENO One
spelling doaj.art-dd0b23fc2eba442ca9c47dfc6769dd622022-12-21T22:24:40ZengInternational Viticulture and Enology SocietyOENO One2494-12712018-03-01521576510.20870/oeno-one.2018.52.1.19021902Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate enantiomers: quantitation and sensory evaluation in wineMarine GammacurtaSophie TempereStéphanie MarchandVirginie MoineGilles de RevelAim: To investigate chemical and sensory characteristics of ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate in wines. Methods and results: Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate has been recently identified as a potential marker of lactic acid bacteria esterase activity. Enantiomers of this fruity ester were quantitated in 99 wines from various vintages and French regions using chiral gas chromatography (γ-cyclodextrin phase). Analyses revealed the predominant presence of the R enantiomer in red and white wines, with a maximum R/S enantiomeric ratio of 94/6 in a 1993 red wine. Results also highlighted greater levels of the ester in red than white wines, depending on grape origin. The detection thresholds of the R- and S-form were estimated at 4 µg/L and 1.5 µg/L in water and 51 mg/L and 21 mg/L in red wine, respectively. Moreover, ranking tests made with levels found in wines did not show significant sensory differences. Conclusion: The concentrations found in wines were considerably below the detection threshold, indicating no direct effect of these compounds on fruity aroma modulation. The absence of significant difference in sensory tests demonstrates that ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate does not contribute significantly to the fruity aroma of red wine. Significance and impact of the study: To our knowledge, no previous research had determined the enantiomeric distribution and the sensory characteristics of this compound in wine.https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/1902Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoateenantiomerschiral GCred winefruity aroma
spellingShingle Marine Gammacurta
Sophie Tempere
Stéphanie Marchand
Virginie Moine
Gilles de Revel
Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate enantiomers: quantitation and sensory evaluation in wine
OENO One
Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate
enantiomers
chiral GC
red wine
fruity aroma
title Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate enantiomers: quantitation and sensory evaluation in wine
title_full Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate enantiomers: quantitation and sensory evaluation in wine
title_fullStr Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate enantiomers: quantitation and sensory evaluation in wine
title_full_unstemmed Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate enantiomers: quantitation and sensory evaluation in wine
title_short Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate enantiomers: quantitation and sensory evaluation in wine
title_sort ethyl 2 hydroxy 3 methylbutanoate enantiomers quantitation and sensory evaluation in wine
topic Ethyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutanoate
enantiomers
chiral GC
red wine
fruity aroma
url https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/1902
work_keys_str_mv AT marinegammacurta ethyl2hydroxy3methylbutanoateenantiomersquantitationandsensoryevaluationinwine
AT sophietempere ethyl2hydroxy3methylbutanoateenantiomersquantitationandsensoryevaluationinwine
AT stephaniemarchand ethyl2hydroxy3methylbutanoateenantiomersquantitationandsensoryevaluationinwine
AT virginiemoine ethyl2hydroxy3methylbutanoateenantiomersquantitationandsensoryevaluationinwine
AT gillesderevel ethyl2hydroxy3methylbutanoateenantiomersquantitationandsensoryevaluationinwine