Simultaneity of consciousness with physical reality: the key that unlocks the mind-matter problem

The problem of explaining the relationship between subjective experience and physical reality remains difficult and unresolved. In most explanations, consciousness is epiphenomenal, without causal power. The most notable exception is Integrated Information Theory (IIT), which provides a causal expla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Sanfey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173653/full
_version_ 1797671562755702784
author John Sanfey
author_facet John Sanfey
author_sort John Sanfey
collection DOAJ
description The problem of explaining the relationship between subjective experience and physical reality remains difficult and unresolved. In most explanations, consciousness is epiphenomenal, without causal power. The most notable exception is Integrated Information Theory (IIT), which provides a causal explanation for consciousness. However, IIT relies on an identity between subjectivity and a particular type of physical structure, namely with an information structure that has intrinsic causal power greater than the sum of its parts. Any theory that relies on a psycho-phyiscal identity must eventually appeal to panpsychism, which undermines that theory’s claim to be fundamental. IIT has recently pivoted towards a strong version of causal emergence, but macroscopic structures cannot be stronger causally than their microphysical parts without some new physical law or governing principle. The approach taken here is designed to uncover such a principle. The decisive argument is entirely deductive from initial premises that are phenomenologically certain. If correct, the arguments prove that conscious experience is sufficient to create additional degrees of causal freedom independently of the content of experience, and in a manner that is unpredictable and unobservable by any temporally sequential means. This provides a fundamental principle about consciousness, and a conceptual bridge between it and the physics describing what is experienced. The principle makes testable predictions about brain function, with notable differences from IIT, some of which are also empirically testable.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:17:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd0cd2b48b834630bcd61daead9e7249
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T21:17:21Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-dd0cd2b48b834630bcd61daead9e72492023-09-28T17:16:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-09-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.11736531173653Simultaneity of consciousness with physical reality: the key that unlocks the mind-matter problemJohn SanfeyThe problem of explaining the relationship between subjective experience and physical reality remains difficult and unresolved. In most explanations, consciousness is epiphenomenal, without causal power. The most notable exception is Integrated Information Theory (IIT), which provides a causal explanation for consciousness. However, IIT relies on an identity between subjectivity and a particular type of physical structure, namely with an information structure that has intrinsic causal power greater than the sum of its parts. Any theory that relies on a psycho-phyiscal identity must eventually appeal to panpsychism, which undermines that theory’s claim to be fundamental. IIT has recently pivoted towards a strong version of causal emergence, but macroscopic structures cannot be stronger causally than their microphysical parts without some new physical law or governing principle. The approach taken here is designed to uncover such a principle. The decisive argument is entirely deductive from initial premises that are phenomenologically certain. If correct, the arguments prove that conscious experience is sufficient to create additional degrees of causal freedom independently of the content of experience, and in a manner that is unpredictable and unobservable by any temporally sequential means. This provides a fundamental principle about consciousness, and a conceptual bridge between it and the physics describing what is experienced. The principle makes testable predictions about brain function, with notable differences from IIT, some of which are also empirically testable.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173653/fullcausal emergencethe hard problem of consciousnesselectromagnetic field theory of consciousnesspsycho-physical bridging principlemind-matter relationshipobserver
spellingShingle John Sanfey
Simultaneity of consciousness with physical reality: the key that unlocks the mind-matter problem
Frontiers in Psychology
causal emergence
the hard problem of consciousness
electromagnetic field theory of consciousness
psycho-physical bridging principle
mind-matter relationship
observer
title Simultaneity of consciousness with physical reality: the key that unlocks the mind-matter problem
title_full Simultaneity of consciousness with physical reality: the key that unlocks the mind-matter problem
title_fullStr Simultaneity of consciousness with physical reality: the key that unlocks the mind-matter problem
title_full_unstemmed Simultaneity of consciousness with physical reality: the key that unlocks the mind-matter problem
title_short Simultaneity of consciousness with physical reality: the key that unlocks the mind-matter problem
title_sort simultaneity of consciousness with physical reality the key that unlocks the mind matter problem
topic causal emergence
the hard problem of consciousness
electromagnetic field theory of consciousness
psycho-physical bridging principle
mind-matter relationship
observer
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173653/full
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsanfey simultaneityofconsciousnesswithphysicalrealitythekeythatunlocksthemindmatterproblem