Neuro-computational mechanisms and individual biases in action-outcome learning under moral conflict

How we juggle morally conflicting outcomes during learning remains unknown. Here, by comparing variants of reinforcement learning models, the authors show that participants differ substantially in their preference, with some choosing actions that benefit themselves while others choose actions that p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Fornari, Kalliopi Ioumpa, Alessandra D. Nostro, Nathan J. Evans, Lorenzo De Angelis, Sebastian P. H. Speer, Riccardo Paracampo, Selene Gallo, Michael Spezio, Christian Keysers, Valeria Gazzola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-03-01
Series:Nature Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36807-3
_version_ 1797864249375064064
author Laura Fornari
Kalliopi Ioumpa
Alessandra D. Nostro
Nathan J. Evans
Lorenzo De Angelis
Sebastian P. H. Speer
Riccardo Paracampo
Selene Gallo
Michael Spezio
Christian Keysers
Valeria Gazzola
author_facet Laura Fornari
Kalliopi Ioumpa
Alessandra D. Nostro
Nathan J. Evans
Lorenzo De Angelis
Sebastian P. H. Speer
Riccardo Paracampo
Selene Gallo
Michael Spezio
Christian Keysers
Valeria Gazzola
author_sort Laura Fornari
collection DOAJ
description How we juggle morally conflicting outcomes during learning remains unknown. Here, by comparing variants of reinforcement learning models, the authors show that participants differ substantially in their preference, with some choosing actions that benefit themselves while others choose actions that prevent harm.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:48:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd0d9cf7f5264670a763c4bb2a8798c6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-1723
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:48:43Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Nature Communications
spelling doaj.art-dd0d9cf7f5264670a763c4bb2a8798c62023-03-22T11:43:42ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232023-03-0114111810.1038/s41467-023-36807-3Neuro-computational mechanisms and individual biases in action-outcome learning under moral conflictLaura Fornari0Kalliopi Ioumpa1Alessandra D. Nostro2Nathan J. Evans3Lorenzo De Angelis4Sebastian P. H. Speer5Riccardo Paracampo6Selene Gallo7Michael Spezio8Christian Keysers9Valeria Gazzola10Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAWNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAWNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAWSchool of Psychology, University of QueenslandNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAWNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAWNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAWNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAWPsychology, Neuroscience, & Data Science, Scripps CollegeNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAWNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, KNAWHow we juggle morally conflicting outcomes during learning remains unknown. Here, by comparing variants of reinforcement learning models, the authors show that participants differ substantially in their preference, with some choosing actions that benefit themselves while others choose actions that prevent harm.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36807-3
spellingShingle Laura Fornari
Kalliopi Ioumpa
Alessandra D. Nostro
Nathan J. Evans
Lorenzo De Angelis
Sebastian P. H. Speer
Riccardo Paracampo
Selene Gallo
Michael Spezio
Christian Keysers
Valeria Gazzola
Neuro-computational mechanisms and individual biases in action-outcome learning under moral conflict
Nature Communications
title Neuro-computational mechanisms and individual biases in action-outcome learning under moral conflict
title_full Neuro-computational mechanisms and individual biases in action-outcome learning under moral conflict
title_fullStr Neuro-computational mechanisms and individual biases in action-outcome learning under moral conflict
title_full_unstemmed Neuro-computational mechanisms and individual biases in action-outcome learning under moral conflict
title_short Neuro-computational mechanisms and individual biases in action-outcome learning under moral conflict
title_sort neuro computational mechanisms and individual biases in action outcome learning under moral conflict
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36807-3
work_keys_str_mv AT laurafornari neurocomputationalmechanismsandindividualbiasesinactionoutcomelearningundermoralconflict
AT kalliopiioumpa neurocomputationalmechanismsandindividualbiasesinactionoutcomelearningundermoralconflict
AT alessandradnostro neurocomputationalmechanismsandindividualbiasesinactionoutcomelearningundermoralconflict
AT nathanjevans neurocomputationalmechanismsandindividualbiasesinactionoutcomelearningundermoralconflict
AT lorenzodeangelis neurocomputationalmechanismsandindividualbiasesinactionoutcomelearningundermoralconflict
AT sebastianphspeer neurocomputationalmechanismsandindividualbiasesinactionoutcomelearningundermoralconflict
AT riccardoparacampo neurocomputationalmechanismsandindividualbiasesinactionoutcomelearningundermoralconflict
AT selenegallo neurocomputationalmechanismsandindividualbiasesinactionoutcomelearningundermoralconflict
AT michaelspezio neurocomputationalmechanismsandindividualbiasesinactionoutcomelearningundermoralconflict
AT christiankeysers neurocomputationalmechanismsandindividualbiasesinactionoutcomelearningundermoralconflict
AT valeriagazzola neurocomputationalmechanismsandindividualbiasesinactionoutcomelearningundermoralconflict