Reduced variability of bursting activity during working memory

Abstract Working memories have long been thought to be maintained by persistent spiking. However, mounting evidence from multiple-electrode recording (and single-trial analyses) shows that the underlying spiking is better characterized by intermittent bursts of activity. A counterargument suggested...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikael Lundqvist, Jonas Rose, Scott L. Brincat, Melissa R. Warden, Timothy J. Buschman, Pawel Herman, Earl K. Miller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-09-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18577-y
_version_ 1811273761330036736
author Mikael Lundqvist
Jonas Rose
Scott L. Brincat
Melissa R. Warden
Timothy J. Buschman
Pawel Herman
Earl K. Miller
author_facet Mikael Lundqvist
Jonas Rose
Scott L. Brincat
Melissa R. Warden
Timothy J. Buschman
Pawel Herman
Earl K. Miller
author_sort Mikael Lundqvist
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Working memories have long been thought to be maintained by persistent spiking. However, mounting evidence from multiple-electrode recording (and single-trial analyses) shows that the underlying spiking is better characterized by intermittent bursts of activity. A counterargument suggested this intermittent activity is at odds with observations that spike-time variability reduces during task performance. However, this counterargument rests on assumptions, such as randomness in the timing of the bursts, which may not be correct. Thus, we analyzed spiking and LFPs from monkeys’ prefrontal cortex (PFC) to determine if task-related reductions in variability can co-exist with intermittent spiking. We found that it does because both spiking and associated gamma bursts were task-modulated, not random. In fact, the task-related reduction in spike variability could largely be explained by a related reduction in gamma burst variability. Our results provide further support for the intermittent activity models of working memory as well as novel mechanistic insights into how spike variability is reduced during cognitive tasks.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:06:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd13372a5a2c402bb9270a04551ce2d6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:06:15Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-dd13372a5a2c402bb9270a04551ce2d62022-12-22T03:12:55ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-09-0112111010.1038/s41598-022-18577-yReduced variability of bursting activity during working memoryMikael Lundqvist0Jonas Rose1Scott L. Brincat2Melissa R. Warden3Timothy J. Buschman4Pawel Herman5Earl K. Miller6Department of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstituteThe Picower Institute for Learning and Memory and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyThe Picower Institute for Learning and Memory and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyThe Picower Institute for Learning and Memory and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyThe Picower Institute for Learning and Memory and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Computational Science and Technology, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and Digital Futures, KTH Royal Institute of TechnologyThe Picower Institute for Learning and Memory and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAbstract Working memories have long been thought to be maintained by persistent spiking. However, mounting evidence from multiple-electrode recording (and single-trial analyses) shows that the underlying spiking is better characterized by intermittent bursts of activity. A counterargument suggested this intermittent activity is at odds with observations that spike-time variability reduces during task performance. However, this counterargument rests on assumptions, such as randomness in the timing of the bursts, which may not be correct. Thus, we analyzed spiking and LFPs from monkeys’ prefrontal cortex (PFC) to determine if task-related reductions in variability can co-exist with intermittent spiking. We found that it does because both spiking and associated gamma bursts were task-modulated, not random. In fact, the task-related reduction in spike variability could largely be explained by a related reduction in gamma burst variability. Our results provide further support for the intermittent activity models of working memory as well as novel mechanistic insights into how spike variability is reduced during cognitive tasks.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18577-y
spellingShingle Mikael Lundqvist
Jonas Rose
Scott L. Brincat
Melissa R. Warden
Timothy J. Buschman
Pawel Herman
Earl K. Miller
Reduced variability of bursting activity during working memory
Scientific Reports
title Reduced variability of bursting activity during working memory
title_full Reduced variability of bursting activity during working memory
title_fullStr Reduced variability of bursting activity during working memory
title_full_unstemmed Reduced variability of bursting activity during working memory
title_short Reduced variability of bursting activity during working memory
title_sort reduced variability of bursting activity during working memory
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18577-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mikaellundqvist reducedvariabilityofburstingactivityduringworkingmemory
AT jonasrose reducedvariabilityofburstingactivityduringworkingmemory
AT scottlbrincat reducedvariabilityofburstingactivityduringworkingmemory
AT melissarwarden reducedvariabilityofburstingactivityduringworkingmemory
AT timothyjbuschman reducedvariabilityofburstingactivityduringworkingmemory
AT pawelherman reducedvariabilityofburstingactivityduringworkingmemory
AT earlkmiller reducedvariabilityofburstingactivityduringworkingmemory