Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Indication Biopsy—Results of a Prospective Single-Center Trial

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) identifies allograft injury and discriminates active rejection from no rejection. In this prospective study, 106 kidney transplant recipients with 108 clinically indicated biopsies were enrolled at Heidelberg University Hospital between November 2020 and Decemb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louise Benning, Christian Morath, Annette Fink, Markus Rudek, Claudius Speer, Florian Kälble, Christian Nusshag, Jörg Beimler, Constantin Schwab, Rüdiger Waldherr, Martin Zeier, Caner Süsal, Thuong Hien Tran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-01
Series:Transplant International
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2023.11899/full
_version_ 1811153564444131328
author Louise Benning
Christian Morath
Annette Fink
Markus Rudek
Claudius Speer
Florian Kälble
Christian Nusshag
Jörg Beimler
Constantin Schwab
Rüdiger Waldherr
Martin Zeier
Caner Süsal
Caner Süsal
Thuong Hien Tran
author_facet Louise Benning
Christian Morath
Annette Fink
Markus Rudek
Claudius Speer
Florian Kälble
Christian Nusshag
Jörg Beimler
Constantin Schwab
Rüdiger Waldherr
Martin Zeier
Caner Süsal
Caner Süsal
Thuong Hien Tran
author_sort Louise Benning
collection DOAJ
description Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) identifies allograft injury and discriminates active rejection from no rejection. In this prospective study, 106 kidney transplant recipients with 108 clinically indicated biopsies were enrolled at Heidelberg University Hospital between November 2020 and December 2022 to validate the clinical value of dd-cfDNA in a cohort of German patients. dd-cfDNA was quantified at biopsy and correlated to histopathology. Additionally, dd-cfDNA was determined on days 7, 30, and 90 post-biopsy and analyzed for potential use to monitor response to anti-rejection treatment. dd-cfDNA levels were with a median (IQR) % of 2.00 (0.48–3.20) highest in patients with ABMR, followed by 0.92 (0.19–11.25) in patients with TCMR, 0.44 (0.20–1.10) in patients with borderline changes and 0.20 (0.11–0.53) in patients with no signs of rejection. The AUC for dd-cfDNA to discriminate any type of rejection including borderline changes from no rejection was at 0.72 (95% CI 0.62–0.83). In patients receiving anti-rejection treatment, dd-cfDNA levels significantly decreased during the 7, 30, and 90 days follow-up compared to levels at the time of biopsy (p = 0.006, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, dd-cfDNA significantly discriminates active rejection from no rejection. Decreasing dd-cfDNA following anti-rejection treatment may indicate response to therapy.Clinical Trial Registration: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00023604, identifier DRKS00023604.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T12:59:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd27de4fe00d46a19c12bf2a47c50f5f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1432-2277
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T12:59:04Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Transplant International
spelling doaj.art-dd27de4fe00d46a19c12bf2a47c50f5f2024-04-05T16:34:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Transplant International1432-22772023-11-013610.3389/ti.2023.1189911899Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Indication Biopsy—Results of a Prospective Single-Center TrialLouise Benning0Christian Morath1Annette Fink2Markus Rudek3Claudius Speer4Florian Kälble5Christian Nusshag6Jörg Beimler7Constantin Schwab8Rüdiger Waldherr9Martin Zeier10Caner Süsal11Caner Süsal12Thuong Hien Tran13Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyInstitute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyInstitute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyTransplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, TürkiyeInstitute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDonor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) identifies allograft injury and discriminates active rejection from no rejection. In this prospective study, 106 kidney transplant recipients with 108 clinically indicated biopsies were enrolled at Heidelberg University Hospital between November 2020 and December 2022 to validate the clinical value of dd-cfDNA in a cohort of German patients. dd-cfDNA was quantified at biopsy and correlated to histopathology. Additionally, dd-cfDNA was determined on days 7, 30, and 90 post-biopsy and analyzed for potential use to monitor response to anti-rejection treatment. dd-cfDNA levels were with a median (IQR) % of 2.00 (0.48–3.20) highest in patients with ABMR, followed by 0.92 (0.19–11.25) in patients with TCMR, 0.44 (0.20–1.10) in patients with borderline changes and 0.20 (0.11–0.53) in patients with no signs of rejection. The AUC for dd-cfDNA to discriminate any type of rejection including borderline changes from no rejection was at 0.72 (95% CI 0.62–0.83). In patients receiving anti-rejection treatment, dd-cfDNA levels significantly decreased during the 7, 30, and 90 days follow-up compared to levels at the time of biopsy (p = 0.006, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, dd-cfDNA significantly discriminates active rejection from no rejection. Decreasing dd-cfDNA following anti-rejection treatment may indicate response to therapy.Clinical Trial Registration: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00023604, identifier DRKS00023604.https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2023.11899/fulldonor-derived cell-free DNAdd-cfDNAkidney transplantationrejectionresponse to therapy
spellingShingle Louise Benning
Christian Morath
Annette Fink
Markus Rudek
Claudius Speer
Florian Kälble
Christian Nusshag
Jörg Beimler
Constantin Schwab
Rüdiger Waldherr
Martin Zeier
Caner Süsal
Caner Süsal
Thuong Hien Tran
Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Indication Biopsy—Results of a Prospective Single-Center Trial
Transplant International
donor-derived cell-free DNA
dd-cfDNA
kidney transplantation
rejection
response to therapy
title Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Indication Biopsy—Results of a Prospective Single-Center Trial
title_full Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Indication Biopsy—Results of a Prospective Single-Center Trial
title_fullStr Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Indication Biopsy—Results of a Prospective Single-Center Trial
title_full_unstemmed Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Indication Biopsy—Results of a Prospective Single-Center Trial
title_short Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Indication Biopsy—Results of a Prospective Single-Center Trial
title_sort donor derived cell free dna dd cfdna in kidney transplant recipients with indication biopsy results of a prospective single center trial
topic donor-derived cell-free DNA
dd-cfDNA
kidney transplantation
rejection
response to therapy
url https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2023.11899/full
work_keys_str_mv AT louisebenning donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT christianmorath donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT annettefink donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT markusrudek donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT claudiusspeer donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT floriankalble donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT christiannusshag donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT jorgbeimler donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT constantinschwab donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT rudigerwaldherr donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT martinzeier donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT canersusal donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT canersusal donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial
AT thuonghientran donorderivedcellfreednaddcfdnainkidneytransplantrecipientswithindicationbiopsyresultsofaprospectivesinglecentertrial