Numerical Simulation Based on the Canister Test for Shale Gas Content Calculation

The accurate determination of the gas in place in shale reservoirs is a basic but challenging issue for shale gas evaluation. Conventional canister gas desorption tests on retrieved core samples and subsequent data analyses (via linear or polynomial regression)—originally developed for coalbed metha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shujuan Kang, Le Lu, Hui Tian, Yunfeng Yang, Chengyang Jiang, Qisheng Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6518
_version_ 1797514762898112512
author Shujuan Kang
Le Lu
Hui Tian
Yunfeng Yang
Chengyang Jiang
Qisheng Ma
author_facet Shujuan Kang
Le Lu
Hui Tian
Yunfeng Yang
Chengyang Jiang
Qisheng Ma
author_sort Shujuan Kang
collection DOAJ
description The accurate determination of the gas in place in shale reservoirs is a basic but challenging issue for shale gas evaluation. Conventional canister gas desorption tests on retrieved core samples and subsequent data analyses (via linear or polynomial regression)—originally developed for coalbed methane, where gases are mainly stored in the adsorbed phase—is unadvisable for shale gas, which is stored as an appreciable amount of free gas in shale reservoirs. In the present study, a mathematical model that simultaneously takes into account gas expansion, adsorption/desorption, and the gas flow in shale is proposed to simulate gas release from a core sample retrieved from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of the Fuling shale gas field, Sichuan Basin. The results indicate that, compared with the value of 2.11 m<sup>3</sup>/t rock estimated with the traditional United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) method, the total gas in place within the studied Longmaxi Shale estimated with our mathematical model under reservoir pressure conditions is up to 5.88 m<sup>3</sup>/t rock, which is more consistent with the result from the new volumetric approach based on Ambrose et al. According to our mathematical model, the content of free gas is 4.11 m<sup>3</sup>/t rock at true “time zero”, which accounts for 69.9% of the total gas. On the other hand, the lost gas portion is determined to be up to 4.88 m<sup>3</sup>/t rock (~85% of the total gas). These results suggest that the majority of the free shale gas is actually trapped within the pore space of the shale formation.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:36:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd3119e028574a69bcd97c9792561678
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:36:05Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-dd3119e028574a69bcd97c97925616782023-11-22T18:04:24ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-10-011420651810.3390/en14206518Numerical Simulation Based on the Canister Test for Shale Gas Content CalculationShujuan Kang0Le Lu1Hui Tian2Yunfeng Yang3Chengyang Jiang4Qisheng Ma5CAS Engineering Laboratory for Deep Resources Equipment and Technology, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, ChinaPower Environmental & Energy Research Institute, Covina, CA 91722, USAState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaSuzhou Grand Energy Technology Ltd., Suzhou 215129, ChinaPower Environmental & Energy Research Institute, Covina, CA 91722, USAChemEOR Inc., Covina, CA 91722, USAThe accurate determination of the gas in place in shale reservoirs is a basic but challenging issue for shale gas evaluation. Conventional canister gas desorption tests on retrieved core samples and subsequent data analyses (via linear or polynomial regression)—originally developed for coalbed methane, where gases are mainly stored in the adsorbed phase—is unadvisable for shale gas, which is stored as an appreciable amount of free gas in shale reservoirs. In the present study, a mathematical model that simultaneously takes into account gas expansion, adsorption/desorption, and the gas flow in shale is proposed to simulate gas release from a core sample retrieved from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of the Fuling shale gas field, Sichuan Basin. The results indicate that, compared with the value of 2.11 m<sup>3</sup>/t rock estimated with the traditional United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) method, the total gas in place within the studied Longmaxi Shale estimated with our mathematical model under reservoir pressure conditions is up to 5.88 m<sup>3</sup>/t rock, which is more consistent with the result from the new volumetric approach based on Ambrose et al. According to our mathematical model, the content of free gas is 4.11 m<sup>3</sup>/t rock at true “time zero”, which accounts for 69.9% of the total gas. On the other hand, the lost gas portion is determined to be up to 4.88 m<sup>3</sup>/t rock (~85% of the total gas). These results suggest that the majority of the free shale gas is actually trapped within the pore space of the shale formation.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6518shale gasmathematical modelcanister testgas contentLongmaxi Shale
spellingShingle Shujuan Kang
Le Lu
Hui Tian
Yunfeng Yang
Chengyang Jiang
Qisheng Ma
Numerical Simulation Based on the Canister Test for Shale Gas Content Calculation
Energies
shale gas
mathematical model
canister test
gas content
Longmaxi Shale
title Numerical Simulation Based on the Canister Test for Shale Gas Content Calculation
title_full Numerical Simulation Based on the Canister Test for Shale Gas Content Calculation
title_fullStr Numerical Simulation Based on the Canister Test for Shale Gas Content Calculation
title_full_unstemmed Numerical Simulation Based on the Canister Test for Shale Gas Content Calculation
title_short Numerical Simulation Based on the Canister Test for Shale Gas Content Calculation
title_sort numerical simulation based on the canister test for shale gas content calculation
topic shale gas
mathematical model
canister test
gas content
Longmaxi Shale
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6518
work_keys_str_mv AT shujuankang numericalsimulationbasedonthecanistertestforshalegascontentcalculation
AT lelu numericalsimulationbasedonthecanistertestforshalegascontentcalculation
AT huitian numericalsimulationbasedonthecanistertestforshalegascontentcalculation
AT yunfengyang numericalsimulationbasedonthecanistertestforshalegascontentcalculation
AT chengyangjiang numericalsimulationbasedonthecanistertestforshalegascontentcalculation
AT qishengma numericalsimulationbasedonthecanistertestforshalegascontentcalculation