Values in dialogic pedagogy

In November 2014 on the Dialogic Pedagogy Journal Facebook page, there was an interesting discussion of the issue of values in dialogic pedagogy<a title="" href="file:///C:/Users/Eugene/Documents/Manuscripts/Values%20in%20dialogic%20pedagogy.2014/Values%20in%20dialogic%20pedagogy,%...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eugene Matusov, Jay Lemke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2015-02-01
Series:Dialogic Pedagogy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/141
_version_ 1818512904565030912
author Eugene Matusov
Jay Lemke
author_facet Eugene Matusov
Jay Lemke
author_sort Eugene Matusov
collection DOAJ
description In November 2014 on the Dialogic Pedagogy Journal Facebook page, there was an interesting discussion of the issue of values in dialogic pedagogy<a title="" href="file:///C:/Users/Eugene/Documents/Manuscripts/Values%20in%20dialogic%20pedagogy.2014/Values%20in%20dialogic%20pedagogy,%20draft%237,%20final,%202015-01-29.docx#_ftn1">[1]</a>. The main issue can be characterized as the following. Should dialogic pedagogy teach values? Should it avoid teaching values? Is there some kind of a third approach? The participants of the Facebook discussions were focusing on <em>teaching values</em> in dialogic pedagogy and not about teaching <em>about</em>values. On the one hand, it seems to be impossible to avoid teaching values. However, on the other hand, shaping students in some preset molding is apparently non-dialogic and uncritical (Matusov, 2009). In the former case, successful teaching is defined by how well and deeply the students accept and commit to the taught values. In the latter case, successful dialogic teaching may be defined by students’ critical examination of their own values against alternative values in a critical dialogue. Below, Eugene Matusov and Jay Lemke, active participants of this Facebook dialogue, provide their reflection on this important issue and encourage readers to join their reflective dialogue.<div><br clear="all" /><hr align="left" size="1" width="33%" /><div><p><a title="" href="file:///C:/Users/Eugene/Documents/Manuscripts/Values%20in%20dialogic%20pedagogy.2014/Values%20in%20dialogic%20pedagogy,%20draft%237,%20final,%202015-01-29.docx#_ftnref1">[1]</a> See in a public Facebook domain: <a href="https://www.facebook.com/DialogicPedagogyJournal/posts/894734337204533">https://www.facebook.com/DialogicPedagogyJournal/posts/894734337204533</a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/DialogicPedagogyJournal/posts/896916850319615">https://www.facebook.com/DialogicPedagogyJournal/posts/896916850319615</a></p></div></div>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T23:53:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd37dcb324c84c97b3485719d31cbeef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2325-3290
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T23:53:30Z
publishDate 2015-02-01
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
record_format Article
series Dialogic Pedagogy
spelling doaj.art-dd37dcb324c84c97b3485719d31cbeef2022-12-22T01:28:40ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghDialogic Pedagogy2325-32902015-02-013010.5195/dpj.2015.14154Values in dialogic pedagogyEugene Matusov0Jay Lemke1School of Education University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United StatesUniversity of California at San DiegoIn November 2014 on the Dialogic Pedagogy Journal Facebook page, there was an interesting discussion of the issue of values in dialogic pedagogy<a title="" href="file:///C:/Users/Eugene/Documents/Manuscripts/Values%20in%20dialogic%20pedagogy.2014/Values%20in%20dialogic%20pedagogy,%20draft%237,%20final,%202015-01-29.docx#_ftn1">[1]</a>. The main issue can be characterized as the following. Should dialogic pedagogy teach values? Should it avoid teaching values? Is there some kind of a third approach? The participants of the Facebook discussions were focusing on <em>teaching values</em> in dialogic pedagogy and not about teaching <em>about</em>values. On the one hand, it seems to be impossible to avoid teaching values. However, on the other hand, shaping students in some preset molding is apparently non-dialogic and uncritical (Matusov, 2009). In the former case, successful teaching is defined by how well and deeply the students accept and commit to the taught values. In the latter case, successful dialogic teaching may be defined by students’ critical examination of their own values against alternative values in a critical dialogue. Below, Eugene Matusov and Jay Lemke, active participants of this Facebook dialogue, provide their reflection on this important issue and encourage readers to join their reflective dialogue.<div><br clear="all" /><hr align="left" size="1" width="33%" /><div><p><a title="" href="file:///C:/Users/Eugene/Documents/Manuscripts/Values%20in%20dialogic%20pedagogy.2014/Values%20in%20dialogic%20pedagogy,%20draft%237,%20final,%202015-01-29.docx#_ftnref1">[1]</a> See in a public Facebook domain: <a href="https://www.facebook.com/DialogicPedagogyJournal/posts/894734337204533">https://www.facebook.com/DialogicPedagogyJournal/posts/894734337204533</a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/DialogicPedagogyJournal/posts/896916850319615">https://www.facebook.com/DialogicPedagogyJournal/posts/896916850319615</a></p></div></div>http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/141valuesdialogic pedagogyaxiologyontologypluralismdemocracy
spellingShingle Eugene Matusov
Jay Lemke
Values in dialogic pedagogy
Dialogic Pedagogy
values
dialogic pedagogy
axiology
ontology
pluralism
democracy
title Values in dialogic pedagogy
title_full Values in dialogic pedagogy
title_fullStr Values in dialogic pedagogy
title_full_unstemmed Values in dialogic pedagogy
title_short Values in dialogic pedagogy
title_sort values in dialogic pedagogy
topic values
dialogic pedagogy
axiology
ontology
pluralism
democracy
url http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/141
work_keys_str_mv AT eugenematusov valuesindialogicpedagogy
AT jaylemke valuesindialogicpedagogy