Value of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Prognostic Assessment of Patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is associated with high rates of comorbidities and non-infectious lung disease mortality. Against this background, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic capacity of lung function and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients with ILD. Materials and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beate Stubbe, Till Ittermann, Anita Grieger, Charlotte Walther, Sven Gläser, Ralf Ewert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/6/1609
Description
Summary:Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is associated with high rates of comorbidities and non-infectious lung disease mortality. Against this background, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic capacity of lung function and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients with ILD. Materials and Methods: A total of 183 patients with diverse ILD entities were included in this monocentric analysis. Prediction models were determined using Cox regression models with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and all parameters from pulmonary function testing and CPET. Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted for selected variables. Results: The median follow-up period was 3.0 ± 2.5 years. Arterial hypertension (57%) and pulmonary hypertension (38%) were the leading comorbidities. The Charlson comorbidity index score was 2 ± 2 points. The 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 68% and 50%, respectively. VO<sub>2</sub>peak (mL/kg/min or %pred.) was identified as a significant prognostic parameter in patients with ILD. The cut-off value for discriminating mortality was 61%. Conclusion: The present analyses consistently revealed the high prognostic power of VO<sub>2</sub>peak %pred. and other parameters evaluating breathing efficacy (VÉ/VCO<sub>2</sub> @AT und VÉ/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope) in ILD patients. VO<sub>2</sub>peak %pred., in contrast to the established prognostic values FVC %pred., DLCO/KCO %pred., and GAP, showed an even higher prognostic ability in all statistical models.
ISSN:2077-0383