What makes the Wuhan virus American?

From the sociolinguistic perspective, conspiracy theories (CT), which convey heterodox forms of knowledge that diverge from accepted narratives, are worth examining since their discourses abound in persuasive language. Still, the discourse of CTs is under-researched (Demata/Zorzi/ Zottola 2022). Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Natalia Borza
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Bern Open Publishing 2023-03-01
Series:Linguistik Online
Online Access:https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/9476
_version_ 1811160332354191360
author Natalia Borza
author_facet Natalia Borza
author_sort Natalia Borza
collection DOAJ
description From the sociolinguistic perspective, conspiracy theories (CT), which convey heterodox forms of knowledge that diverge from accepted narratives, are worth examining since their discourses abound in persuasive language. Still, the discourse of CTs is under-researched (Demata/Zorzi/ Zottola 2022). The present empirical, discourse-analytical case study seeks to address this lacuna by exploring the discursive (de)legitimation strategies of conspiracy discourse in competing narrative frames. The research adopted the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) perspective, and the comparative analysis was carried out within the methodological framework developed by van Leeuwen (2008) and Tankard (2001). The findings complement van Leeuwen’s “grammar of legitimation”, and also contribute to existing knowledge on framing theories. The results of the explorative case study indicate that the persuasiveness of the discursive strategies of (de)legitimisation depends on several features, such as synergy, projection, the sense of belonging, silencing with blockers, implying the generality of specific cases, and the partial investigation of causality.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:55:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd455f875ff7483589530109fc1f6ae1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1615-3014
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:55:36Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Bern Open Publishing
record_format Article
series Linguistik Online
spelling doaj.art-dd455f875ff7483589530109fc1f6ae12023-03-03T16:37:42ZdeuBern Open PublishingLinguistik Online1615-30142023-03-01119110.13092/lo.119.9476What makes the Wuhan virus American?Natalia Borza From the sociolinguistic perspective, conspiracy theories (CT), which convey heterodox forms of knowledge that diverge from accepted narratives, are worth examining since their discourses abound in persuasive language. Still, the discourse of CTs is under-researched (Demata/Zorzi/ Zottola 2022). The present empirical, discourse-analytical case study seeks to address this lacuna by exploring the discursive (de)legitimation strategies of conspiracy discourse in competing narrative frames. The research adopted the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) perspective, and the comparative analysis was carried out within the methodological framework developed by van Leeuwen (2008) and Tankard (2001). The findings complement van Leeuwen’s “grammar of legitimation”, and also contribute to existing knowledge on framing theories. The results of the explorative case study indicate that the persuasiveness of the discursive strategies of (de)legitimisation depends on several features, such as synergy, projection, the sense of belonging, silencing with blockers, implying the generality of specific cases, and the partial investigation of causality. https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/9476
spellingShingle Natalia Borza
What makes the Wuhan virus American?
Linguistik Online
title What makes the Wuhan virus American?
title_full What makes the Wuhan virus American?
title_fullStr What makes the Wuhan virus American?
title_full_unstemmed What makes the Wuhan virus American?
title_short What makes the Wuhan virus American?
title_sort what makes the wuhan virus american
url https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/9476
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliaborza whatmakesthewuhanvirusamerican