Testing an optimality-based model of rooting zone water storage capacity in temperate forests

<p>Rooting zone water storage capacity <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> is a crucial parameter for modeling hydrology, ecosystem gas exchange and vegetation dynamics. Despite its importance, this parameter is still poorly constrained and subject to high uncertainty. We tested th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. J. R. Speich, H. Lischke, M. Zappa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-07-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/22/4097/2018/hess-22-4097-2018.pdf
_version_ 1818535824128475136
author M. J. R. Speich
M. J. R. Speich
M. J. R. Speich
M. J. R. Speich
H. Lischke
M. Zappa
author_facet M. J. R. Speich
M. J. R. Speich
M. J. R. Speich
M. J. R. Speich
H. Lischke
M. Zappa
author_sort M. J. R. Speich
collection DOAJ
description <p>Rooting zone water storage capacity <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> is a crucial parameter for modeling hydrology, ecosystem gas exchange and vegetation dynamics. Despite its importance, this parameter is still poorly constrained and subject to high uncertainty. We tested the analytical, optimality-based model of effective rooting depth proposed by Guswa (2008, 2010) with regard to its applicability for parameterizing <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> in temperate forests. The model assumes that plants dimension their rooting systems to maximize net carbon gain. Results from this model were compared against values obtained by calibrating a local water balance model against latent heat flux and soil moisture observations from 15 eddy covariance sites. Then, the effect of optimality-based <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> estimates on the performance of local water balance predictions was assessed during model validation.</p><p>The agreement between calibrated and optimality-based <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> varied greatly across climates and forest types. At a majority of cold and temperate sites, the <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> estimates were similar for both methods, and the water balance model performed equally well when parameterized with calibrated and with optimality-based <i>S</i><sub>r</sub>. At spruce-dominated sites, optimality-based <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> were much larger than calibrated values. However, this did not affect the performance of the water balance model. On the other hand, at the Mediterranean sites considered in this study, optimality-based <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> were consistently much smaller than calibrated values. The same was the case at pine-dominated sites on sandy soils. Accordingly, performance of the water balance model was much worse at these sites when optimality-based <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> were used. This rooting depth parameterization might be used in dynamic (eco)hydrological models under cold and temperate conditions, either to estimate <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> without calibration or as a model component. This could greatly increase the reliability of transient climate-impact assessment studies. On the other hand, the results from this study do not warrant the application of this model to Mediterranean climates or on very coarse soils. While the cause of these mismatches cannot be determined with certainty, it is possible that trees under these conditions follow rooting strategies that differ from the carbon budget optimization assumed by the model.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T18:30:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd49457d44ab444bb0bba5926a842963
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T18:30:04Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-dd49457d44ab444bb0bba5926a8429632022-12-22T00:54:57ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382018-07-01224097412410.5194/hess-22-4097-2018Testing an optimality-based model of rooting zone water storage capacity in temperate forestsM. J. R. Speich0M. J. R. Speich1M. J. R. Speich2M. J. R. Speich3H. Lischke4M. Zappa5Dynamic Macroecology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 8903 Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandHydrological Forecasts, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 8903 Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerlandnow at: Biometry and Environmental Systems Analysis, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg i. Br., GermanyDynamic Macroecology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 8903 Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandHydrological Forecasts, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland<p>Rooting zone water storage capacity <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> is a crucial parameter for modeling hydrology, ecosystem gas exchange and vegetation dynamics. Despite its importance, this parameter is still poorly constrained and subject to high uncertainty. We tested the analytical, optimality-based model of effective rooting depth proposed by Guswa (2008, 2010) with regard to its applicability for parameterizing <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> in temperate forests. The model assumes that plants dimension their rooting systems to maximize net carbon gain. Results from this model were compared against values obtained by calibrating a local water balance model against latent heat flux and soil moisture observations from 15 eddy covariance sites. Then, the effect of optimality-based <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> estimates on the performance of local water balance predictions was assessed during model validation.</p><p>The agreement between calibrated and optimality-based <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> varied greatly across climates and forest types. At a majority of cold and temperate sites, the <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> estimates were similar for both methods, and the water balance model performed equally well when parameterized with calibrated and with optimality-based <i>S</i><sub>r</sub>. At spruce-dominated sites, optimality-based <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> were much larger than calibrated values. However, this did not affect the performance of the water balance model. On the other hand, at the Mediterranean sites considered in this study, optimality-based <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> were consistently much smaller than calibrated values. The same was the case at pine-dominated sites on sandy soils. Accordingly, performance of the water balance model was much worse at these sites when optimality-based <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> were used. This rooting depth parameterization might be used in dynamic (eco)hydrological models under cold and temperate conditions, either to estimate <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> without calibration or as a model component. This could greatly increase the reliability of transient climate-impact assessment studies. On the other hand, the results from this study do not warrant the application of this model to Mediterranean climates or on very coarse soils. While the cause of these mismatches cannot be determined with certainty, it is possible that trees under these conditions follow rooting strategies that differ from the carbon budget optimization assumed by the model.</p>https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/22/4097/2018/hess-22-4097-2018.pdf
spellingShingle M. J. R. Speich
M. J. R. Speich
M. J. R. Speich
M. J. R. Speich
H. Lischke
M. Zappa
Testing an optimality-based model of rooting zone water storage capacity in temperate forests
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title Testing an optimality-based model of rooting zone water storage capacity in temperate forests
title_full Testing an optimality-based model of rooting zone water storage capacity in temperate forests
title_fullStr Testing an optimality-based model of rooting zone water storage capacity in temperate forests
title_full_unstemmed Testing an optimality-based model of rooting zone water storage capacity in temperate forests
title_short Testing an optimality-based model of rooting zone water storage capacity in temperate forests
title_sort testing an optimality based model of rooting zone water storage capacity in temperate forests
url https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/22/4097/2018/hess-22-4097-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mjrspeich testinganoptimalitybasedmodelofrootingzonewaterstoragecapacityintemperateforests
AT mjrspeich testinganoptimalitybasedmodelofrootingzonewaterstoragecapacityintemperateforests
AT mjrspeich testinganoptimalitybasedmodelofrootingzonewaterstoragecapacityintemperateforests
AT mjrspeich testinganoptimalitybasedmodelofrootingzonewaterstoragecapacityintemperateforests
AT hlischke testinganoptimalitybasedmodelofrootingzonewaterstoragecapacityintemperateforests
AT mzappa testinganoptimalitybasedmodelofrootingzonewaterstoragecapacityintemperateforests