Using 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to validate computational fluid dynamics: a case study

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can have a complementary predictive role alongside the exquisite visualization capabilities of 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. In order to exploit these capabilities (e.g. for decision-making) it is necessary to validate computational models aga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giovanni eBiglino, Daria eCosentino, Jennifer eSteeden, Lorenzo eDe Nova, Matteo eCastelli, Hopewell eNtsinjana, Giancarlo ePennati, Andrew eTaylor, Silvia eSchievano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fped.2015.00107/full
_version_ 1828492728429707264
author Giovanni eBiglino
Daria eCosentino
Jennifer eSteeden
Lorenzo eDe Nova
Matteo eCastelli
Hopewell eNtsinjana
Giancarlo ePennati
Andrew eTaylor
Silvia eSchievano
author_facet Giovanni eBiglino
Daria eCosentino
Jennifer eSteeden
Lorenzo eDe Nova
Matteo eCastelli
Hopewell eNtsinjana
Giancarlo ePennati
Andrew eTaylor
Silvia eSchievano
author_sort Giovanni eBiglino
collection DOAJ
description Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can have a complementary predictive role alongside the exquisite visualization capabilities of 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. In order to exploit these capabilities (e.g. for decision-making) it is necessary to validate computational models against real world data. In this study we sought to acquire 4D CMR flow data in a controllable, experimental setup and use these data to validate a corresponding computational model. We applied this paradigm to a case of congenital heart disease, namely transposition of the great arteries (TGA) repaired with arterial switch operation (ASO). For this purpose, a mock circulatory loop compatible with the CMR environment was constructed and two detailed aortic 3D models (i.e. one TGA case and one normal aortic anatomy) were tested under realistic hemodynamic conditions, acquired 4D CMR flow. The same 3D domains were used for multi-scale CFD simulations, whereby the remainder of the mock circulatory system was appropriately summarized with a lumped parameter network (LPN). Boundary conditions of the simulations mirrored those measured in vitro. Results showed a very good quantitative agreement between experimental and computational models in terms of pressure (overall maximum % error = 4.4% aortic pressure in the control anatomy) and flow distribution data (overall maximum % error = 3.6% at the subclavian artery outlet of the TGA model). Very good qualitative agreement could also be appreciated in terms of streamlines, throughout the cardiac cycle. Additionally, velocity vectors in the ascending aorta revealed less symmetrical flow in the TGA model, which also exhibited higher wall shear stress in the anterior ascending aorta.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T11:25:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd4e0036fbe54f74921b070a6cb15c0b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T11:25:41Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-dd4e0036fbe54f74921b070a6cb15c0b2022-12-22T01:09:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602015-12-01310.3389/fped.2015.00107151141Using 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to validate computational fluid dynamics: a case studyGiovanni eBiglino0Daria eCosentino1Jennifer eSteeden2Lorenzo eDe Nova3Matteo eCastelli4Hopewell eNtsinjana5Giancarlo ePennati6Andrew eTaylor7Silvia eSchievano8University College London (Institute of Cardiovascular Science)University College London (Institute of Cardiovascular Science)University College London (Institute of Cardiovascular Science)Politecnico di MilanoPolitecnico di MilanoUniversity College London (Institute of Cardiovascular Science)Politecnico di MilanoUniversity College London (Institute of Cardiovascular Science)University College London (Institute of Cardiovascular Science)Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can have a complementary predictive role alongside the exquisite visualization capabilities of 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. In order to exploit these capabilities (e.g. for decision-making) it is necessary to validate computational models against real world data. In this study we sought to acquire 4D CMR flow data in a controllable, experimental setup and use these data to validate a corresponding computational model. We applied this paradigm to a case of congenital heart disease, namely transposition of the great arteries (TGA) repaired with arterial switch operation (ASO). For this purpose, a mock circulatory loop compatible with the CMR environment was constructed and two detailed aortic 3D models (i.e. one TGA case and one normal aortic anatomy) were tested under realistic hemodynamic conditions, acquired 4D CMR flow. The same 3D domains were used for multi-scale CFD simulations, whereby the remainder of the mock circulatory system was appropriately summarized with a lumped parameter network (LPN). Boundary conditions of the simulations mirrored those measured in vitro. Results showed a very good quantitative agreement between experimental and computational models in terms of pressure (overall maximum % error = 4.4% aortic pressure in the control anatomy) and flow distribution data (overall maximum % error = 3.6% at the subclavian artery outlet of the TGA model). Very good qualitative agreement could also be appreciated in terms of streamlines, throughout the cardiac cycle. Additionally, velocity vectors in the ascending aorta revealed less symmetrical flow in the TGA model, which also exhibited higher wall shear stress in the anterior ascending aorta.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fped.2015.00107/fullValidationRapid prototypingcongenital heart disease (CHD)cardiovascular magnetic resonance imagingMock circulatory loop
spellingShingle Giovanni eBiglino
Daria eCosentino
Jennifer eSteeden
Lorenzo eDe Nova
Matteo eCastelli
Hopewell eNtsinjana
Giancarlo ePennati
Andrew eTaylor
Silvia eSchievano
Using 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to validate computational fluid dynamics: a case study
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Validation
Rapid prototyping
congenital heart disease (CHD)
cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Mock circulatory loop
title Using 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to validate computational fluid dynamics: a case study
title_full Using 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to validate computational fluid dynamics: a case study
title_fullStr Using 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to validate computational fluid dynamics: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Using 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to validate computational fluid dynamics: a case study
title_short Using 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to validate computational fluid dynamics: a case study
title_sort using 4d cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to validate computational fluid dynamics a case study
topic Validation
Rapid prototyping
congenital heart disease (CHD)
cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Mock circulatory loop
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fped.2015.00107/full
work_keys_str_mv AT giovanniebiglino using4dcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingtovalidatecomputationalfluiddynamicsacasestudy
AT dariaecosentino using4dcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingtovalidatecomputationalfluiddynamicsacasestudy
AT jenniferesteeden using4dcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingtovalidatecomputationalfluiddynamicsacasestudy
AT lorenzoedenova using4dcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingtovalidatecomputationalfluiddynamicsacasestudy
AT matteoecastelli using4dcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingtovalidatecomputationalfluiddynamicsacasestudy
AT hopewellentsinjana using4dcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingtovalidatecomputationalfluiddynamicsacasestudy
AT giancarloepennati using4dcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingtovalidatecomputationalfluiddynamicsacasestudy
AT andrewetaylor using4dcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingtovalidatecomputationalfluiddynamicsacasestudy
AT silviaeschievano using4dcardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingtovalidatecomputationalfluiddynamicsacasestudy