The Role of CCUS Clusters and Hubs in Reaching Carbon Neutrality: Case Study from the Baltic Sea Region

The cross-border case study for the Baltic Sea Region includes the large emission sources from energy production, the cement industry, refineries, waste-to-energy plants and other large bio-emissions, identified in the Baltic States. The need to combine CO2 emission sources from three countries into...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alla Shogenova, Kazbulat Shogenov, Saulius Sliaupa, Rasa Sliaupiene
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2023-11-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:http://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/13767
_version_ 1827622816608944128
author Alla Shogenova
Kazbulat Shogenov
Saulius Sliaupa
Rasa Sliaupiene
author_facet Alla Shogenova
Kazbulat Shogenov
Saulius Sliaupa
Rasa Sliaupiene
author_sort Alla Shogenova
collection DOAJ
description The cross-border case study for the Baltic Sea Region includes the large emission sources from energy production, the cement industry, refineries, waste-to-energy plants and other large bio-emissions, identified in the Baltic States. The need to combine CO2 emission sources from three countries into large CCUS cluster projects is explained by geological and regulatory limitations. Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are situated within the common Baltic sedimentary basin. The best geological conditions for CO2 geological storage are available in Latvia. In 2021 three countries produced about 15.9 Mt of large CO2 emissions, including more than 2.2 Mt of bio-CO2 emissions, located not far from the existing gas pipelines, which could connect emitters with storage sites and ports. The average optimistic storage capacity of the Cambrian Deimena Regional stage sandstones in the E6 structure, located 80 km from the Port of Klaipeda, is about 365 Mt CO2. The largest onshore storage sites Dobele, North-Blidene and Blidene have a total average optimistic storage capacity of about 402.6 Mt. CO2 emissions from three countries, including bio-emissions, could be captured, transported, used and stored in geological structures during more than 50 years. The regulatory process to permit CO2 storage in Latvia has been started, initiated by Latvian largest CO2 producers. Considering that 14% of the reported emissions are of biological origin, carbon neutrality could be reached in the Baltic States. Hydrogen production and storage and geothermal energy recovery using CO2 could be combined in the proposed CCUS clusters, using for H2 storage small E6-B compartment of the E6 structure offshore and Blidene structure onshore.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T11:33:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd4f4f0e9a404c158c4dff1174809307
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2283-9216
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T11:33:02Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
record_format Article
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
spelling doaj.art-dd4f4f0e9a404c158c4dff11748093072023-11-30T23:49:07ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162023-11-0110510.3303/CET23105029The Role of CCUS Clusters and Hubs in Reaching Carbon Neutrality: Case Study from the Baltic Sea RegionAlla ShogenovaKazbulat ShogenovSaulius SliaupaRasa SliaupieneThe cross-border case study for the Baltic Sea Region includes the large emission sources from energy production, the cement industry, refineries, waste-to-energy plants and other large bio-emissions, identified in the Baltic States. The need to combine CO2 emission sources from three countries into large CCUS cluster projects is explained by geological and regulatory limitations. Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are situated within the common Baltic sedimentary basin. The best geological conditions for CO2 geological storage are available in Latvia. In 2021 three countries produced about 15.9 Mt of large CO2 emissions, including more than 2.2 Mt of bio-CO2 emissions, located not far from the existing gas pipelines, which could connect emitters with storage sites and ports. The average optimistic storage capacity of the Cambrian Deimena Regional stage sandstones in the E6 structure, located 80 km from the Port of Klaipeda, is about 365 Mt CO2. The largest onshore storage sites Dobele, North-Blidene and Blidene have a total average optimistic storage capacity of about 402.6 Mt. CO2 emissions from three countries, including bio-emissions, could be captured, transported, used and stored in geological structures during more than 50 years. The regulatory process to permit CO2 storage in Latvia has been started, initiated by Latvian largest CO2 producers. Considering that 14% of the reported emissions are of biological origin, carbon neutrality could be reached in the Baltic States. Hydrogen production and storage and geothermal energy recovery using CO2 could be combined in the proposed CCUS clusters, using for H2 storage small E6-B compartment of the E6 structure offshore and Blidene structure onshore.http://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/13767
spellingShingle Alla Shogenova
Kazbulat Shogenov
Saulius Sliaupa
Rasa Sliaupiene
The Role of CCUS Clusters and Hubs in Reaching Carbon Neutrality: Case Study from the Baltic Sea Region
Chemical Engineering Transactions
title The Role of CCUS Clusters and Hubs in Reaching Carbon Neutrality: Case Study from the Baltic Sea Region
title_full The Role of CCUS Clusters and Hubs in Reaching Carbon Neutrality: Case Study from the Baltic Sea Region
title_fullStr The Role of CCUS Clusters and Hubs in Reaching Carbon Neutrality: Case Study from the Baltic Sea Region
title_full_unstemmed The Role of CCUS Clusters and Hubs in Reaching Carbon Neutrality: Case Study from the Baltic Sea Region
title_short The Role of CCUS Clusters and Hubs in Reaching Carbon Neutrality: Case Study from the Baltic Sea Region
title_sort role of ccus clusters and hubs in reaching carbon neutrality case study from the baltic sea region
url http://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/13767
work_keys_str_mv AT allashogenova theroleofccusclustersandhubsinreachingcarbonneutralitycasestudyfromthebalticsearegion
AT kazbulatshogenov theroleofccusclustersandhubsinreachingcarbonneutralitycasestudyfromthebalticsearegion
AT sauliussliaupa theroleofccusclustersandhubsinreachingcarbonneutralitycasestudyfromthebalticsearegion
AT rasasliaupiene theroleofccusclustersandhubsinreachingcarbonneutralitycasestudyfromthebalticsearegion
AT allashogenova roleofccusclustersandhubsinreachingcarbonneutralitycasestudyfromthebalticsearegion
AT kazbulatshogenov roleofccusclustersandhubsinreachingcarbonneutralitycasestudyfromthebalticsearegion
AT sauliussliaupa roleofccusclustersandhubsinreachingcarbonneutralitycasestudyfromthebalticsearegion
AT rasasliaupiene roleofccusclustersandhubsinreachingcarbonneutralitycasestudyfromthebalticsearegion