US and EU Free Trade Agreements and implementation of policies to control tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy food and drinks: A quasi-experimental analysis
<h4>Background</h4> Identifying and tackling the factors that undermine regulation of unhealthy commodities is an essential component of effective noncommunicable disease (NCD) prevention. Unhealthy commodity producers may use rules in US and EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) to challenge...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS Medicine |
| Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815641/?tool=EBI |
| _version_ | 1828070075550138368 |
|---|---|
| author | Pepita Barlow Luke N. Allen |
| author_facet | Pepita Barlow Luke N. Allen |
| author_sort | Pepita Barlow |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4> Identifying and tackling the factors that undermine regulation of unhealthy commodities is an essential component of effective noncommunicable disease (NCD) prevention. Unhealthy commodity producers may use rules in US and EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) to challenge policies targeting their products. We aimed to test whether there was a statistical relationship between US and EU FTA participation and reduced implementation of WHO-recommended policies. <h4>Methods and findings</h4> We performed a statistical analysis assessing the probability of at least partially implementing 10 tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy food and drink policies in 127 countries in 2014, 2016, and 2019. We assessed differences in implementation of these policies in countries with and without US/EU FTAs. We used matching to conduct 48 covariate-adjusted quasi-experimental comparisons across 27 matched US/EU FTA members (87 country-years) and performed additional analyses and robustness checks to assess alternative explanations for our results. Out of our 48 tests, 19% (9/48) identified a statistically significant decrease in the predicted probability of at least partially implementing the unhealthy commodity policy in question, while 2% (1/48) showed an increase. However, there was marked heterogeneity across policies. At the level of individual policies, US FTA participation was associated with a 37% reduction (95%CI: −0.51 to −0.22) in the probability of fully implementing graphic tobacco warning policies, and a 53% reduction (95%CI: −0.63 to −0.43) in the probability of at least partially implementing smoke-free place policies. EU FTA participation was associated with a 28% reduction (95%CI: −0.45 to −0.10) in the probability of fully implementing graphic tobacco warning policies, and a 25% reduction (95%CI: −0.47 to −0.03) in the probability of fully implementing restrictions on child marketing of unhealthy food and drinks. There was a positive association with implementing fat limits and bans, but this was not robust. Associations with other outcomes were not significant. The main limitations included residual confounding, limited ability to discern precise mechanisms of influence, and potentially limited generalisability to other FTAs. <h4>Conclusions</h4> US and EU FTA participation may reduce the probability of implementing WHO-recommended tobacco and child food marketing policies by between a quarter and a half—depending on the FTA and outcome in question. Governments negotiating or participating in US/EU FTAs may need to establish robust health protections and mitigation strategies to achieve their NCD mortality reduction targets. Pepita Barlow and Luke Allen investigate the association between free trade agreement participation and implementation of WHO-recommended policies targeting unhealthy commodities. Author summary <h4>Why was this study done?</h4> Identifying and attending to the factors that inhibit the proper regulation of unhealthy commodities is a pressing priority for governments seeking to accelerate progress towards reducing noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). US and EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) may play a significant role in stalling policy progress by incentivising and empowering unhealthy commodity producers to challenge policies targeting their products in FTA partner countries. However, these agreements also acknowledge governments’ right to regulate and protect public health, and previous studies were unable to establish whether countries with US/EU FTAs are typically less successful at implementing unhealthy commodity policies. <h4>What did the researchers do and find?</h4> We conducted a global statistical analysis assessing the relationship between US and EU FTA participation and implementation of WHO-recommended policies targeting unhealthy commodities. Our large-scale quantitative approach allows for the incorporation of data from many more countries and time periods than previous approaches while addressing key alternative explanations in our main models and >30 additional analyses and robustness checks. We identified a substantial reduction in the predicted probability of implementing select WHO-recommended policies in countries participating in US FTAs and EU FTAs, with the probability of implementing tobacco and child food marketing restrictions reducing by between a quarter and a half depending on the FTA and regulation in question; other associations were not significant. <h4>What do these findings mean?</h4> Our findings indicate that participating in US and EU FTAs is associated with reduced implementation of select unhealthy commodity policies that are crucial to achieving global targets to prevent and reduce NCD-related mortality, morbidity, and associated treatment costs. For countries currently negotiating US/EU FTAs, there is now a potential opportunity to ensure these agreements do not empower unhealthy commodity producers to challenge unhealthy commodity policies and instead empower governments to accelerate NCD policy progress. For countries already participating in US/EU FTAs, governments will need to ensure their policies are not unduly influenced by vested interests that are often concealed in technical discussions about trade rules. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T00:29:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-dd53a73359314daca4e6da77b4b83a66 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1549-1277 1549-1676 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T00:29:56Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS Medicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-dd53a73359314daca4e6da77b4b83a662023-01-08T05:30:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762023-01-01201US and EU Free Trade Agreements and implementation of policies to control tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy food and drinks: A quasi-experimental analysisPepita BarlowLuke N. Allen<h4>Background</h4> Identifying and tackling the factors that undermine regulation of unhealthy commodities is an essential component of effective noncommunicable disease (NCD) prevention. Unhealthy commodity producers may use rules in US and EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) to challenge policies targeting their products. We aimed to test whether there was a statistical relationship between US and EU FTA participation and reduced implementation of WHO-recommended policies. <h4>Methods and findings</h4> We performed a statistical analysis assessing the probability of at least partially implementing 10 tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy food and drink policies in 127 countries in 2014, 2016, and 2019. We assessed differences in implementation of these policies in countries with and without US/EU FTAs. We used matching to conduct 48 covariate-adjusted quasi-experimental comparisons across 27 matched US/EU FTA members (87 country-years) and performed additional analyses and robustness checks to assess alternative explanations for our results. Out of our 48 tests, 19% (9/48) identified a statistically significant decrease in the predicted probability of at least partially implementing the unhealthy commodity policy in question, while 2% (1/48) showed an increase. However, there was marked heterogeneity across policies. At the level of individual policies, US FTA participation was associated with a 37% reduction (95%CI: −0.51 to −0.22) in the probability of fully implementing graphic tobacco warning policies, and a 53% reduction (95%CI: −0.63 to −0.43) in the probability of at least partially implementing smoke-free place policies. EU FTA participation was associated with a 28% reduction (95%CI: −0.45 to −0.10) in the probability of fully implementing graphic tobacco warning policies, and a 25% reduction (95%CI: −0.47 to −0.03) in the probability of fully implementing restrictions on child marketing of unhealthy food and drinks. There was a positive association with implementing fat limits and bans, but this was not robust. Associations with other outcomes were not significant. The main limitations included residual confounding, limited ability to discern precise mechanisms of influence, and potentially limited generalisability to other FTAs. <h4>Conclusions</h4> US and EU FTA participation may reduce the probability of implementing WHO-recommended tobacco and child food marketing policies by between a quarter and a half—depending on the FTA and outcome in question. Governments negotiating or participating in US/EU FTAs may need to establish robust health protections and mitigation strategies to achieve their NCD mortality reduction targets. Pepita Barlow and Luke Allen investigate the association between free trade agreement participation and implementation of WHO-recommended policies targeting unhealthy commodities. Author summary <h4>Why was this study done?</h4> Identifying and attending to the factors that inhibit the proper regulation of unhealthy commodities is a pressing priority for governments seeking to accelerate progress towards reducing noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). US and EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) may play a significant role in stalling policy progress by incentivising and empowering unhealthy commodity producers to challenge policies targeting their products in FTA partner countries. However, these agreements also acknowledge governments’ right to regulate and protect public health, and previous studies were unable to establish whether countries with US/EU FTAs are typically less successful at implementing unhealthy commodity policies. <h4>What did the researchers do and find?</h4> We conducted a global statistical analysis assessing the relationship between US and EU FTA participation and implementation of WHO-recommended policies targeting unhealthy commodities. Our large-scale quantitative approach allows for the incorporation of data from many more countries and time periods than previous approaches while addressing key alternative explanations in our main models and >30 additional analyses and robustness checks. We identified a substantial reduction in the predicted probability of implementing select WHO-recommended policies in countries participating in US FTAs and EU FTAs, with the probability of implementing tobacco and child food marketing restrictions reducing by between a quarter and a half depending on the FTA and regulation in question; other associations were not significant. <h4>What do these findings mean?</h4> Our findings indicate that participating in US and EU FTAs is associated with reduced implementation of select unhealthy commodity policies that are crucial to achieving global targets to prevent and reduce NCD-related mortality, morbidity, and associated treatment costs. For countries currently negotiating US/EU FTAs, there is now a potential opportunity to ensure these agreements do not empower unhealthy commodity producers to challenge unhealthy commodity policies and instead empower governments to accelerate NCD policy progress. For countries already participating in US/EU FTAs, governments will need to ensure their policies are not unduly influenced by vested interests that are often concealed in technical discussions about trade rules.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815641/?tool=EBI |
| spellingShingle | Pepita Barlow Luke N. Allen US and EU Free Trade Agreements and implementation of policies to control tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy food and drinks: A quasi-experimental analysis PLoS Medicine |
| title | US and EU Free Trade Agreements and implementation of policies to control tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy food and drinks: A quasi-experimental analysis |
| title_full | US and EU Free Trade Agreements and implementation of policies to control tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy food and drinks: A quasi-experimental analysis |
| title_fullStr | US and EU Free Trade Agreements and implementation of policies to control tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy food and drinks: A quasi-experimental analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | US and EU Free Trade Agreements and implementation of policies to control tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy food and drinks: A quasi-experimental analysis |
| title_short | US and EU Free Trade Agreements and implementation of policies to control tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy food and drinks: A quasi-experimental analysis |
| title_sort | us and eu free trade agreements and implementation of policies to control tobacco alcohol and unhealthy food and drinks a quasi experimental analysis |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815641/?tool=EBI |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pepitabarlow usandeufreetradeagreementsandimplementationofpoliciestocontroltobaccoalcoholandunhealthyfoodanddrinksaquasiexperimentalanalysis AT lukenallen usandeufreetradeagreementsandimplementationofpoliciestocontroltobaccoalcoholandunhealthyfoodanddrinksaquasiexperimentalanalysis |