Air enema reduction versus hydrostatic enema reduction for intussusceptions in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
<h4>Objectives</h4>We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of fluoroscopy-guided air enema reduction (FGAR) and ultrasound-guided hydrostatic enema reduction (UGHR) for the treatment of intussusception in pediatric patients.<h4>Methods<...
Main Authors: | Lan Liu, Ling Zhang, Yifan Fang, Yingying Yang, Wen You, Jianxi Bai, Bing Zhang, Siqi Xie, Yuanyuan Fang |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2024-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297985 |
Similar Items
-
Air enema reduction versus hydrostatic enema reduction for intussusceptions in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Lan Liu, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Enema reduction of intussusception: the success rate of hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction
by: Khorana J, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Bedside hydrostatic saline enema reduction of pediatric intussusception: Our experience
by: Rahul Gupta, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Status survey on enema reduction of paediatric intussusception in China
by: Xiao Bing Tang, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Indications for repeated enema reduction of intussusception in children
by: Vujović Dragana, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)