A Multi-Sensor Comparative Analysis on the Suitability of Generated DEM from Sentinel-1 SAR Interferometry Using Statistical and Hydrological Models

Digital elevation model (DEM) plays a vital role in hydrological modelling and environmental studies. Many essential layers can be extracted from this land surface information, including slope, aspect, rivers, and curvature. Therefore, DEM quality and accuracy will affect the extracted features and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayub Mohammadi, Sadra Karimzadeh, Shazad Jamal Jalal, Khalil Valizadeh Kamran, Himan Shahabi, Saeid Homayouni, Nadhir Al-Ansari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/24/7214
_version_ 1797544504649056256
author Ayub Mohammadi
Sadra Karimzadeh
Shazad Jamal Jalal
Khalil Valizadeh Kamran
Himan Shahabi
Saeid Homayouni
Nadhir Al-Ansari
author_facet Ayub Mohammadi
Sadra Karimzadeh
Shazad Jamal Jalal
Khalil Valizadeh Kamran
Himan Shahabi
Saeid Homayouni
Nadhir Al-Ansari
author_sort Ayub Mohammadi
collection DOAJ
description Digital elevation model (DEM) plays a vital role in hydrological modelling and environmental studies. Many essential layers can be extracted from this land surface information, including slope, aspect, rivers, and curvature. Therefore, DEM quality and accuracy will affect the extracted features and the whole process of modeling. Despite freely available DEMs from various sources, many researchers generate this information for their areas from various observations. Sentinal-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are among the best Earth observations for DEM generation thanks to their availabilities, high-resolution, and C-band sensitivity to surface structure. This paper presents a comparative study, from a hydrological point of view, on the quality and reliability of the DEMs generated from Sentinel-1 data and DEMs from other sources such as AIRSAR, ALOS-PALSAR, TanDEM-X, and SRTM. To this end, pair of Sentinel-1 data were acquired and processed using the SAR interferometry technique to produce a DEM for two different study areas of a part of the Cameron Highlands, Pahang, Malaysia, a part of Sanandaj, Iran. Based on the estimated linear regression and standard errors, generating DEM from Sentinel-1 did not yield promising results. The river streams for all DEMs were extracted using geospatial analysis tool in a geographic information system (GIS) environment. The results indicated that because of the higher spatial resolution (compared to SRTM and TanDEM-X), more stream orders were delineated from AIRSAR and Sentinel-1 DEMs. Due to the shorter perpendicular baseline, the phase decorrelation in the created DEM resulted in a lot of noise. At the same time, results from ground control points (GCPs) showed that the created DEM from Sentinel-1 is not promising. Therefore, other DEMs’ performance, such as 90-meters’ TanDEM-X and 30-meters’ SRTM, are better than Sentinel-1 DEM (with a better spatial resolution).
first_indexed 2024-03-10T14:01:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd5f4fff31174613bcb932e1b32e92b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T14:01:29Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-dd5f4fff31174613bcb932e1b32e92b02023-11-21T01:09:41ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-12-012024721410.3390/s20247214A Multi-Sensor Comparative Analysis on the Suitability of Generated DEM from Sentinel-1 SAR Interferometry Using Statistical and Hydrological ModelsAyub Mohammadi0Sadra Karimzadeh1Shazad Jamal Jalal2Khalil Valizadeh Kamran3Himan Shahabi4Saeid Homayouni5Nadhir Al-Ansari6Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, IranDepartment of Remote Sensing and GIS, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, IranCollege of Engineering, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani 46001, IraqDepartment of Remote Sensing and GIS, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, IranDepartment of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 6617715175, IranCentre Eau Terre Environnement, Institute National de la Recherche Scientifique, Quebec, QC G1K 9A9, CanadaDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 971 87 Lulea, SwedenDigital elevation model (DEM) plays a vital role in hydrological modelling and environmental studies. Many essential layers can be extracted from this land surface information, including slope, aspect, rivers, and curvature. Therefore, DEM quality and accuracy will affect the extracted features and the whole process of modeling. Despite freely available DEMs from various sources, many researchers generate this information for their areas from various observations. Sentinal-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are among the best Earth observations for DEM generation thanks to their availabilities, high-resolution, and C-band sensitivity to surface structure. This paper presents a comparative study, from a hydrological point of view, on the quality and reliability of the DEMs generated from Sentinel-1 data and DEMs from other sources such as AIRSAR, ALOS-PALSAR, TanDEM-X, and SRTM. To this end, pair of Sentinel-1 data were acquired and processed using the SAR interferometry technique to produce a DEM for two different study areas of a part of the Cameron Highlands, Pahang, Malaysia, a part of Sanandaj, Iran. Based on the estimated linear regression and standard errors, generating DEM from Sentinel-1 did not yield promising results. The river streams for all DEMs were extracted using geospatial analysis tool in a geographic information system (GIS) environment. The results indicated that because of the higher spatial resolution (compared to SRTM and TanDEM-X), more stream orders were delineated from AIRSAR and Sentinel-1 DEMs. Due to the shorter perpendicular baseline, the phase decorrelation in the created DEM resulted in a lot of noise. At the same time, results from ground control points (GCPs) showed that the created DEM from Sentinel-1 is not promising. Therefore, other DEMs’ performance, such as 90-meters’ TanDEM-X and 30-meters’ SRTM, are better than Sentinel-1 DEM (with a better spatial resolution).https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/24/7214DEMremote sensingSAR imageryMalaysiaIran
spellingShingle Ayub Mohammadi
Sadra Karimzadeh
Shazad Jamal Jalal
Khalil Valizadeh Kamran
Himan Shahabi
Saeid Homayouni
Nadhir Al-Ansari
A Multi-Sensor Comparative Analysis on the Suitability of Generated DEM from Sentinel-1 SAR Interferometry Using Statistical and Hydrological Models
Sensors
DEM
remote sensing
SAR imagery
Malaysia
Iran
title A Multi-Sensor Comparative Analysis on the Suitability of Generated DEM from Sentinel-1 SAR Interferometry Using Statistical and Hydrological Models
title_full A Multi-Sensor Comparative Analysis on the Suitability of Generated DEM from Sentinel-1 SAR Interferometry Using Statistical and Hydrological Models
title_fullStr A Multi-Sensor Comparative Analysis on the Suitability of Generated DEM from Sentinel-1 SAR Interferometry Using Statistical and Hydrological Models
title_full_unstemmed A Multi-Sensor Comparative Analysis on the Suitability of Generated DEM from Sentinel-1 SAR Interferometry Using Statistical and Hydrological Models
title_short A Multi-Sensor Comparative Analysis on the Suitability of Generated DEM from Sentinel-1 SAR Interferometry Using Statistical and Hydrological Models
title_sort multi sensor comparative analysis on the suitability of generated dem from sentinel 1 sar interferometry using statistical and hydrological models
topic DEM
remote sensing
SAR imagery
Malaysia
Iran
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/24/7214
work_keys_str_mv AT ayubmohammadi amultisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT sadrakarimzadeh amultisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT shazadjamaljalal amultisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT khalilvalizadehkamran amultisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT himanshahabi amultisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT saeidhomayouni amultisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT nadhiralansari amultisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT ayubmohammadi multisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT sadrakarimzadeh multisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT shazadjamaljalal multisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT khalilvalizadehkamran multisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT himanshahabi multisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT saeidhomayouni multisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels
AT nadhiralansari multisensorcomparativeanalysisonthesuitabilityofgenerateddemfromsentinel1sarinterferometryusingstatisticalandhydrologicalmodels