How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment and workers’ health and retention.METHODS: We conducted an overview of systematic reviews on organizational-level intervent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Birgit Aust, Jeppe Lykke Møller, Mads Nordentoft, Karen Bo Frydendall, Elizabeth Bengtsen, Andreas Brøgger Jensen, Anne Helene Garde, Michiel Kompier, Norbert Semmer, Reiner Rugulies, Sofie Østergaard Jaspers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH) 2023-07-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Online Access:https://www.sjweh.fi/article/4097
_version_ 1827912413927702528
author Birgit Aust
Jeppe Lykke Møller
Mads Nordentoft
Karen Bo Frydendall
Elizabeth Bengtsen
Andreas Brøgger Jensen
Anne Helene Garde
Michiel Kompier
Norbert Semmer
Reiner Rugulies
Sofie Østergaard Jaspers
author_facet Birgit Aust
Jeppe Lykke Møller
Mads Nordentoft
Karen Bo Frydendall
Elizabeth Bengtsen
Andreas Brøgger Jensen
Anne Helene Garde
Michiel Kompier
Norbert Semmer
Reiner Rugulies
Sofie Østergaard Jaspers
author_sort Birgit Aust
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment and workers’ health and retention.METHODS: We conducted an overview of systematic reviews on organizational-level interventions published between 2000 and 2020. We systematically searched academic databases, screened reference lists, and contacted experts, yielding 27 736 records. Of the 76 eligible reviews, 24 of weak quality were excluded, yielding 52 reviews of moderate (N=32) or strong (N=20) quality, covering 957 primary studies. We assessed quality of evidence based on quality of review, consistency of results, and proportion of controlled studies.RESULTS: Of the 52 reviews, 30 studied a specific intervention approach and 22 specific outcomes. Regarding intervention approaches, we found strong quality of evidence for interventions focusing on “changes in working time arrangements” and moderate quality of evidence for “influence on work tasks or work organization”, “health care approach changes”, and “improvements of the psychosocial work environment”. Regarding outcomes, we found strong quality of evidence for interventions about “burnout” and moderate quality evidence for “various health and wellbeing outcomes”. For all other types of interventions, quality of evidence was either low or inconclusive, including interventions on retention.CONCLUSIONS: This overview of reviews identified strong or moderate quality of evidence for the effectiveness of organizational-level interventions for four specific intervention approaches and two health outcomes. This suggests that the work environment and the health of employees can be improved by certain organizational-level interventions. We need more research, especially about implementation and context, to improve the evidence.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T02:15:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd69fecd1e0f4503a8082b3c4215d611
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0355-3140
1795-990X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T02:15:27Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
spelling doaj.art-dd69fecd1e0f4503a8082b3c4215d6112023-06-30T16:05:38ZengNordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health0355-31401795-990X2023-07-0149531532910.5271/sjweh.4097How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviewsBirgit AustJeppe Lykke MøllerMads NordentoftKaren Bo FrydendallElizabeth BengtsenAndreas Brøgger JensenAnne Helene GardeMichiel KompierNorbert SemmerReiner RuguliesSofie Østergaard Jaspers OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment and workers’ health and retention.METHODS: We conducted an overview of systematic reviews on organizational-level interventions published between 2000 and 2020. We systematically searched academic databases, screened reference lists, and contacted experts, yielding 27 736 records. Of the 76 eligible reviews, 24 of weak quality were excluded, yielding 52 reviews of moderate (N=32) or strong (N=20) quality, covering 957 primary studies. We assessed quality of evidence based on quality of review, consistency of results, and proportion of controlled studies.RESULTS: Of the 52 reviews, 30 studied a specific intervention approach and 22 specific outcomes. Regarding intervention approaches, we found strong quality of evidence for interventions focusing on “changes in working time arrangements” and moderate quality of evidence for “influence on work tasks or work organization”, “health care approach changes”, and “improvements of the psychosocial work environment”. Regarding outcomes, we found strong quality of evidence for interventions about “burnout” and moderate quality evidence for “various health and wellbeing outcomes”. For all other types of interventions, quality of evidence was either low or inconclusive, including interventions on retention.CONCLUSIONS: This overview of reviews identified strong or moderate quality of evidence for the effectiveness of organizational-level interventions for four specific intervention approaches and two health outcomes. This suggests that the work environment and the health of employees can be improved by certain organizational-level interventions. We need more research, especially about implementation and context, to improve the evidence.https://www.sjweh.fi/article/4097
spellingShingle Birgit Aust
Jeppe Lykke Møller
Mads Nordentoft
Karen Bo Frydendall
Elizabeth Bengtsen
Andreas Brøgger Jensen
Anne Helene Garde
Michiel Kompier
Norbert Semmer
Reiner Rugulies
Sofie Østergaard Jaspers
How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
title How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews
title_full How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews
title_fullStr How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews
title_short How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews
title_sort how effective are organizational level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment health and retention of workers a systematic overview of systematic reviews
url https://www.sjweh.fi/article/4097
work_keys_str_mv AT birgitaust howeffectiveareorganizationallevelinterventionsinimprovingthepsychosocialworkenvironmenthealthandretentionofworkersasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT jeppelykkemøller howeffectiveareorganizationallevelinterventionsinimprovingthepsychosocialworkenvironmenthealthandretentionofworkersasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT madsnordentoft howeffectiveareorganizationallevelinterventionsinimprovingthepsychosocialworkenvironmenthealthandretentionofworkersasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT karenbofrydendall howeffectiveareorganizationallevelinterventionsinimprovingthepsychosocialworkenvironmenthealthandretentionofworkersasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT elizabethbengtsen howeffectiveareorganizationallevelinterventionsinimprovingthepsychosocialworkenvironmenthealthandretentionofworkersasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT andreasbrøggerjensen howeffectiveareorganizationallevelinterventionsinimprovingthepsychosocialworkenvironmenthealthandretentionofworkersasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT annehelenegarde howeffectiveareorganizationallevelinterventionsinimprovingthepsychosocialworkenvironmenthealthandretentionofworkersasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT michielkompier howeffectiveareorganizationallevelinterventionsinimprovingthepsychosocialworkenvironmenthealthandretentionofworkersasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT norbertsemmer howeffectiveareorganizationallevelinterventionsinimprovingthepsychosocialworkenvironmenthealthandretentionofworkersasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT reinerrugulies howeffectiveareorganizationallevelinterventionsinimprovingthepsychosocialworkenvironmenthealthandretentionofworkersasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT sofieøstergaardjaspers howeffectiveareorganizationallevelinterventionsinimprovingthepsychosocialworkenvironmenthealthandretentionofworkersasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews