Using Combination of μ,β and γ Bands in Classi.cation of EEG Signals

Introduction: In most BCI articles which aim to separate movement imaginations, µ and &beta frequency bands have been used. In this paper, the effect of presence and absence of &gamma band on performance improvement is discussed since movement imaginations affect &gamma frequency band as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mina Mirnaziri, Masoomeh Rahimi, Sepidehsadat Alavikakhaki, Reza Ebrahimpour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2013-02-01
Series:Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-146&slc_lang=en&sid=1
_version_ 1797283063952048128
author Mina Mirnaziri
Masoomeh Rahimi
Sepidehsadat Alavikakhaki
Reza Ebrahimpour
author_facet Mina Mirnaziri
Masoomeh Rahimi
Sepidehsadat Alavikakhaki
Reza Ebrahimpour
author_sort Mina Mirnaziri
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: In most BCI articles which aim to separate movement imaginations, µ and &beta frequency bands have been used. In this paper, the effect of presence and absence of &gamma band on performance improvement is discussed since movement imaginations affect &gamma frequency band as well. Methods: In this study we used data set 2a from BCI Competition IV. In this data set, 9 healthy subjects have performed left hand, right hand, foot and tongue movement imaginations. Time and frequency intervals are computed for each subject and then are classi.ed using Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) as a feature extractor. Finally, data is classi.ed by LDA1, RBF2 MLP3, SVM4and KNN 5 methods. In all experiments, accuracy rate of classi.cation is computed using 4 fold validation method. Results: It is seen that most of the time, combination of &mu,&beta and &gamma bands would have better performance than just using combination of &mu and &beta bands or &gamma band alone. In general, the improvement rate of the average classi.cation accuracy is computed 2.91%. Discussion: In this study, it is shown that using combination of µ, &beta and &gamma frequency bands provides more information than only using combination of µ and &beta in movement imagination separations.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T17:25:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd6b5221ae0945d083063ca6adb6c359
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-126X
2228-7442
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T17:25:39Z
publishDate 2013-02-01
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-dd6b5221ae0945d083063ca6adb6c3592024-03-02T19:16:39ZengIran University of Medical SciencesBasic and Clinical Neuroscience2008-126X2228-74422013-02-01417687Using Combination of μ,β and γ Bands in Classi.cation of EEG SignalsMina Mirnaziri0Masoomeh Rahimi1Sepidehsadat Alavikakhaki2Reza Ebrahimpour3 Brain and Intelligent Systems Research Laboratory (BISLab), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, ShahidRajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran. Brain and Intelligent Systems Research Laboratory (BISLab), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, ShahidRajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran. Department of Computer Science, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of Tehran, Iran. Brain and Intelligent Systems Research Laboratory (BISLab), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, ShahidRajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran. Introduction: In most BCI articles which aim to separate movement imaginations, µ and &beta frequency bands have been used. In this paper, the effect of presence and absence of &gamma band on performance improvement is discussed since movement imaginations affect &gamma frequency band as well. Methods: In this study we used data set 2a from BCI Competition IV. In this data set, 9 healthy subjects have performed left hand, right hand, foot and tongue movement imaginations. Time and frequency intervals are computed for each subject and then are classi.ed using Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) as a feature extractor. Finally, data is classi.ed by LDA1, RBF2 MLP3, SVM4and KNN 5 methods. In all experiments, accuracy rate of classi.cation is computed using 4 fold validation method. Results: It is seen that most of the time, combination of &mu,&beta and &gamma bands would have better performance than just using combination of &mu and &beta bands or &gamma band alone. In general, the improvement rate of the average classi.cation accuracy is computed 2.91%. Discussion: In this study, it is shown that using combination of µ, &beta and &gamma frequency bands provides more information than only using combination of µ and &beta in movement imagination separations.http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-146&slc_lang=en&sid=1Brain – Computer Interface (BCI)Electroencephalogram (EEG)Common Spatial Pattern (CSP)Multi – Layer Perceptron (MLP)Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)Radial Basis Function (RBF).
spellingShingle Mina Mirnaziri
Masoomeh Rahimi
Sepidehsadat Alavikakhaki
Reza Ebrahimpour
Using Combination of μ,β and γ Bands in Classi.cation of EEG Signals
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
Brain – Computer Interface (BCI)
Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Common Spatial Pattern (CSP)
Multi – Layer Perceptron (MLP)
Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)
Radial Basis Function (RBF).
title Using Combination of μ,β and γ Bands in Classi.cation of EEG Signals
title_full Using Combination of μ,β and γ Bands in Classi.cation of EEG Signals
title_fullStr Using Combination of μ,β and γ Bands in Classi.cation of EEG Signals
title_full_unstemmed Using Combination of μ,β and γ Bands in Classi.cation of EEG Signals
title_short Using Combination of μ,β and γ Bands in Classi.cation of EEG Signals
title_sort using combination of μ β and γ bands in classi cation of eeg signals
topic Brain – Computer Interface (BCI)
Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Common Spatial Pattern (CSP)
Multi – Layer Perceptron (MLP)
Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)
Radial Basis Function (RBF).
url http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-146&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT minamirnaziri usingcombinationofmbandgbandsinclassicationofeegsignals
AT masoomehrahimi usingcombinationofmbandgbandsinclassicationofeegsignals
AT sepidehsadatalavikakhaki usingcombinationofmbandgbandsinclassicationofeegsignals
AT rezaebrahimpour usingcombinationofmbandgbandsinclassicationofeegsignals