Radiographic evaluation of partial articular radial head fractures: assessment of reliability

Background: Historically, treatment of partial articular radial head fractures has hinged on radiographic assessment and application of the Mason classification. The inter- and intra-rater reliability of radiographic assessment and classification of radial head fractures may be lower than previously...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timothy J. Luchetti, MD, Nicholas Newsum, MD, Daniel D. Bohl, MD, MPH, Mark S. Cohen, MD, Robert W. Wysocki, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-07-01
Series:JSES International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638321001146
_version_ 1819108044215156736
author Timothy J. Luchetti, MD
Nicholas Newsum, MD
Daniel D. Bohl, MD, MPH
Mark S. Cohen, MD
Robert W. Wysocki, MD
author_facet Timothy J. Luchetti, MD
Nicholas Newsum, MD
Daniel D. Bohl, MD, MPH
Mark S. Cohen, MD
Robert W. Wysocki, MD
author_sort Timothy J. Luchetti, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Historically, treatment of partial articular radial head fractures has hinged on radiographic assessment and application of the Mason classification. The inter- and intra-rater reliability of radiographic assessment and classification of radial head fractures may be lower than previously reported. We hypothesized that radiographic assessment leads to an underestimation of the number of fragments, percentage of articular surface involved, and displacement in millimeters. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all Mason II radial head fractures treated at our institution. Four independent observers performed radiographic assessment of the cohort. An independent observer performed these measurements on high-resolution computed tomography (CT) imaging, the reference standard. Radiographic assessments were then correlated with the CT findings using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Kappa statistic, where indicated. Results: Fifty-nine Mason II radial head fractures were reviewed. These results were not impressive, with all comparisons showing a Kappa statistic less than 0.5 (ie, weak agreement). Intra-rater reliability was similar: displacement (measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient) was 0.58, percent articular involvement was 0.74, and the number of fragments (measured by the Kappa statistic) was 0.28. Fracture displacement was generally underestimated on radiographic measurements when compared to CT scan. Nearly half (45%) of all cases demonstrated inaccurate fragment number assessment when compared to the reference standard. Conclusion: Radiographs show poor inter- and intra-observer reliability for determining radial head fracture morphology. Assessment of the number of fragments was particularly inaccurate. High-resolution CT should be considered for patients with Mason II radial head fractures, especially in cases of poorly visualized fracture characteristics or borderline amounts of displacement, in an effort to appropriately indicate patients for the variety of treatment options available today.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T03:03:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd71941ac5ae4dfd9ee85922ac13ae49
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-6383
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T03:03:40Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JSES International
spelling doaj.art-dd71941ac5ae4dfd9ee85922ac13ae492022-12-21T18:41:06ZengElsevierJSES International2666-63832021-07-0154782788Radiographic evaluation of partial articular radial head fractures: assessment of reliabilityTimothy J. Luchetti, MD0Nicholas Newsum, MD1Daniel D. Bohl, MD, MPH2Mark S. Cohen, MD3Robert W. Wysocki, MD4Corresponding author: Timothy J. Luchetti, MD, 1611 West Harrison Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.; Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USARush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USARush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USARush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USARush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USABackground: Historically, treatment of partial articular radial head fractures has hinged on radiographic assessment and application of the Mason classification. The inter- and intra-rater reliability of radiographic assessment and classification of radial head fractures may be lower than previously reported. We hypothesized that radiographic assessment leads to an underestimation of the number of fragments, percentage of articular surface involved, and displacement in millimeters. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all Mason II radial head fractures treated at our institution. Four independent observers performed radiographic assessment of the cohort. An independent observer performed these measurements on high-resolution computed tomography (CT) imaging, the reference standard. Radiographic assessments were then correlated with the CT findings using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Kappa statistic, where indicated. Results: Fifty-nine Mason II radial head fractures were reviewed. These results were not impressive, with all comparisons showing a Kappa statistic less than 0.5 (ie, weak agreement). Intra-rater reliability was similar: displacement (measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient) was 0.58, percent articular involvement was 0.74, and the number of fragments (measured by the Kappa statistic) was 0.28. Fracture displacement was generally underestimated on radiographic measurements when compared to CT scan. Nearly half (45%) of all cases demonstrated inaccurate fragment number assessment when compared to the reference standard. Conclusion: Radiographs show poor inter- and intra-observer reliability for determining radial head fracture morphology. Assessment of the number of fragments was particularly inaccurate. High-resolution CT should be considered for patients with Mason II radial head fractures, especially in cases of poorly visualized fracture characteristics or borderline amounts of displacement, in an effort to appropriately indicate patients for the variety of treatment options available today.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638321001146Radial head fractureRadiographsReliabilityAccuracyComputed tomographyMason classification
spellingShingle Timothy J. Luchetti, MD
Nicholas Newsum, MD
Daniel D. Bohl, MD, MPH
Mark S. Cohen, MD
Robert W. Wysocki, MD
Radiographic evaluation of partial articular radial head fractures: assessment of reliability
JSES International
Radial head fracture
Radiographs
Reliability
Accuracy
Computed tomography
Mason classification
title Radiographic evaluation of partial articular radial head fractures: assessment of reliability
title_full Radiographic evaluation of partial articular radial head fractures: assessment of reliability
title_fullStr Radiographic evaluation of partial articular radial head fractures: assessment of reliability
title_full_unstemmed Radiographic evaluation of partial articular radial head fractures: assessment of reliability
title_short Radiographic evaluation of partial articular radial head fractures: assessment of reliability
title_sort radiographic evaluation of partial articular radial head fractures assessment of reliability
topic Radial head fracture
Radiographs
Reliability
Accuracy
Computed tomography
Mason classification
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638321001146
work_keys_str_mv AT timothyjluchettimd radiographicevaluationofpartialarticularradialheadfracturesassessmentofreliability
AT nicholasnewsummd radiographicevaluationofpartialarticularradialheadfracturesassessmentofreliability
AT danieldbohlmdmph radiographicevaluationofpartialarticularradialheadfracturesassessmentofreliability
AT markscohenmd radiographicevaluationofpartialarticularradialheadfracturesassessmentofreliability
AT robertwwysockimd radiographicevaluationofpartialarticularradialheadfracturesassessmentofreliability