Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What?

Intransitive, incomplete and discontinuous preferences are not always irrational but may be based on quite reasonable considerations. Hence, we pursue the possibility of building a theory of social choice on an alternative foundation, viz. on individual preference tournaments. Tournaments have been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hannu Nurmi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wrocław University of Science and Technology 2014-01-01
Series:Operations Research and Decisions
Online Access:http://orduser.pwr.wroc.pl/DownloadFile.aspx?aid=1141
_version_ 1811212720483074048
author Hannu Nurmi
author_facet Hannu Nurmi
author_sort Hannu Nurmi
collection DOAJ
description Intransitive, incomplete and discontinuous preferences are not always irrational but may be based on quite reasonable considerations. Hence, we pursue the possibility of building a theory of social choice on an alternative foundation, viz. on individual preference tournaments. Tournaments have been studied for a long time independently of rankings and a number of results are therefore just waiting to be applied in social choice. Our focus is on Slater's rule. A new interpretation of the rule is provided. (original abstract)
first_indexed 2024-04-12T05:33:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd761e77be3e42dc8a693e89581b9ef8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2081-8858
2391-6060
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T05:33:53Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wrocław University of Science and Technology
record_format Article
series Operations Research and Decisions
spelling doaj.art-dd761e77be3e42dc8a693e89581b9ef82022-12-22T03:45:58ZengWrocław University of Science and TechnologyOperations Research and Decisions2081-88582391-60602014-01-01vol. 24no. 46374171350217Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What?Hannu Nurmi0University of Turku, FinlandIntransitive, incomplete and discontinuous preferences are not always irrational but may be based on quite reasonable considerations. Hence, we pursue the possibility of building a theory of social choice on an alternative foundation, viz. on individual preference tournaments. Tournaments have been studied for a long time independently of rankings and a number of results are therefore just waiting to be applied in social choice. Our focus is on Slater's rule. A new interpretation of the rule is provided. (original abstract)http://orduser.pwr.wroc.pl/DownloadFile.aspx?aid=1141
spellingShingle Hannu Nurmi
Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What?
Operations Research and Decisions
title Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What?
title_full Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What?
title_fullStr Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What?
title_full_unstemmed Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What?
title_short Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What?
title_sort are we done with preference rankings if we are then what
url http://orduser.pwr.wroc.pl/DownloadFile.aspx?aid=1141
work_keys_str_mv AT hannunurmi arewedonewithpreferencerankingsifwearethenwhat