Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What?
Intransitive, incomplete and discontinuous preferences are not always irrational but may be based on quite reasonable considerations. Hence, we pursue the possibility of building a theory of social choice on an alternative foundation, viz. on individual preference tournaments. Tournaments have been...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wrocław University of Science and Technology
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Operations Research and Decisions |
Online Access: | http://orduser.pwr.wroc.pl/DownloadFile.aspx?aid=1141 |
_version_ | 1811212720483074048 |
---|---|
author | Hannu Nurmi |
author_facet | Hannu Nurmi |
author_sort | Hannu Nurmi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Intransitive, incomplete and discontinuous preferences are not always irrational but may be based on quite reasonable considerations. Hence, we pursue the possibility of building a theory of social choice on an alternative foundation, viz. on individual preference tournaments. Tournaments have been studied for a long time independently of rankings and a number of results are therefore just waiting to be applied in social choice. Our focus is on Slater's rule. A new interpretation of the rule is provided. (original abstract) |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T05:33:53Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-dd761e77be3e42dc8a693e89581b9ef8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2081-8858 2391-6060 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T05:33:53Z |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | Wrocław University of Science and Technology |
record_format | Article |
series | Operations Research and Decisions |
spelling | doaj.art-dd761e77be3e42dc8a693e89581b9ef82022-12-22T03:45:58ZengWrocław University of Science and TechnologyOperations Research and Decisions2081-88582391-60602014-01-01vol. 24no. 46374171350217Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What?Hannu Nurmi0University of Turku, FinlandIntransitive, incomplete and discontinuous preferences are not always irrational but may be based on quite reasonable considerations. Hence, we pursue the possibility of building a theory of social choice on an alternative foundation, viz. on individual preference tournaments. Tournaments have been studied for a long time independently of rankings and a number of results are therefore just waiting to be applied in social choice. Our focus is on Slater's rule. A new interpretation of the rule is provided. (original abstract)http://orduser.pwr.wroc.pl/DownloadFile.aspx?aid=1141 |
spellingShingle | Hannu Nurmi Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What? Operations Research and Decisions |
title | Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What? |
title_full | Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What? |
title_fullStr | Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What? |
title_short | Are We Done with Preference Rankings? If We Are, Then What? |
title_sort | are we done with preference rankings if we are then what |
url | http://orduser.pwr.wroc.pl/DownloadFile.aspx?aid=1141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hannunurmi arewedonewithpreferencerankingsifwearethenwhat |