Reexamination and further development of two‐stream canopy radiative transfer models for global land modeling

Abstract Four representative two‐stream canopy radiative transfer models were examined and intercompared using the same configuration. Based on the comparison results, two modifications were introduced to the widely used Dickinson‐Sellers model and then incorporated into the Community Land Model (CL...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hua Yuan, Yongjiu Dai, Robert E. Dickinson, Bernard Pinty, Wei Shangguan, Shupeng Zhang, Lili Wang, Siguang Zhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2017-03-01
Series:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000773
_version_ 1797736036724375552
author Hua Yuan
Yongjiu Dai
Robert E. Dickinson
Bernard Pinty
Wei Shangguan
Shupeng Zhang
Lili Wang
Siguang Zhu
author_facet Hua Yuan
Yongjiu Dai
Robert E. Dickinson
Bernard Pinty
Wei Shangguan
Shupeng Zhang
Lili Wang
Siguang Zhu
author_sort Hua Yuan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Four representative two‐stream canopy radiative transfer models were examined and intercompared using the same configuration. Based on the comparison results, two modifications were introduced to the widely used Dickinson‐Sellers model and then incorporated into the Community Land Model (CLM4.5). The modified model was tested against Monte‐Carlo simulations and produced significant improvements in the simulated canopy transmittance and albedo values. In direct comparison with MODIS albedo data, the modified model shows good performance over most snow/ice‐free vegetated areas, especially for regions that are covered by dense canopy. The modified model shows seasonally dependent behavior mainly in the near‐infrared band. Thus, the improvements are not present in all seasons. Large biases are still noticeable in sparsely vegetated areas, in particular for the snow/ice covered regions, that is possibly related to the model, the land surface input data, or even the observations themselves. Further studies focusing on the impact of the seasonal changes in leaf optical properties, the parameterizations for snow/ice covered regions and the case of sparsely vegetated areas, are recommended.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:07:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd766596464d45198c206f8025ae19e8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1942-2466
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:07:45Z
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
spelling doaj.art-dd766596464d45198c206f8025ae19e82023-08-28T13:36:50ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems1942-24662017-03-019111312910.1002/2016MS000773Reexamination and further development of two‐stream canopy radiative transfer models for global land modelingHua Yuan0Yongjiu Dai1Robert E. Dickinson2Bernard Pinty3Wei Shangguan4Shupeng Zhang5Lili Wang6Siguang Zhu7School of Atmospheric SciencesSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhou Guangdong ChinaSchool of Atmospheric SciencesSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhou Guangdong ChinaDepartment of Geological SciencesUniversity of Texas at AustinAustin Texas USAEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Knowledge for Sustainable Development and Food SecurityIspra, Varese ItalySchool of Atmospheric SciencesSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhou Guangdong ChinaSchool of Atmospheric SciencesSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhou Guangdong ChinaCollege of Global Change and Earth System ScienceBeijing Normal UniversityBeijing ChinaCollege of Global Change and Earth System ScienceBeijing Normal UniversityBeijing ChinaAbstract Four representative two‐stream canopy radiative transfer models were examined and intercompared using the same configuration. Based on the comparison results, two modifications were introduced to the widely used Dickinson‐Sellers model and then incorporated into the Community Land Model (CLM4.5). The modified model was tested against Monte‐Carlo simulations and produced significant improvements in the simulated canopy transmittance and albedo values. In direct comparison with MODIS albedo data, the modified model shows good performance over most snow/ice‐free vegetated areas, especially for regions that are covered by dense canopy. The modified model shows seasonally dependent behavior mainly in the near‐infrared band. Thus, the improvements are not present in all seasons. Large biases are still noticeable in sparsely vegetated areas, in particular for the snow/ice covered regions, that is possibly related to the model, the land surface input data, or even the observations themselves. Further studies focusing on the impact of the seasonal changes in leaf optical properties, the parameterizations for snow/ice covered regions and the case of sparsely vegetated areas, are recommended.https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000773vegetation canopy radiative transfertwo‐stream approximationthe Community Land Model
spellingShingle Hua Yuan
Yongjiu Dai
Robert E. Dickinson
Bernard Pinty
Wei Shangguan
Shupeng Zhang
Lili Wang
Siguang Zhu
Reexamination and further development of two‐stream canopy radiative transfer models for global land modeling
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
vegetation canopy radiative transfer
two‐stream approximation
the Community Land Model
title Reexamination and further development of two‐stream canopy radiative transfer models for global land modeling
title_full Reexamination and further development of two‐stream canopy radiative transfer models for global land modeling
title_fullStr Reexamination and further development of two‐stream canopy radiative transfer models for global land modeling
title_full_unstemmed Reexamination and further development of two‐stream canopy radiative transfer models for global land modeling
title_short Reexamination and further development of two‐stream canopy radiative transfer models for global land modeling
title_sort reexamination and further development of two stream canopy radiative transfer models for global land modeling
topic vegetation canopy radiative transfer
two‐stream approximation
the Community Land Model
url https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000773
work_keys_str_mv AT huayuan reexaminationandfurtherdevelopmentoftwostreamcanopyradiativetransfermodelsforgloballandmodeling
AT yongjiudai reexaminationandfurtherdevelopmentoftwostreamcanopyradiativetransfermodelsforgloballandmodeling
AT robertedickinson reexaminationandfurtherdevelopmentoftwostreamcanopyradiativetransfermodelsforgloballandmodeling
AT bernardpinty reexaminationandfurtherdevelopmentoftwostreamcanopyradiativetransfermodelsforgloballandmodeling
AT weishangguan reexaminationandfurtherdevelopmentoftwostreamcanopyradiativetransfermodelsforgloballandmodeling
AT shupengzhang reexaminationandfurtherdevelopmentoftwostreamcanopyradiativetransfermodelsforgloballandmodeling
AT liliwang reexaminationandfurtherdevelopmentoftwostreamcanopyradiativetransfermodelsforgloballandmodeling
AT siguangzhu reexaminationandfurtherdevelopmentoftwostreamcanopyradiativetransfermodelsforgloballandmodeling