Causation in different scientific disciplines: A comparison of standards in occupational medicine and particle physics

Occupational medical research involves the collection and analysis of data to draw conclusions about the causes and prevention of workplace injuries and diseases. However, there has been criticism that some studies lack rigour in determining causation. This article examines the similarities and diff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jack Rennie Dale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine 2023-10-01
Series:Medycyna Pracy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://medpr.imp.lodz.pl/Causation-in-different-scientific-disciplines-A-comparison-of-standards-in-occupational,170914,0,2.html
_version_ 1797541940803141632
author Jack Rennie Dale
author_facet Jack Rennie Dale
author_sort Jack Rennie Dale
collection DOAJ
description Occupational medical research involves the collection and analysis of data to draw conclusions about the causes and prevention of workplace injuries and diseases. However, there has been criticism that some studies lack rigour in determining causation. This article examines the similarities and differences between occupational medical research and particle physics in terms of their approach to hypothesis testing, statistical methods, and confounder control. The article also explores the use of criteria such as the Bradford Hill criteria to determine causation in occupational medical research. While particle physics is often viewed as a highly rigorous science, occupational medical research also employs rigorous scientific methods to ensure findings are accurate and reliable. However, there is room for improvement in determining causation in occupational medical research, particularly in the use of criteria such as the Bradford Hill criteria to guide the development of more robust studies. It is essential for occupational medical research to adhere to rigorous scientific methods to deliver findings that can help reduce workplace injuries and diseases. The use of criteria such as the Bradford Hill criteria can ensure that the conclusions drawn. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2023;74(4):333–9.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T13:22:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd791d32a0d74dcbb4e70dc1cf115b3f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0465-5893
2353-1339
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T13:22:43Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
record_format Article
series Medycyna Pracy
spelling doaj.art-dd791d32a0d74dcbb4e70dc1cf115b3f2023-11-21T09:55:58ZengNofer Institute of Occupational MedicineMedycyna Pracy0465-58932353-13392023-10-0174433333910.13075/mp.5893.01387170914Causation in different scientific disciplines: A comparison of standards in occupational medicine and particle physicsJack Rennie Dale0https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8441-8994Tasmanian Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hobart, AustraliaOccupational medical research involves the collection and analysis of data to draw conclusions about the causes and prevention of workplace injuries and diseases. However, there has been criticism that some studies lack rigour in determining causation. This article examines the similarities and differences between occupational medical research and particle physics in terms of their approach to hypothesis testing, statistical methods, and confounder control. The article also explores the use of criteria such as the Bradford Hill criteria to determine causation in occupational medical research. While particle physics is often viewed as a highly rigorous science, occupational medical research also employs rigorous scientific methods to ensure findings are accurate and reliable. However, there is room for improvement in determining causation in occupational medical research, particularly in the use of criteria such as the Bradford Hill criteria to guide the development of more robust studies. It is essential for occupational medical research to adhere to rigorous scientific methods to deliver findings that can help reduce workplace injuries and diseases. The use of criteria such as the Bradford Hill criteria can ensure that the conclusions drawn. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2023;74(4):333–9.http://medpr.imp.lodz.pl/Causation-in-different-scientific-disciplines-A-comparison-of-standards-in-occupational,170914,0,2.htmloccupational medicineevidence-based medicinecausationparticle physicslevels of evidencebradford hill criteria
spellingShingle Jack Rennie Dale
Causation in different scientific disciplines: A comparison of standards in occupational medicine and particle physics
Medycyna Pracy
occupational medicine
evidence-based medicine
causation
particle physics
levels of evidence
bradford hill criteria
title Causation in different scientific disciplines: A comparison of standards in occupational medicine and particle physics
title_full Causation in different scientific disciplines: A comparison of standards in occupational medicine and particle physics
title_fullStr Causation in different scientific disciplines: A comparison of standards in occupational medicine and particle physics
title_full_unstemmed Causation in different scientific disciplines: A comparison of standards in occupational medicine and particle physics
title_short Causation in different scientific disciplines: A comparison of standards in occupational medicine and particle physics
title_sort causation in different scientific disciplines a comparison of standards in occupational medicine and particle physics
topic occupational medicine
evidence-based medicine
causation
particle physics
levels of evidence
bradford hill criteria
url http://medpr.imp.lodz.pl/Causation-in-different-scientific-disciplines-A-comparison-of-standards-in-occupational,170914,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT jackrenniedale causationindifferentscientificdisciplinesacomparisonofstandardsinoccupationalmedicineandparticlephysics