COMPARISON OF INTUBATION QUALITY AND HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE IN ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION BETWEEN SUPERIOR LARINGEUS AND TRANSTRACHEAL BLOCK AND MUSCLE RELAXANTS

Background. Endotracheal intubation stimulates various responses such as coughing and bucking, bronchial and laryngeal spasm and hemodynamic changes. Muscle relaxants facilitate easy intubation, but not suppressing hemodynamic response. Superior laryngeus and transtracheal block is presume to suppre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanggia Primadita, Bhisma Murti, Sugeng Budi Santosa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Brawijaya 2018-04-01
Series:Malang Neurology Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://mnj.ub.ac.id/index.php/mnj/article/view/344
_version_ 1818059179807473664
author Hanggia Primadita
Bhisma Murti
Sugeng Budi Santosa
author_facet Hanggia Primadita
Bhisma Murti
Sugeng Budi Santosa
author_sort Hanggia Primadita
collection DOAJ
description Background. Endotracheal intubation stimulates various responses such as coughing and bucking, bronchial and laryngeal spasm and hemodynamic changes. Muscle relaxants facilitate easy intubation, but not suppressing hemodynamic response. Superior laryngeus and transtracheal block is presume to suppress hemodynamic changes while maintain intubation quality. Objective. To compare intubation quality and hemodynamic response from superior laryngeus and transtracheal block and muscle relaxants. Methods. Intubation quality is assessed using Helbo-Hansen Raulo and Trap Anderson. Blood Pressure, pulse and saturation were measured before and after intubation. Results. All intubation is acceptable in muscle relaxants group (100%), one unacceptable in block group (5.9%). After intubation hemodynamic in both groups were significantly different (p=<0.05) for systolics (148.35±26.33 vs 109.53±15.98), diastolics (94.88±20.18 vs 68.00±15.54), MAP (109.65±21.18 vs 79.94±16.94), and for pulse (101.71±16.34 vs 87.47±20.03), except for saturation (99.35±0.79 vs 99.35±0.99). Conclusion. Muscle relaxant and block deliver similar intubation quality, however block giving out better hemodynamic response stability.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T13:12:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd849c7ce41d4f2e9759a8816464a111
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2407-6724
2442-5001
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T13:12:25Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher University of Brawijaya
record_format Article
series Malang Neurology Journal
spelling doaj.art-dd849c7ce41d4f2e9759a8816464a1112022-12-22T01:47:39ZengUniversity of BrawijayaMalang Neurology Journal2407-67242442-50012018-04-0142727710.21776/ub.mnj.2018.004.02.575COMPARISON OF INTUBATION QUALITY AND HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE IN ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION BETWEEN SUPERIOR LARINGEUS AND TRANSTRACHEAL BLOCK AND MUSCLE RELAXANTSHanggia Primadita0Bhisma Murti1Sugeng Budi Santosa2Program Studi Anestesiologi dan Terapi Intensif Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret, SurakartaProgram Studi Magister Kedokteran Keluarga Fakultas Pasca Sarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, SurakartaProgram Studi Anestesiologi dan Terapi Intensif Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret, SurakartaBackground. Endotracheal intubation stimulates various responses such as coughing and bucking, bronchial and laryngeal spasm and hemodynamic changes. Muscle relaxants facilitate easy intubation, but not suppressing hemodynamic response. Superior laryngeus and transtracheal block is presume to suppress hemodynamic changes while maintain intubation quality. Objective. To compare intubation quality and hemodynamic response from superior laryngeus and transtracheal block and muscle relaxants. Methods. Intubation quality is assessed using Helbo-Hansen Raulo and Trap Anderson. Blood Pressure, pulse and saturation were measured before and after intubation. Results. All intubation is acceptable in muscle relaxants group (100%), one unacceptable in block group (5.9%). After intubation hemodynamic in both groups were significantly different (p=<0.05) for systolics (148.35±26.33 vs 109.53±15.98), diastolics (94.88±20.18 vs 68.00±15.54), MAP (109.65±21.18 vs 79.94±16.94), and for pulse (101.71±16.34 vs 87.47±20.03), except for saturation (99.35±0.79 vs 99.35±0.99). Conclusion. Muscle relaxant and block deliver similar intubation quality, however block giving out better hemodynamic response stability.http://mnj.ub.ac.id/index.php/mnj/article/view/344Intubationsuperior laryngeustranstrachealblock
spellingShingle Hanggia Primadita
Bhisma Murti
Sugeng Budi Santosa
COMPARISON OF INTUBATION QUALITY AND HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE IN ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION BETWEEN SUPERIOR LARINGEUS AND TRANSTRACHEAL BLOCK AND MUSCLE RELAXANTS
Malang Neurology Journal
Intubation
superior laryngeus
transtracheal
block
title COMPARISON OF INTUBATION QUALITY AND HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE IN ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION BETWEEN SUPERIOR LARINGEUS AND TRANSTRACHEAL BLOCK AND MUSCLE RELAXANTS
title_full COMPARISON OF INTUBATION QUALITY AND HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE IN ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION BETWEEN SUPERIOR LARINGEUS AND TRANSTRACHEAL BLOCK AND MUSCLE RELAXANTS
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF INTUBATION QUALITY AND HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE IN ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION BETWEEN SUPERIOR LARINGEUS AND TRANSTRACHEAL BLOCK AND MUSCLE RELAXANTS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF INTUBATION QUALITY AND HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE IN ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION BETWEEN SUPERIOR LARINGEUS AND TRANSTRACHEAL BLOCK AND MUSCLE RELAXANTS
title_short COMPARISON OF INTUBATION QUALITY AND HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE IN ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION BETWEEN SUPERIOR LARINGEUS AND TRANSTRACHEAL BLOCK AND MUSCLE RELAXANTS
title_sort comparison of intubation quality and haemodynamic response in endotracheal intubation between superior laringeus and transtracheal block and muscle relaxants
topic Intubation
superior laryngeus
transtracheal
block
url http://mnj.ub.ac.id/index.php/mnj/article/view/344
work_keys_str_mv AT hanggiaprimadita comparisonofintubationqualityandhaemodynamicresponseinendotrachealintubationbetweensuperiorlaringeusandtranstrachealblockandmusclerelaxants
AT bhismamurti comparisonofintubationqualityandhaemodynamicresponseinendotrachealintubationbetweensuperiorlaringeusandtranstrachealblockandmusclerelaxants
AT sugengbudisantosa comparisonofintubationqualityandhaemodynamicresponseinendotrachealintubationbetweensuperiorlaringeusandtranstrachealblockandmusclerelaxants