Automated Fiber Diameter and Porosity Measurements of Plasma Clots in Scanning Electron Microscopy Images

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) is a powerful, high-resolution imaging technique widely used to analyze the structure of fibrin networks. Currently, structural features, such as fiber diameter, length, density, and porosity, are mostly analyzed manually, which is tedious and may introduce user bi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Daraei, Marlien Pieters, Stephen R. Baker, Zelda de Lange-Loots, Aleksander Siniarski, Rustem I. Litvinov, Caroline S. B. Veen, Moniek P. M. de Maat, John W. Weisel, Robert A. S. Ariëns, Martin Guthold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Biomolecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/11/10/1536
_version_ 1797515179653595136
author Ali Daraei
Marlien Pieters
Stephen R. Baker
Zelda de Lange-Loots
Aleksander Siniarski
Rustem I. Litvinov
Caroline S. B. Veen
Moniek P. M. de Maat
John W. Weisel
Robert A. S. Ariëns
Martin Guthold
author_facet Ali Daraei
Marlien Pieters
Stephen R. Baker
Zelda de Lange-Loots
Aleksander Siniarski
Rustem I. Litvinov
Caroline S. B. Veen
Moniek P. M. de Maat
John W. Weisel
Robert A. S. Ariëns
Martin Guthold
author_sort Ali Daraei
collection DOAJ
description Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) is a powerful, high-resolution imaging technique widely used to analyze the structure of fibrin networks. Currently, structural features, such as fiber diameter, length, density, and porosity, are mostly analyzed manually, which is tedious and may introduce user bias. A reliable, automated structural image analysis method would mitigate these drawbacks. We evaluated the performance of DiameterJ (an ImageJ plug-in) for analyzing fibrin fiber diameter by comparing automated DiameterJ outputs with manual diameter measurements in four SEM data sets with different imaging parameters. We also investigated correlations between biophysical fibrin clot properties and diameter, and between clot permeability and DiameterJ-determined clot porosity. Several of the 24 DiameterJ algorithms returned diameter values that highly correlated with and closely matched the values of the manual measurements. However, optimal performance was dependent on the pixel size of the images—best results were obtained for images with a pixel size of 8–10 nm (13–16 pixels/fiber). Larger or smaller pixels resulted in an over- or underestimation of diameter values, respectively. The correlation between clot permeability and DiameterJ-determined clot porosity was modest, likely because it is difficult to establish the correct image depth of field in this analysis. In conclusion, several DiameterJ algorithms (M6, M5, T3) perform well for diameter determination from SEM images, given the appropriate imaging conditions (13–16 pixels/fiber). Determining fibrin clot porosity via DiameterJ is challenging.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:42:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd8dd48477f94d0a8ce5e81e78213674
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2218-273X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:42:50Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Biomolecules
spelling doaj.art-dd8dd48477f94d0a8ce5e81e782136742023-11-22T17:35:08ZengMDPI AGBiomolecules2218-273X2021-10-011110153610.3390/biom11101536Automated Fiber Diameter and Porosity Measurements of Plasma Clots in Scanning Electron Microscopy ImagesAli Daraei0Marlien Pieters1Stephen R. Baker2Zelda de Lange-Loots3Aleksander Siniarski4Rustem I. Litvinov5Caroline S. B. Veen6Moniek P. M. de Maat7John W. Weisel8Robert A. S. Ariëns9Martin Guthold10Department of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USACenter of Excellence for Nutrition (CEN), Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South AfricaDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USACenter of Excellence for Nutrition (CEN), Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South AfricaDepartment of Coronary Disease and Heart Failure, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-202 Krakow, PolandDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USADepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USALeeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS16 8FX, UKDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USAScanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) is a powerful, high-resolution imaging technique widely used to analyze the structure of fibrin networks. Currently, structural features, such as fiber diameter, length, density, and porosity, are mostly analyzed manually, which is tedious and may introduce user bias. A reliable, automated structural image analysis method would mitigate these drawbacks. We evaluated the performance of DiameterJ (an ImageJ plug-in) for analyzing fibrin fiber diameter by comparing automated DiameterJ outputs with manual diameter measurements in four SEM data sets with different imaging parameters. We also investigated correlations between biophysical fibrin clot properties and diameter, and between clot permeability and DiameterJ-determined clot porosity. Several of the 24 DiameterJ algorithms returned diameter values that highly correlated with and closely matched the values of the manual measurements. However, optimal performance was dependent on the pixel size of the images—best results were obtained for images with a pixel size of 8–10 nm (13–16 pixels/fiber). Larger or smaller pixels resulted in an over- or underestimation of diameter values, respectively. The correlation between clot permeability and DiameterJ-determined clot porosity was modest, likely because it is difficult to establish the correct image depth of field in this analysis. In conclusion, several DiameterJ algorithms (M6, M5, T3) perform well for diameter determination from SEM images, given the appropriate imaging conditions (13–16 pixels/fiber). Determining fibrin clot porosity via DiameterJ is challenging.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/11/10/1536automated analysisDiameterJstructurefibrin fibersplasma clotsdiameter
spellingShingle Ali Daraei
Marlien Pieters
Stephen R. Baker
Zelda de Lange-Loots
Aleksander Siniarski
Rustem I. Litvinov
Caroline S. B. Veen
Moniek P. M. de Maat
John W. Weisel
Robert A. S. Ariëns
Martin Guthold
Automated Fiber Diameter and Porosity Measurements of Plasma Clots in Scanning Electron Microscopy Images
Biomolecules
automated analysis
DiameterJ
structure
fibrin fibers
plasma clots
diameter
title Automated Fiber Diameter and Porosity Measurements of Plasma Clots in Scanning Electron Microscopy Images
title_full Automated Fiber Diameter and Porosity Measurements of Plasma Clots in Scanning Electron Microscopy Images
title_fullStr Automated Fiber Diameter and Porosity Measurements of Plasma Clots in Scanning Electron Microscopy Images
title_full_unstemmed Automated Fiber Diameter and Porosity Measurements of Plasma Clots in Scanning Electron Microscopy Images
title_short Automated Fiber Diameter and Porosity Measurements of Plasma Clots in Scanning Electron Microscopy Images
title_sort automated fiber diameter and porosity measurements of plasma clots in scanning electron microscopy images
topic automated analysis
DiameterJ
structure
fibrin fibers
plasma clots
diameter
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/11/10/1536
work_keys_str_mv AT alidaraei automatedfiberdiameterandporositymeasurementsofplasmaclotsinscanningelectronmicroscopyimages
AT marlienpieters automatedfiberdiameterandporositymeasurementsofplasmaclotsinscanningelectronmicroscopyimages
AT stephenrbaker automatedfiberdiameterandporositymeasurementsofplasmaclotsinscanningelectronmicroscopyimages
AT zeldadelangeloots automatedfiberdiameterandporositymeasurementsofplasmaclotsinscanningelectronmicroscopyimages
AT aleksandersiniarski automatedfiberdiameterandporositymeasurementsofplasmaclotsinscanningelectronmicroscopyimages
AT rustemilitvinov automatedfiberdiameterandporositymeasurementsofplasmaclotsinscanningelectronmicroscopyimages
AT carolinesbveen automatedfiberdiameterandporositymeasurementsofplasmaclotsinscanningelectronmicroscopyimages
AT moniekpmdemaat automatedfiberdiameterandporositymeasurementsofplasmaclotsinscanningelectronmicroscopyimages
AT johnwweisel automatedfiberdiameterandporositymeasurementsofplasmaclotsinscanningelectronmicroscopyimages
AT robertasariens automatedfiberdiameterandporositymeasurementsofplasmaclotsinscanningelectronmicroscopyimages
AT martinguthold automatedfiberdiameterandporositymeasurementsofplasmaclotsinscanningelectronmicroscopyimages